From patchwork Wed Jun 9 07:16:17 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "libaokun \(A\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 458217 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F2CC47095 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:07:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB1E61354 for ; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 07:07:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231340AbhFIHJG (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:09:06 -0400 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:5461 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234723AbhFIHJE (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Jun 2021 03:09:04 -0400 Received: from dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G0J4f50yNzZdxs; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:04:18 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.88) by dggemv703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.46) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:07:08 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:07:07 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: , Anil Gurumurthy , Sudarsana Kalluru , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" CC: , , , , , , , Hulk Robot Subject: [PATCH -next v2] scsi: bfa: Use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail in bfa_ioc.c Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 15:16:17 +0800 Message-ID: <20210609071617.1338784-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems705-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.182) To dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.88) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail() in bfa_ioc.c. Reported-by: Hulk Robot Signed-off-by: Baokun Li --- V1->V2: CC mailist drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c index 5740302d83ac..077b052aef1a 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_ioc.c @@ -3201,8 +3201,7 @@ bfa_timer_beat(struct bfa_timer_mod_s *mod) elem = (struct bfa_timer_s *) qe; if (elem->timeout <= BFA_TIMER_FREQ) { elem->timeout = 0; - list_del(&elem->qe); - list_add_tail(&elem->qe, &timedout_q); + list_move_tail(&elem->qe, &timedout_q); } else { elem->timeout -= BFA_TIMER_FREQ; }