mbox series

[v2,0/3] support watchdog for exynosautov920

Message ID 20241010111807.3635504-1-trunixs.kim@samsung.com
Headers show
Series support watchdog for exynosautov920 | expand

Message

κΉ€νƒœμ™„ Oct. 10, 2024, 11:18 a.m. UTC
Add support for the ExynosAutoV920 SoC. Basically this is almost
similar to ExynosAuto V9 or Exynos850 such as two watchdog instance for
each cluster but some CPU configuration are quite different.
Therefore device tree, compatibles and drvdata should be added.

---
Changes in v2:
- Add a space before }
- Fix worng variant condition (cl1 -> cl0)
- Move the location declaring watchdog node
  to the correct location that fits the DTS coding rules
---

Byoungtae Cho (3):
  dt-bindings: watchdog: Document ExynosAutoV920 watchdog bindings
  watchdog: s3c2410_wdt: add support for exynosautov920 SoC
  arm64: dts: exynosautov920: add watchdog DT node

 .../bindings/watchdog/samsung-wdt.yaml        |  3 ++
 .../arm64/boot/dts/exynos/exynosautov920.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++
 drivers/watchdog/s3c2410_wdt.c                | 37 ++++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 10, 2024, 11:47 a.m. UTC | #1
On 10/10/2024 13:18, Taewan Kim wrote:
> From: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> 
> Add "samsung-exynosautov920-wdt" compatible to the dt-schema
> document. ExynosAutoV920 is new SoC for automotive, similar to
> exynosautov9 but some CPU configurations are quite different.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Byoungtae Cho <bt.cho@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Taewan Kim <trunixs.kim@samsung.com>

Shall we do the work twice?

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions, under or above your Signed-off-by tag. Tag is "received", when
provided in a message replied to you on the mailing list. Tools like b4
can help here. However, there's no need to repost patches *only* to add
the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the
version they apply.

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.5-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Best regards,
Krzysztof