Message ID | 20250522061122.2149188-2-fj5851bi@fujitsu.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] cpupower: Fix a bug where the -t option of the set subcommand was not working. | expand |
diff --git a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c index 0677b58374ab..59ace394cf3e 100644 --- a/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c +++ b/tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c @@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ int cmd_set(int argc, char **argv) params.params = 0; /* parameter parsing */ - while ((ret = getopt_long(argc, argv, "b:e:m:", - set_opts, NULL)) != -1) { + while ((ret = getopt_long(argc, argv, "b:e:m:t:", + set_opts, NULL)) != -1) { switch (ret) { case 'b': if (params.perf_bias)
The set subcommand's -t option is documented as being available for boost configuration, but it was not actually functioning due to a bug in the option handling. Signed-off-by: Shinji Nomoto <fj5851bi@fujitsu.com> --- tools/power/cpupower/utils/cpupower-set.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)