Message ID | 20240814-cleanup-h-of-node-put-regulator-v1-0-87151088b883@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | regulator: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths | expand |
On Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:04:04 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Make code a bit smaller/simpler, with less of_node_put() thanks to > cleanup.h. > > Best regards, > Krzysztof > Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next Thanks! [1/7] regulator: bd718x7: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths commit: 83c7cdeef5b22a73336eb18a59c7b4d63ec26659 [2/7] regulator: bd96801: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths commit: f372c262d4cfe31f0b67e8ae1a8ec9bf7c52d57b [3/7] regulator: max8997: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths commit: ea13bd391d1b8f62ae2347bde7a174059d7f3f0d [4/7] regulator: s5m8767: Use scoped device node handling to simplify error paths commit: 34a3f95941e0dfee750f2fd28faed4c8cd7ee42c [5/7] regulator: qcom-rpmh: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop commit: 17636d443fbe376d5192a7ce6a444aa45ce45541 [6/7] regulator: qcom-smd: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop commit: d4cd75b8eff72d65dab63668d5d883d72dda0426 [7/7] regulator: scmi: Simplify with scoped for each OF child loop commit: 99cf5db9cdd39136fd5dbd10bda833aa0f870452 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. Thanks, Mark