From patchwork Tue Oct 18 11:16:00 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: John Garry X-Patchwork-Id: 616680 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1A7C433FE for ; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 10:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229845AbiJRKp7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:45:59 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59250 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229914AbiJRKpy (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 06:45:54 -0400 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com (frasgout.his.huawei.com [185.176.79.56]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318F4B5141; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 03:45:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4Ms9Rj5DQRz67nGj; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 18:42:41 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) by fraeml715-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 12:45:50 +0200 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.69.192.58) by lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:45:47 +0100 From: John Garry To: , , , CC: , , , , , , John Garry Subject: [PATCH v4 4/7] scsi: pm8001: Remove pm8001_tag_init() Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 19:16:00 +0800 Message-ID: <1666091763-11023-5-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1666091763-11023-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> References: <1666091763-11023-1-git-send-email-john.garry@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.69.192.58] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To lhrpeml500003.china.huawei.com (7.191.162.67) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: Igor Pylypiv In commit 5a141315ed7c ("scsi: pm80xx: Increase the number of outstanding I/O supported to 1024") the pm8001_ha->tags allocation was moved into pm8001_init_ccb_tag(). This changed the execution order of allocation. pm8001_tag_init() used to be called after the pm8001_ha->tags allocation and now it is called before the allocation. Before: pm8001_pci_probe() `--> pm8001_pci_alloc() `--> pm8001_alloc() `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...) `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // OK: tags are allocated After: pm8001_pci_probe() `--> pm8001_pci_alloc() | `--> pm8001_alloc() | `--> pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); // NOK: tags are not allocated | `--> pm8001_init_ccb_tag() `--> pm8001_ha->tags = kzalloc(...) // today it is bitmap_zalloc() Since pm8001_ha->tags_num is zero when pm8001_tag_init() is called it does nothing. Tags memory is allocated with bitmap_zalloc() so there is no need to manually clear each bit with pm8001_tag_free(). Reviewed-by: Changyuan Lyu Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv Signed-off-by: John Garry Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal Reviewed-by: Jack Wang Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke --- drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c | 2 -- drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c | 7 ------- drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c index 2ff2fac1e403..040a8280f23b 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_init.c @@ -436,8 +436,6 @@ static int pm8001_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, atomic_set(&pm8001_ha->devices[i].running_req, 0); } pm8001_ha->flags = PM8001F_INIT_TIME; - /* Initialize tags */ - pm8001_tag_init(pm8001_ha); return 0; err_out_nodev: diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c index 51230b827149..c9fa3328f3fa 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.c @@ -96,13 +96,6 @@ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out) return 0; } -void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha) -{ - int i; - for (i = 0; i < pm8001_ha->tags_num; ++i) - pm8001_tag_free(pm8001_ha, i); -} - /** * pm8001_mem_alloc - allocate memory for pm8001. * @pdev: pci device. diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h index 16a753d5e8a7..ecb98bc5a8d0 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_sas.h @@ -632,7 +632,6 @@ extern struct workqueue_struct *pm8001_wq; /******************** function prototype *********************/ int pm8001_tag_alloc(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, u32 *tag_out); -void pm8001_tag_init(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha); u32 pm8001_get_ncq_tag(struct sas_task *task, u32 *tag); void pm8001_ccb_task_free(struct pm8001_hba_info *pm8001_ha, struct pm8001_ccb_info *ccb);