From patchwork Sun Oct 9 20:18:08 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bean Huo X-Patchwork-Id: 613699 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9CFC4332F for ; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 20:21:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229986AbiJIUVk (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2022 16:21:40 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:57216 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229464AbiJIUVj (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Oct 2022 16:21:39 -0400 X-Greylist: delayed 175 seconds by postgrey-1.37 at lindbergh.monkeyblade.net; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 13:21:37 PDT Received: from mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p02-ob.smtp.rzone.de [85.215.255.80]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09DED1A83D; Sun, 9 Oct 2022 13:21:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1665346716; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=iokpp.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=AQ5tRKniKZUmoOnhRKBBg6EOdWGzLqH8T9IBoyUqMwI=; b=kQTKxjsrMTRQJORxnETedZjmnD0bC/JMpBWg2Rn58IX6x4FO2DZ4z1a9uskMXhkEUw 6L0qVjrOeBRuo9BZuzl2S5ca8O22rzain5kOMhJbqhBngzS/u/Rm+79qtPo9g9t51ZDb jDQSMJ8Voeqv4FB4mzc7XOMTdevniR7xUEKjCJHEAg8EJHnYgXJPh7QbBNvrbfqrVy0x /5Pe8HA2M5rlcJsc+ftvgPVXStdFbHKQbfyVqQAfevCxLES8eBklWuJ6zDSK4i2QuI9B hJYrxRLx3wYb3/QhSVZFthj+ZgjNjvpQjBTWpOLPs6gRzBfe0+Lz7mwAu/9Jitus9IE7 SAFA== Authentication-Results: strato.com; dkim=none X-RZG-AUTH: ":LmkFe0i9dN8c2t4QQyGBB/NDXvjDB6pBSedrgBzPc9DUyubU4DD1QLj68UeUr1+U1h3Wv4Xa/LRChhKO/8hvJt7KzgdI0oSHjzSB" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo01 Received: from linux.speedport.ip by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 48.1.3 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id z90a05y99KIadXw (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 9 Oct 2022 22:18:36 +0200 (CEST) From: Bean Huo To: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, avri.altman@wdc.com, asutoshd@codeaurora.org, jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, stanley.chu@mediatek.com, beanhuo@micron.com, bvanassche@acm.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com, cang@codeaurora.org, daejun7.park@samsung.com Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] scsi: ufs: core: Remove unnecessary if statement Date: Sun, 9 Oct 2022 22:18:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20221009201809.495207-2-beanhuo@iokpp.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.34.1 In-Reply-To: <20221009201809.495207-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de> References: <20221009201809.495207-1-beanhuo@iokpp.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org From: Bean Huo LUs with WB potential support are properly checked in ufshcd_wb_probe() before calling ufshcd_read_unit_desc_param(), so remove this unnecessary if-checkup in ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun() to match its function definition. Signed-off-by: Bean Huo --- drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h index f68ca33f6ac7..2457b005101a 100644 --- a/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h +++ b/drivers/ufs/core/ufshcd-priv.h @@ -300,9 +300,6 @@ static inline bool ufs_is_valid_unit_desc_lun(struct ufs_dev_info *dev_info, pr_err("Max General LU supported by UFS isn't initialized\n"); return false; } - /* WB is available only for the logical unit from 0 to 7 */ - if (param_offset == UNIT_DESC_PARAM_WB_BUF_ALLOC_UNITS) - return lun < UFS_UPIU_MAX_WB_LUN_ID; return lun == UFS_UPIU_RPMB_WLUN || (lun < dev_info->max_lu_supported); }