From patchwork Mon Jun 15 10:43:15 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Marek Szyprowski X-Patchwork-Id: 187936 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 2002:a92:cf06:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id c6csp2623135ilo; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:43:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzcN5l7RxCTzrQVDrjT3OZZKaJjwYROBW8bHRxjW5qsas9gjTPlyohMZE8RMUzWWe/noeCL X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df05:: with SMTP id c5mr22501587edy.48.1592217808960; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:43:28 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1592217808; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=DuIKBrZxkwvcMRCHKHH+6WCACfpbtJ7g8UBXseQOi8g+TJsGZZiGif1SyivbEWnWxR IxTA3peTk+oRA2Ye53d8zCF7xnF/4if5jBMaFFo+zGcAW8yHsijd8Nq0ktvf3tOg6CeZ 3rwVUkZ42zmwv5AFVCA8p0UI09LSmAjAbvx2KScC+Zh2tcu2yWC3xUB3pxEuh5t/hJmM Qvb76u/eZsUzDLCPe4TQt+WxOS1HjkyvrP7frW/reEmIJQq/NAI/UTrifEOb7/e8t89q 8g68RLVAo4MGgvWDYOoSoSu7vb+roxIYaSjcjwAYFq6oXm9JE22NQS14lsKwPDN6xOaQ iUiA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:cms-type:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature:dkim-filter; bh=Ume2R9kOCSiT6xRyuYVOBL9vk+mkA7/GR3/GWXOOsAM=; b=zHZeM9Tt00BfliAe1vMv9VhbkGb0d70ZbTXSGp2vqDymLO0nH1QnT1Es7Sa0LIES5A +ndje8+YliJ01yybv363sJlsBC/5usR/cITHCoOLTC70fPQTEbUvr/yZF6VoDQjURq6y QUoEk5Kr9cvbgdtuHfsQJptnZJ7q4fV5qei3pABgDyzQEjdm77n7pKwdONqfpOBYOXNN jcNL/7Mpi4WYm9LQt8uVa5d8PS08pOOkrqcIP18jrDn5/QZIozGpp1YgkdxELxf9BKW4 OE3+yPE+1yB70ySKHWVoUwxBHh9lPblGV41IF74kiYp4vxLG3vXWfHodqDTE6Ld9Po0B AgSQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@samsung.com header.s=mail20170921 header.b="LbFOM0G/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=samsung.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id cf23si8779369ejb.540.2020.06.15.03.43.28; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 03:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@samsung.com header.s=mail20170921 header.b="LbFOM0G/"; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=samsung.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729590AbgFOKn2 (ORCPT + 3 others); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:43:28 -0400 Received: from mailout2.w1.samsung.com ([210.118.77.12]:53470 "EHLO mailout2.w1.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729379AbgFOKn1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Jun 2020 06:43:27 -0400 Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.206]) by mailout2.w1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200615104324euoutp02405de6e26212dde2afa0129ea645860b~YsahBK1Ad0329003290euoutp029 for ; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:43:24 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 mailout2.w1.samsung.com 20200615104324euoutp02405de6e26212dde2afa0129ea645860b~YsahBK1Ad0329003290euoutp029 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=samsung.com; s=mail20170921; t=1592217804; bh=Ume2R9kOCSiT6xRyuYVOBL9vk+mkA7/GR3/GWXOOsAM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:From; b=LbFOM0G/9B6ZX1VS3AIaeT/VXHy9msAoTjZ6y6nqaG4uEmo9yE8hhhvkG5pGcXk+E lEcbSkT/b/SiboL6q7SNfCtukvoENSoQ1W3ZgW3Jqh4jMnTeE1r1JxQX52AcOq0DDI A+Ns6HMhmmfik55hlE85GpG15lrjWGjB9vQoQDyE= Received: from eusmges3new.samsung.com (unknown [203.254.199.245]) by eucas1p1.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200615104324eucas1p127a693edd3ef27945fa7282b85153f33~YsagpdiXE1291812918eucas1p1g; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:43:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eucas1p1.samsung.com ( [182.198.249.206]) by eusmges3new.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id F6.92.60698.BC057EE5; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:24 +0100 (BST) Received: from eusmtrp2.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.139]) by eucas1p2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20200615104323eucas1p2e86189786e06e69d4803769637cb4ec3~YsagPgZE80930309303eucas1p2Z; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:43:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from eusmgms2.samsung.com (unknown [182.198.249.180]) by eusmtrp2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTP id 20200615104323eusmtrp2d4c1f70c95c4467b040662e2000575c9~YsagOprPT0042700427eusmtrp26; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:43:23 +0000 (GMT) X-AuditID: cbfec7f5-a29ff7000001ed1a-6c-5ee750cb0c78 Received: from eusmtip2.samsung.com ( [203.254.199.222]) by eusmgms2.samsung.com (EUCPMTA) with SMTP id 51.E4.07950.BC057EE5; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 11:43:23 +0100 (BST) Received: from AMDC2765.digital.local (unknown [106.120.51.73]) by eusmtip2.samsung.com (KnoxPortal) with ESMTPA id 20200615104322eusmtip22087c77c9d97416aa5322a4b6de59aac~YsafiDfqV0900009000eusmtip21; Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:43:22 +0000 (GMT) From: Marek Szyprowski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown Cc: Marek Szyprowski , Liam Girdwood , Dmitry Osipenko , Lucas Stach , Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Viresh Kumar , peron.clem@gmail.com, Nishanth Menon , Stephen Boyd , Vincent Guittot , Rafael Wysocki , linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, Chanwoo Choi , Saravana Kannan Subject: [PATCH v4] soc: samsung: Add simple voltage coupler for Exynos5800 Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 12:43:15 +0200 Message-Id: <20200615104315.17200-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA0VSeyyVYRjv/W7no46+DuOlxnYWU5PL2HqbFLL1LatprbU1l075xim3ne8g bTUxDmdIujCpgz9kJJfMfUhyNByNQjvOytgUYXLpMpfO8VH//Z7fZb9nzx4alzSSdrQ8Rskp YmRRUsqcaOj5rTvSHzQd6j5bj6HagmoSPZqYotDo8jSJKhcnARocrBGhL08/YWj1QwaGhluK KLSU3Q1QwWA7hqq6DSL0/dcAhvTPhgnU3zdEInXXOoU2RmoJlNG9iqPaFdZXwjYXGkRscV08 W1eRSbHjI20Ue2/dna3/qCLYnPoKwGrHGjF2qc4+yOyy+fFwLkqewCncTlwxj/zcM4DFtV24 aehX48lg7JQamNGQ8YKqkjSgBua0hCkH0KDKxYVhGUDNi0XM5JIwSwAmV17aSeSMpm+bngPY Xf6VEEzGRKbG0YQpxgOq59SUCVsxIbD3RxlpCuDMOwIW9ZYDk2DJBMI0XeuWiWAcYVPpwhYW Mz6wTbeACW0OsLKmc6sNMu0iuNZZigtCANTMp5ACtoQz2nqRgA/AzWYNJgRSAZzQVYmEIQvA 4ZQCILi84bjuj7GONu50CFa3uAm0HyzSpG7RkLGAY3P7TDRuhHkN+bhAi2FGukRwO8FC7ct/ ta/fD22vxsK71WmkcJQQWPDkMZkL7Av/dxUDUAFsuHg+OoLjPWO4RFdeFs3Hx0S4XouNrgPG d+rb0K40gfa1q12AoYF0j3iX8bUkpCyBT4ruApDGpVZi/4G+UIk4XJZ0i1PEhiniozi+C+yn CamN2LP0W4iEiZApuRscF8cpdlSMNrNLBrvnX3VYyR3O2k4lYk4TJx+s6sPK3hwNPEbdL7kT OGmhz8tW5WUkbuamOAcE5+rRqkIZyu7tD9afcaGyZxyAvON0qr3S5e1IGemlarXW+rpnkvLs n2Uu+daeF51zbjetG8ycm23P+7mmRYgdZs8xHrVZ3vxU8EOflev+AcqD7lKCj5R5HMYVvOwv cmstWUoDAAA= X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFupjkeLIzCtJLcpLzFFi42I5/e/4Pd3TAc/jDL79VbLYOGM9q8XUh0/Y LK5/ec5qsfrjY0aL8+c3sFs8mHuTyeLblQ4mi8u75rBZfO49wmgx4/w+Jou1R+6yW7z5cZbJ 4va8yywWZ05fYrXoOvSXzeLftY0sFh1HvjFbbPzq4SDksXPWXXaPBZtKPTat6mTzuHNtD5tH /18Djy1X21k8+rasYvQ4fmM7k8fnTXIBnFF6NkX5pSWpChn5xSW2StGGFkZ6hpYWekYmlnqG xuaxVkamSvp2NimpOZllqUX6dgl6GfePnWUq2BNccfdMF3MD4w3nLkZODgkBE4m+623MXYxc HEICSxklji86zQyRkJE4Oa2BFcIWlvhzrYsNougTo0TrlMfsIAk2AUOJrrcgCU4OEYF4idP/ T7CDFDELXGWR+N/QDtYtLOAt0XpuN1gRi4CqxI5F78FsXgFbiT3n3jNBbJCXWL3hAPMERp4F jAyrGEVSS4tz03OLjfSKE3OLS/PS9ZLzczcxAuNi27GfW3Ywdr0LPsQowMGoxMNrEfosTog1 say4MvcQowQHs5IIr9PZ03FCvCmJlVWpRfnxRaU5qcWHGE2Blk9klhJNzgfGbF5JvKGpobmF paG5sbmxmYWSOG+HwMEYIYH0xJLU7NTUgtQimD4mDk6pBsZWJu41GRXdqyxcVrhcYfjpffST 8yEFvdRn7UJfZDfe/3dyjkDvvRY3dhUu7ffb1r4vuhTqdObfmez0CfyTpPPkE+VeNccK7teI OmLwsu6ksvur4B6NSR4vPy7rOp9r4LI093pRSXL6jOp6vSeVeQ7/KjYEcCXtb+Zd+PGslK26 U2XWtfL71kosxRmJhlrMRcWJAAiCb5KhAgAA X-CMS-MailID: 20200615104323eucas1p2e86189786e06e69d4803769637cb4ec3 X-Msg-Generator: CA X-RootMTR: 20200615104323eucas1p2e86189786e06e69d4803769637cb4ec3 X-EPHeader: CA CMS-TYPE: 201P X-CMS-RootMailID: 20200615104323eucas1p2e86189786e06e69d4803769637cb4ec3 References: Sender: linux-samsung-soc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org Add a simple custom voltage regulator coupler for Exynos5800 SoCs, which require coupling between "vdd_arm" and "vdd_int" regulators. This coupler ensures that the voltage values don't go below the bootloader-selected operation point during the boot process until a the clients sets their constraints. It is achieved by assuming minimal voltage value equal to the current value if no constraints are set. This also ensures proper voltage balancing if any of the client driver is missing. The balancing code comes from the regulator/core.c with the additional logic for handling regulators without client constraints applied added. Reviewed-by: Dmitry Osipenko Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski --- This patch is yet another attempt to fix the regulator coupling on Exynos5800/5422 SoCs. Here are links to the previous attempts and discussions: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/20191008101709.qVNy8eijBi0LynOteWFMnTg4GUwKG599n6OyYoX1Abs@z/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191017102758.8104-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1589528491.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/20200528131130.17984-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/linux-samsung-soc/57cf3a15-5d9b-7636-4c69-60742e8cfae6@samsung.com/ https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200605063724.9030-1-m.szyprowski@samsung.com/ The problem is with "vdd_int" regulator coupled with "vdd_arm" on Odroid XU3/XU4 boards family. "vdd_arm" is handled by CPUfreq. "vdd_int" is handled by devfreq. CPUfreq initialized quite early during boot and it starts changing OPPs and "vdd_arm" value. Sometimes CPU activity during boot goes down and some low-frequency OPPs are selected, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_arm". This happens before devfreq applies its requirements on "vdd_int". Regulator balancing code reduces "vdd_arm" voltage value, what in turn causes lowering "vdd_int" value to the lowest possible value. This is much below the operation point of the wcore bus, which still runs at the highest frequency. The issue was hard to notice because in the most cases the board managed to boot properly, even when the regulator was set to lowest value allowed by the regulator constraints. However, it caused some random issues, which can be observed as "Unhandled prefetch abort" or low USB stability. Handling this case in the generic code has been rejected, so the only way to ensure the desired behavior on Exynos5800-based SoCs is to make a custom regulator coupler driver. I've tried hard to extract some common code to simplify the exynos-regulator-coupler driver as much as possible, but the difference between it and the generic code is so deep that this approach failed, so indead I simply copied and modified the balancing code. Best regards Marek Szyprowski --- arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig | 1 + drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig | 3 + drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile | 1 + .../soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c | 221 ++++++++++++++++++ 4 files changed, 226 insertions(+) create mode 100644 drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c -- 2.17.1 diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig index 76838255b5fa..f185cd3d4c62 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/Kconfig @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ config SOC_EXYNOS5800 bool "Samsung EXYNOS5800" default y depends on SOC_EXYNOS5420 + select EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER config EXYNOS_MCPM bool diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig index 19c4d3f1437b..5d7819b52eed 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Kconfig @@ -43,4 +43,7 @@ config EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS bool "Exynos PM domains" if COMPILE_TEST depends on PM_GENERIC_DOMAINS || COMPILE_TEST +config EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER + bool "Exynos SoC Regulator Coupler" if COMPILE_TEST + depends on ARCH_EXYNOS || COMPILE_TEST endif diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile index 31db65cb7aa3..93285faec416 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/Makefile @@ -10,3 +10,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU_ARM_DRIVERS) += exynos3250-pmu.o exynos4-pmu.o \ exynos5250-pmu.o exynos5420-pmu.o obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PMU_ARM64_DRIVERS) += exynos-pm.o exynos5433-pmu.o obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_PM_DOMAINS) += pm_domains.o +obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS_REGULATOR_COUPLER) += exynos-regulator-coupler.o diff --git a/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3cafc1738eb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/drivers/soc/samsung/exynos-regulator-coupler.c @@ -0,0 +1,221 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +/* + * Copyright (c) 2020 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. + * http://www.samsung.com/ + * Author: Marek Szyprowski + * + * Simplified generic voltage coupler from regulator core.c + * The main difference is that it keeps current regulator voltage + * if consumers didn't apply their constraints yet. + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +static int regulator_get_optimal_voltage(struct regulator_dev *rdev, + int *current_uV, + int *min_uV, int *max_uV, + suspend_state_t state) +{ + struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc; + struct regulator_dev **c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs; + struct regulation_constraints *constraints = rdev->constraints; + int desired_min_uV = 0, desired_max_uV = INT_MAX; + int max_current_uV = 0, min_current_uV = INT_MAX; + int highest_min_uV = 0, target_uV, possible_uV; + int i, ret, max_spread, n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled; + bool done; + + *current_uV = -1; + + /* Find highest min desired voltage */ + for (i = 0; i < n_coupled; i++) { + int tmp_min = 0; + int tmp_max = INT_MAX; + + lockdep_assert_held_once(&c_rdevs[i]->mutex.base); + + ret = regulator_check_consumers(c_rdevs[i], + &tmp_min, + &tmp_max, state); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + if (tmp_min == 0) { + ret = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(c_rdevs[i]); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + tmp_min = ret; + } + + /* apply constraints */ + ret = regulator_check_voltage(c_rdevs[i], &tmp_min, &tmp_max); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + + highest_min_uV = max(highest_min_uV, tmp_min); + + if (i == 0) { + desired_min_uV = tmp_min; + desired_max_uV = tmp_max; + } + } + + max_spread = constraints->max_spread[0]; + + /* + * Let target_uV be equal to the desired one if possible. + * If not, set it to minimum voltage, allowed by other coupled + * regulators. + */ + target_uV = max(desired_min_uV, highest_min_uV - max_spread); + + /* + * Find min and max voltages, which currently aren't violating + * max_spread. + */ + for (i = 1; i < n_coupled; i++) { + int tmp_act; + + tmp_act = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(c_rdevs[i]); + if (tmp_act < 0) + return tmp_act; + + min_current_uV = min(tmp_act, min_current_uV); + max_current_uV = max(tmp_act, max_current_uV); + } + + /* + * Correct target voltage, so as it currently isn't + * violating max_spread + */ + possible_uV = max(target_uV, max_current_uV - max_spread); + possible_uV = min(possible_uV, min_current_uV + max_spread); + + if (possible_uV > desired_max_uV) + return -EINVAL; + + done = (possible_uV == target_uV); + desired_min_uV = possible_uV; + + /* Set current_uV if wasn't done earlier in the code and if necessary */ + if (*current_uV == -1) { + ret = regulator_get_voltage_rdev(rdev); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + *current_uV = ret; + } + + *min_uV = desired_min_uV; + *max_uV = desired_max_uV; + + return done; +} + +static int exynos_coupler_balance_voltage(struct regulator_coupler *coupler, + struct regulator_dev *rdev, + suspend_state_t state) +{ + struct regulator_dev **c_rdevs; + struct regulator_dev *best_rdev; + struct coupling_desc *c_desc = &rdev->coupling_desc; + int i, ret, n_coupled, best_min_uV, best_max_uV, best_c_rdev; + unsigned int delta, best_delta; + unsigned long c_rdev_done = 0; + bool best_c_rdev_done; + + c_rdevs = c_desc->coupled_rdevs; + n_coupled = c_desc->n_coupled; + + /* + * Find the best possible voltage change on each loop. Leave the loop + * if there isn't any possible change. + */ + do { + best_c_rdev_done = false; + best_delta = 0; + best_min_uV = 0; + best_max_uV = 0; + best_c_rdev = 0; + best_rdev = NULL; + + /* + * Find highest difference between optimal voltage + * and current voltage. + */ + for (i = 0; i < n_coupled; i++) { + /* + * optimal_uV is the best voltage that can be set for + * i-th regulator at the moment without violating + * max_spread constraint in order to balance + * the coupled voltages. + */ + int optimal_uV = 0, optimal_max_uV = 0, current_uV = 0; + + if (test_bit(i, &c_rdev_done)) + continue; + + ret = regulator_get_optimal_voltage(c_rdevs[i], + ¤t_uV, + &optimal_uV, + &optimal_max_uV, + state); + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + + delta = abs(optimal_uV - current_uV); + + if (delta && best_delta <= delta) { + best_c_rdev_done = ret; + best_delta = delta; + best_rdev = c_rdevs[i]; + best_min_uV = optimal_uV; + best_max_uV = optimal_max_uV; + best_c_rdev = i; + } + } + + /* Nothing to change, return successfully */ + if (!best_rdev) { + ret = 0; + goto out; + } + + ret = regulator_set_voltage_rdev(best_rdev, best_min_uV, + best_max_uV, state); + + if (ret < 0) + goto out; + + if (best_c_rdev_done) + set_bit(best_c_rdev, &c_rdev_done); + + } while (n_coupled > 1); + +out: + return ret; +} + +static int exynos_coupler_attach(struct regulator_coupler *coupler, + struct regulator_dev *rdev) +{ + return 0; +} + +static struct regulator_coupler exynos_coupler = { + .attach_regulator = exynos_coupler_attach, + .balance_voltage = exynos_coupler_balance_voltage, +}; + +static int __init exynos_coupler_init(void) +{ + if (!of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5800")) + return 0; + + return regulator_coupler_register(&exynos_coupler); +} +arch_initcall(exynos_coupler_init);