From patchwork Tue Apr 6 23:06:36 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Muneendra Kumar X-Patchwork-Id: 417110 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF42C433ED for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3565613CC for ; Wed, 7 Apr 2021 05:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1345338AbhDGF7l (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 01:59:41 -0400 Received: from saphodev.broadcom.com ([192.19.232.172]:39390 "EHLO relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1345353AbhDGF7i (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Apr 2021 01:59:38 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [10.157.2.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28882433B; Tue, 6 Apr 2021 22:59:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 relay.smtp-ext.broadcom.com F28882433B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=broadcom.com; s=dkimrelay; t=1617775169; bh=X9vCVzGkXkP4A2eFeaHZWC4N0/75YPQ95C7bRlGTs5E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KnfDQc8NFRzRU83xT4KDuNwfulLMMVbQjaQRNompecxEZSZ3Lyd3sApfvyPfRWV14 18kOjqEQqb/7C3ec9fSK4ULi8EFLitxQhooifjiTjsfG835nI9d5ULx82hM2rAibBe jJFMKPHNwsfNpU9PH0Ihg/tQSCLhzBSwjswIqDio= From: Muneendra To: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, tj@kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, hare@suse.de Cc: jsmart2021@gmail.com, emilne@redhat.com, mkumar@redhat.com, Gaurav Srivastava Subject: [PATCH v9 12/13] lpfc: vmid: Adding qfpa and vmid timeout check in worker thread Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2021 04:36:36 +0530 Message-Id: <1617750397-26466-13-git-send-email-muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.8.3.1 In-Reply-To: <1617750397-26466-1-git-send-email-muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com> References: <1617750397-26466-1-git-send-email-muneendra.kumar@broadcom.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: Gaurav Srivastava This patch add the periodic check for issuing of qfpa command and vmid timeout in the worker thread. The inactivity timeout check is added via the timer function. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke Signed-off-by: Gaurav Srivastava Signed-off-by: James Smart --- v9: No change v8: checked the function return value v7: No change v6: Added Forward declarations and removed unused variable v5: No change v4: No change v3: No change v2: Ported the patch on top of 5.10/scsi-queue --- drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 43 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c index 4cf1bc418bea..53712e30754a 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_hbadisc.c @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static void lpfc_unregister_fcfi_cmpl(struct lpfc_hba *, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *); static int lpfc_fcf_inuse(struct lpfc_hba *); static void lpfc_mbx_cmpl_read_sparam(struct lpfc_hba *, LPFC_MBOXQ_t *); static void lpfc_check_inactive_vmid(struct lpfc_hba *phba); +static void lpfc_check_vmid_qfpa_issue(struct lpfc_hba *phba); static int lpfc_valid_xpt_node(struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp) @@ -433,6 +434,32 @@ lpfc_dev_loss_tmo_handler(struct lpfc_nodelist *ndlp) return fcf_inuse; } +static void lpfc_check_vmid_qfpa_issue(struct lpfc_hba *phba) +{ + struct lpfc_vport *vport; + struct lpfc_vport **vports; + int i; + + vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba); + if (!vports) + return; + + for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports; i++) { + if ((!vports[i]) && (i == 0)) + vport = phba->pport; + else + vport = vports[i]; + if (!vport) + break; + + if (vport->vmid_flag & LPFC_VMID_ISSUE_QFPA) { + if (!lpfc_issue_els_qfpa(vport)) + vport->vmid_flag &= ~LPFC_VMID_ISSUE_QFPA; + } + } + lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports); +} + /** * lpfc_sli4_post_dev_loss_tmo_handler - SLI4 post devloss timeout handler * @phba: Pointer to hba context object. @@ -753,6 +780,22 @@ lpfc_work_done(struct lpfc_hba *phba) if (ha_copy & HA_LATT) lpfc_handle_latt(phba); + /* Handle VMID Events */ + if (lpfc_is_vmid_enabled(phba)) { + if (phba->pport->work_port_events & + WORKER_CHECK_VMID_ISSUE_QFPA) { + lpfc_check_vmid_qfpa_issue(phba); + phba->pport->work_port_events &= + ~WORKER_CHECK_VMID_ISSUE_QFPA; + } + if (phba->pport->work_port_events & + WORKER_CHECK_INACTIVE_VMID) { + lpfc_check_inactive_vmid(phba); + phba->pport->work_port_events &= + ~WORKER_CHECK_INACTIVE_VMID; + } + } + /* Process SLI4 events */ if (phba->pci_dev_grp == LPFC_PCI_DEV_OC) { if (phba->hba_flag & HBA_RRQ_ACTIVE)