Message ID | 20240707231331.3433340-4-sunyeal.hong@samsung.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | initial clock support for exynosauto v920 SoC | expand |
Hello Sunyeal, > -----Original Message----- > From: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 4:44 AM > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; > Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob > Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for pll_531x > > pll531x PLL is used in Exynos Auto v920 SoC for shared pll. > pll531x: Integer/fractional PLL with mid frequency FVCO (800 to 3120 MHz) > > PLL531x > FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) * FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) > Any reason for not mentioning equation for integer PLL? > Signed-off-by: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > --- Anyway, LGTM, Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 45 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c index > 4be879ab917e..b3bcef074ab7 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > @@ -1261,6 +1261,48 @@ static const struct clk_ops > samsung_pll2650xx_clk_min_ops = { > .recalc_rate = samsung_pll2650xx_recalc_rate, }; > > +/* > + * PLL531X Clock Type > + */ > +/* Maximum lock time can be 500 * PDIV cycles */ > +#define PLL531X_LOCK_FACTOR (500) > +#define PLL531X_MDIV_MASK (0x3FF) > +#define PLL531X_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) > +#define PLL531X_SDIV_MASK (0x7) > +#define PLL531X_FDIV_MASK (0xFFFF) > +#define PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT (16) > +#define PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT (8) > +#define PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT (0) > + > +static unsigned long samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > + unsigned long parent_rate) > +{ > + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); > + u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con0, pll_con8; > + s32 fdiv; > + u64 fout = parent_rate; > + > + pll_con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); > + pll_con8 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 20); > + mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_MDIV_MASK; > + pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_PDIV_MASK; > + sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_SDIV_MASK; > + fdiv = (s32)(pll_con8 & PLL531X_FDIV_MASK); > + > + if (fdiv >> 31) > + mdiv--; > + > + fout *= ((u64)mdiv << 24) + (fdiv >> 8); > + do_div(fout, (pdiv << sdiv)); > + fout >>= 24; > + > + return (unsigned long)fout; > +} > + > +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll531x_clk_ops = { > + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate, }; > + > static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_clk_provider > *ctx, > const struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk) { > @@ -1394,6 +1436,9 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct > samsung_clk_provider *ctx, > else > init.ops = &samsung_pll2650xx_clk_ops; > break; > + case pll_531x: > + init.ops = &samsung_pll531x_clk_ops; > + break; > default: > pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n", > __func__, pll_clk->name); > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > index ffd3d52c0dec..ce9d6f21f993 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { > pll_0516x, > pll_0517x, > pll_0518x, > + pll_531x, > }; > > #define PLL_RATE(_fin, _m, _p, _s, _k, _ks) \ > -- > 2.45.2
Hello Alim, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 8:58 PM > To: 'Sunyeal Hong' <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; 'Chanwoo > Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > pll_531x > > Hello Sunyeal, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 4:44 AM > > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki > > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; Alim > > Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob > > Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > pll_531x > > > > pll531x PLL is used in Exynos Auto v920 SoC for shared pll. > > pll531x: Integer/fractional PLL with mid frequency FVCO (800 to 3120 > > MHz) > > > > PLL531x > > FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) * FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) > > > Any reason for not mentioning equation for integer PLL? > If the F value is 0, it operates as an integer PLL. > > Signed-off-by: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > --- > Anyway, LGTM, > > Reviewed-by: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 45 > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > > b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c index > > 4be879ab917e..b3bcef074ab7 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > > @@ -1261,6 +1261,48 @@ static const struct clk_ops > > samsung_pll2650xx_clk_min_ops = { > > .recalc_rate = samsung_pll2650xx_recalc_rate, }; > > > > +/* > > + * PLL531X Clock Type > > + */ > > +/* Maximum lock time can be 500 * PDIV cycles */ > > +#define PLL531X_LOCK_FACTOR (500) > > +#define PLL531X_MDIV_MASK (0x3FF) > > +#define PLL531X_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) > > +#define PLL531X_SDIV_MASK (0x7) > > +#define PLL531X_FDIV_MASK (0xFFFF) > > +#define PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT (16) > > +#define PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT (8) > > +#define PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT (0) > > + > > +static unsigned long samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > > + unsigned long parent_rate) > > +{ > > + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); > > + u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con0, pll_con8; > > + s32 fdiv; > > + u64 fout = parent_rate; > > + > > + pll_con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); > > + pll_con8 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 20); > > + mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_MDIV_MASK; > > + pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_PDIV_MASK; > > + sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_SDIV_MASK; > > + fdiv = (s32)(pll_con8 & PLL531X_FDIV_MASK); > > + > > + if (fdiv >> 31) > > + mdiv--; > > + > > + fout *= ((u64)mdiv << 24) + (fdiv >> 8); > > + do_div(fout, (pdiv << sdiv)); > > + fout >>= 24; > > + > > + return (unsigned long)fout; > > +} > > + > > +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll531x_clk_ops = { > > + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate, }; > > + > > static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct > > samsung_clk_provider *ctx, > > const struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk) { @@ - > 1394,6 +1436,9 @@ > > static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct > > samsung_clk_provider *ctx, > > else > > init.ops = &samsung_pll2650xx_clk_ops; > > break; > > + case pll_531x: > > + init.ops = &samsung_pll531x_clk_ops; > > + break; > > default: > > pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n", > > __func__, pll_clk->name); > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > > b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h index ffd3d52c0dec..ce9d6f21f993 > > 100644 > > --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > > +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { > > pll_0516x, > > pll_0517x, > > pll_0518x, > > + pll_531x, > > }; > > > > #define PLL_RATE(_fin, _m, _p, _s, _k, _ks) \ > > -- > > 2.45.2 >
Hello Sunyeal, > -----Original Message----- > From: sunyeal.hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 7:50 AM > To: 'Alim Akhtar' <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; > 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for pll_531x > > Hello Alim, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 8:58 PM > > To: 'Sunyeal Hong' <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; > > 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > pll_531x > > > > Hello Sunyeal, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 4:44 AM > > > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki > > > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi > <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; Alim > > > Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette > > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob > > > Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sunyeal Hong > > > <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > > pll_531x > > > > > > pll531x PLL is used in Exynos Auto v920 SoC for shared pll. > > > pll531x: Integer/fractional PLL with mid frequency FVCO (800 to 3120 > > > MHz) > > > > > > PLL531x > > > FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) * FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) > > > > > Any reason for not mentioning equation for integer PLL? > > > If the F value is 0, it operates as an integer PLL. Thanks for clarification, it is good to mention the same in the commit message. [snip] > > > -- > > > 2.45.2 > > >
Hello Alim, > -----Original Message----- > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 11:35 AM > To: 'sunyeal.hong' <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; 'Chanwoo > Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux- > kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > pll_531x > > Hello Sunyeal, > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: sunyeal.hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2024 7:50 AM > > To: 'Alim Akhtar' <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; > > 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > pll_531x > > > > Hello Alim, > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com> > > > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 8:58 PM > > > To: 'Sunyeal Hong' <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; 'Krzysztof Kozlowski' > > > <krzk@kernel.org>; 'Sylwester Nawrocki' <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; > > > 'Chanwoo Choi' <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; 'Michael Turquette' > > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; 'Stephen Boyd' <sboyd@kernel.org>; 'Rob > > > Herring' <robh@kernel.org>; 'Conor Dooley' <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org > > > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > > pll_531x > > > > > > Hello Sunyeal, > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 4:44 AM > > > > To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki > > > > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi > > <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; Alim > > > > Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette > > > > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob > > > > Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org> > > > > Cc: linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; > > > > devicetree@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > > > > linux- kernel@vger.kernel.org; Sunyeal Hong > > > > <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > > > > Subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > > > > pll_531x > > > > > > > > pll531x PLL is used in Exynos Auto v920 SoC for shared pll. > > > > pll531x: Integer/fractional PLL with mid frequency FVCO (800 to > > > > 3120 > > > > MHz) > > > > > > > > PLL531x > > > > FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) * FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) > > > > > > > Any reason for not mentioning equation for integer PLL? > > > > > If the F value is 0, it operates as an integer PLL. > Thanks for clarification, it is good to mention the same in the commit > message. > Okay. I will update comment for integer PLL description. > [snip] > > > > -- > > > > 2.45.2 > > > > > > Thanks, Sunyeal Hong
Hi Sunyeal, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Sunyeal-Hong/dt-bindings-clock-add-Exynos-Auto-v920-SoC-CMU-bindings/20240708-072150 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240707231331.3433340-4-sunyeal.hong%40samsung.com patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for pll_531x config: arc-randconfig-r071-20240719 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240720/202407200028.5AADGhmj-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202407200028.5AADGhmj-lkp@intel.com/ smatch warnings: drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c:1292 samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate() warn: mask and shift to zero: expr='fdiv >> 31' vim +1292 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1277 static unsigned long samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1278 unsigned long parent_rate) 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1279 { 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1280 struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1281 u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con0, pll_con8; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1282 s32 fdiv; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1283 u64 fout = parent_rate; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1284 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1285 pll_con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1286 pll_con8 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 20); 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1287 mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_MDIV_MASK; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1288 pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_PDIV_MASK; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1289 sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_SDIV_MASK; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1290 fdiv = (s32)(pll_con8 & PLL531X_FDIV_MASK); PLL531X_FDIV_MASK is 0xffff. Was this supposed to be a cast to s16 instead of s32? Why is fdiv signed? Shifting negative values is undefined in C. 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1291 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 @1292 if (fdiv >> 31) It's really unclear what's happening here. If I had to guess, I'd say that this was testing to see if fdiv was negative. 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1293 mdiv--; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1294 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1295 fout *= ((u64)mdiv << 24) + (fdiv >> 8); ^^^^^^^^^ More shifting. 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1296 do_div(fout, (pdiv << sdiv)); 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1297 fout >>= 24; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1298 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1299 return (unsigned long)fout; 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1300 }
Hello Dan, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2024 3:48 AM > To: oe-kbuild@lists.linux.dev; Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com>; > Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>; Sylwester Nawrocki > <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>; Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@samsung.com>; Alim > Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>; Michael Turquette > <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>; Rob Herring > <robh@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org> > Cc: lkp@intel.com; oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev; linux-samsung- > soc@vger.kernel.org; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; > linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > pll_531x > > Hi Sunyeal, > > kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: > > https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] > > url: https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=ccd9a91d-93426779-ccd82252- > 000babda0201-b5083e850ec85e2b&q=1&e=dc8f0621-d4ce-45e5-8254- > 9a5da18037d5&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fintel-lab- > lkp%2Flinux%2Fcommits%2FSunyeal-Hong%2Fdt-bindings-clock-add-Exynos-Auto- > v920-SoC-CMU-bindings%2F20240708-072150 > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git > for-next > patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240707231331.3433340-4- > sunyeal.hong%40samsung.com > patch subject: [PATCH v2 3/4] clk: samsung: clk-pll: Add support for > pll_531x > config: arc-randconfig-r071-20240719 (https://download.01.org/0day- > ci/archive/20240720/202407200028.5AADGhmj-lkp@intel.com/config) > compiler: arc-elf-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0 > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new > version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > | Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org> > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202407200028.5AADGhmj-lkp@intel.com/ > > smatch warnings: > drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c:1292 samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate() warn: > mask and shift to zero: expr='fdiv >> 31' > > vim +1292 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c > > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1277 static unsigned long > samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1278 > unsigned long parent_rate) > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1279 { > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1280 struct samsung_clk_pll *pll > = to_clk_pll(hw); > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1281 u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, > pll_con0, pll_con8; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1282 s32 fdiv; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1283 u64 fout = parent_rate; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1284 > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1285 pll_con0 = > readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1286 pll_con8 = > readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 20); > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1287 mdiv = (pll_con0 >> > PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_MDIV_MASK; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1288 pdiv = (pll_con0 >> > PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_PDIV_MASK; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1289 sdiv = (pll_con0 >> > PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_SDIV_MASK; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1290 fdiv = (s32)(pll_con8 & > PLL531X_FDIV_MASK); > > PLL531X_FDIV_MASK is 0xffff. Was this supposed to be a cast to s16 > instead of s32? Why is fdiv signed? Shifting negative values is undefined > in C. > As you reviewed, I will change fdiv to u32 type and modify it to use a mask of 0xffffffff. > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1291 > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 @1292 if (fdiv >> 31) > > It's really unclear what's happening here. If I had to guess, I'd say > that this was testing to see if fdiv was negative. > the bit of fdiv 31 is a bit that can check negative numbers. In this case, the mdiv is first subtracting 1. Please refer to the formula of commit description. FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) x FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) for fractional PLL > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1293 mdiv--; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1294 > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1295 fout *= ((u64)mdiv << 24) + > (fdiv >> 8); > ^^^^^^^^^ More > shifting. > > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1296 do_div(fout, (pdiv << > sdiv)); > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1297 fout >>= 24; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1298 > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1299 return (unsigned long)fout; > 5c788df7a25de7 Sunyeal Hong 2024-07-08 1300 } > > -- > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service > https://protect2.fireeye.com/v1/url?k=8c19bb62-d3827506-8c18302d- > 000babda0201-2f20ef1ee86cc8ae&q=1&e=dc8f0621-d4ce-45e5-8254- > 9a5da18037d5&u=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fintel%2Flkp-tests%2Fwiki > I will fix the patch and update again. Thanks, Sunyeal Hong.
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c index 4be879ab917e..b3bcef074ab7 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c @@ -1261,6 +1261,48 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll2650xx_clk_min_ops = { .recalc_rate = samsung_pll2650xx_recalc_rate, }; +/* + * PLL531X Clock Type + */ +/* Maximum lock time can be 500 * PDIV cycles */ +#define PLL531X_LOCK_FACTOR (500) +#define PLL531X_MDIV_MASK (0x3FF) +#define PLL531X_PDIV_MASK (0x3F) +#define PLL531X_SDIV_MASK (0x7) +#define PLL531X_FDIV_MASK (0xFFFF) +#define PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT (16) +#define PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT (8) +#define PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT (0) + +static unsigned long samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, + unsigned long parent_rate) +{ + struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw); + u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con0, pll_con8; + s32 fdiv; + u64 fout = parent_rate; + + pll_con0 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg); + pll_con8 = readl_relaxed(pll->con_reg + 20); + mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_MDIV_MASK; + pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_PDIV_MASK; + sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL531X_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL531X_SDIV_MASK; + fdiv = (s32)(pll_con8 & PLL531X_FDIV_MASK); + + if (fdiv >> 31) + mdiv--; + + fout *= ((u64)mdiv << 24) + (fdiv >> 8); + do_div(fout, (pdiv << sdiv)); + fout >>= 24; + + return (unsigned long)fout; +} + +static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll531x_clk_ops = { + .recalc_rate = samsung_pll531x_recalc_rate, +}; + static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx, const struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk) { @@ -1394,6 +1436,9 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_clk_provider *ctx, else init.ops = &samsung_pll2650xx_clk_ops; break; + case pll_531x: + init.ops = &samsung_pll531x_clk_ops; + break; default: pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n", __func__, pll_clk->name); diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h index ffd3d52c0dec..ce9d6f21f993 100644 --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ enum samsung_pll_type { pll_0516x, pll_0517x, pll_0518x, + pll_531x, }; #define PLL_RATE(_fin, _m, _p, _s, _k, _ks) \
pll531x PLL is used in Exynos Auto v920 SoC for shared pll. pll531x: Integer/fractional PLL with mid frequency FVCO (800 to 3120 MHz) PLL531x FOUT = (MDIV + F/2^32-F[31]) * FIN/(PDIV x 2^SDIV) Signed-off-by: Sunyeal Hong <sunyeal.hong@samsung.com> --- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h | 1 + 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)