| Message ID | 20230116132152.405535-3-konrad.dybcio@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [v3,1/9] interconnect: qcom: rpm: make QoS INVALID default, separate out driver data | expand |
On 19.01.2023 01:27, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote: > On 18/01/2023 20:36, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> Would be very nice if somebody could test this one in particular >> on QCM2290 to make sure it does not regress that SoC.. >> >> Shawn, Loic? >> >> Konrad > > I have a 2290. > > Since I'm already helping with review, I'm happy to help with test too. Thanks! I'm afraid it won't be necessary though.. This patch gives more trouble than it solves. Here's the thing: It was working perfectly on my SM6375 for quite some time and then I rebased my branch on a newer -next and suddenly it makes things go boom boom.. I think I'll drop it in the next revision, even if that's what downstream does.. At least until I pretend to be an archaeologist surgeon again and debug this.. Konrad > > --- > bod
diff --git a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c index 385a67c20956..b1337f90c975 100644 --- a/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c +++ b/drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c @@ -239,15 +239,27 @@ static int qcom_icc_rpm_set(int mas_rpm_id, int slv_rpm_id, u64 sum_bw) static int __qcom_icc_set(struct icc_node *n, struct qcom_icc_node *qn, u64 sum_bw) { + struct qcom_icc_provider *qp = to_qcom_provider(n->provider); + bool vote_ap, vote_rpm; int ret; - if (!qn->qos.ap_owned) { - /* send bandwidth request message to the RPM processor */ + if (qp->type == QCOM_ICC_QNOC) { + vote_ap = true; + vote_rpm = true; + } else { + vote_ap = qn->qos.ap_owned; + vote_rpm = !vote_ap; + } + + if (vote_rpm) { + /* Send bandwidth request message to the RPM processor */ ret = qcom_icc_rpm_set(qn->mas_rpm_id, qn->slv_rpm_id, sum_bw); if (ret) return ret; - } else if (qn->qos.qos_mode != -1) { - /* set bandwidth directly from the AP */ + } + + if (vote_ap && qn->qos.qos_mode != NOC_QOS_MODE_INVALID) { + /* Set QoS params from the AP */ ret = qcom_icc_qos_set(n, sum_bw); if (ret) return ret;
On newer SoCs, QoS parameters and RPM bandwidth requests are wholly separate. Setting one should only depend on the description of the interconnect node and not whether the other is present. If we don't vote through RPM, QoS parameters should be set regardless, as we're requesting additional bandwidth by setting the interconnect clock rates. With NoC (the old-SoC bus type), this is not the case and they are mutually exclusive (so, the current upstream logic is correct). For BIMC however, newer SoCs expect QoS params to be always set (like QNoC) whereas older ones (like MSM8998) hang up completely when doing so, hence this will be addressed in the next commit. The Fixes tag references the commit in which this logic was added, it has since been shuffled around to a different file, but it's the one where it originates from. Fixes: f80a1d414328 ("interconnect: qcom: Add SDM660 interconnect provider driver") Reviewed-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@linaro.org> --- drivers/interconnect/qcom/icc-rpm.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)