From patchwork Thu Oct 3 03:53:30 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: mhkelley58@gmail.com X-Patchwork-Id: 832911 Received: from mail-pl1-f171.google.com (mail-pl1-f171.google.com [209.85.214.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00C3B3FE55; Thu, 3 Oct 2024 03:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727927656; cv=none; b=avgnYnDFUWLrD5bSAFb6rCYaO6NgEJcDcGNyXoOsC4HXbpfFaMfrHdJxdurILVryaDawl/HHpEdoQi0jdPtE4CksBcAme03FBjzvh/M1zeIsZVXs2Fcrz331gcDp/iuAu+883xHAHVW5bzmqvgk2vS1Jvdg8VxvpJNPLOdfNF90= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727927656; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pneaunq42UDCs3Bs1TW/8ZciN54md0YfS4FpuQiIs44=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=b6lUd3SoLsbvsh7c7IGpHC5o9vl+A2BPRNRDdP9LkfJbGYPlj8qZEpBdkkUTpxWr4XiL07C1kBkE5S93uz7U1EBsXZfgM/Xry+rMMjqFjK23QIQQ8JCSWFg2v4w3fqgxTiToM+9G+VmjzKHDfcow1LqA+BaQPIuipL7WQVUGRfY= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=HN7o4/xB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.214.171 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HN7o4/xB" Received: by mail-pl1-f171.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20bc506347dso3436475ad.0; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:54:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1727927654; x=1728532454; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cq0XjbGrpMlRn53fkSkj2ZE6QfO3xJ5aVKsySHlaSk8=; b=HN7o4/xBuVpKA/hifZxREWgf7BcmhAJgVp0CEOoBTxoFam8S39rXKbFojJveVPjIKS pNTDiCI0lIQXtq/EvE0361IZnm6n1EmfH/6mh7g8LxzJEwoYDb8K1BYb31u33Bbvbryu LvsMZeyFABIH4EM3y5YTeW9AibI2LlZxL+DwaTEK5J1nJGn+UZSv7xtrxxyIEVZWj4o0 UZqLJls16pBErxAMPMxuoEWepMDrYOiF6mH4yyJAemuh2IDpCsRSYU+UjFO7jbNwL6g8 825JKEbIpcGy7s3hlB2HdMDa0bS9N1g2gPVqp5EBj7q/0C/Q82sfT6HAbzlrixok9coW 014A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1727927654; x=1728532454; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:reply-to:references :in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=cq0XjbGrpMlRn53fkSkj2ZE6QfO3xJ5aVKsySHlaSk8=; b=hVgr3c38qcRwfTQq2Dnju89ceDMi+rFkNpEb7GUJBoOxnFf39GmLOWFJXrSTlkwSyq RPEQMJ7hqAS4S9Se4qabmTG2t988ZkTuJ5L3jP37sIybknl0oi1mXjHlTqkvAD/XqDSQ OWRrT7/BLON7xLMqO5P126vI4b9/+wzOZIee+VlnQtZJa224inMjb20UhgXxM0+s2NZG cznL4JJQ7hG5+XQewJP0r4tYTTGv7wWVFN6qj4dULyRLN01XkbxOOgQNE2k86wzAqxSC XRVIBpus5TfWuQO6/HfC+rmz9riqXAT2LNny1KV7tx2ru8Lj/TIwZNukVit9aVPR3yrY 6qgw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUCcWThjTBz7vRLY8mNgJsxOCuok+nd6RG7EDV1e8luRaWw60qVJ2ufv+l430CfKCWP7N14Xlzzi/kJgKg=@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCULUG9q4oUfOjywZW9RLRbmMIpODc3KFLaGDjQ3u0TTT2W2/ylse30gZijfAYOSHQ30V0cWsFiNUmQFCzW+@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCUexGazJApFmGc00jX8wIEmZPa+UjVeQE90vJCHnlo9/hqJOo5BFb79Sot6uX49c6x8JnabpI7LJqZ/YQ==@vger.kernel.org, AJvYcCVWfN4GuT4tlf9XgxdWk8T/Xwa5sdpW46RkiJ9cG4ESQEwTOFPcEK8ZkFvr2rGYRdr3HcqXVT2S@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Ywys/oNzDfs1EELo2KsXGS4BPTJmg9eThlFnRaoHqSN+fnMLtMx KRu3aY241Z4ksAfTU35EI/k0tyA2IkP1PuKpOU/hCb2ygDPi99DU X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHQarg1wLyg3MVulXjHU7XNbDYC9jQJBTn5bjTS6CS6tyLfUuDFFuLBjAX11JvWqCMk5JvUAg== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d4cd:b0:20b:c264:fde8 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-20bc59f9fcfmr79593655ad.22.1727927654255; Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:54:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-67-160-120-253.hsd1.wa.comcast.net. [67.160.120.253]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d9443c01a7336-20beead8dc2sm906115ad.44.2024.10.02.20.54.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 02 Oct 2024 20:54:13 -0700 (PDT) From: mhkelley58@gmail.com X-Google-Original-From: mhklinux@outlook.com To: kys@microsoft.com, haiyangz@microsoft.com, wei.liu@kernel.org, decui@microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, joro@8bytes.org, will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/5] Drivers: hv: Don't assume cpu_possible_mask is dense Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 20:53:30 -0700 Message-Id: <20241003035333.49261-3-mhklinux@outlook.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20241003035333.49261-1-mhklinux@outlook.com> References: <20241003035333.49261-1-mhklinux@outlook.com> Reply-To: mhklinux@outlook.com Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Michael Kelley Current code allocates the hv_vp_index array with size num_possible_cpus(). This code assumes cpu_possible_mask is dense, which is not true in the general case per [1]. If cpu_possible_mask is sparse, the array might be indexed by a value beyond the size of the array. However, the configurations that Hyper-V provides to guest VMs on x86 and ARM64 hardware, in combination with how architecture specific code assigns Linux CPU numbers, *does* always produce a dense cpu_possible_mask. So the dense assumption is not currently causing failures. But for robustness against future changes in how cpu_possible_mask is populated, update the code to no longer assume dense. The correct approach is to allocate and initialize the array using size "nr_cpu_ids". While this leaves unused array entries corresponding to holes in cpu_possible_mask, the holes are assumed to be minimal and hence the amount of memory wasted by unused entries is minimal. Using nr_cpu_ids also reduces initialization time, in that the loop to initialize the array currently rescans cpu_possible_mask on each iteration. This is n-squared in the number of CPUs, which could be significant for large CPU counts. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/SN6PR02MB4157210CC36B2593F8572E5ED4692@SN6PR02MB4157.namprd02.prod.outlook.com/ Signed-off-by: Michael Kelley --- drivers/hv/hv_common.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/hv/hv_common.c b/drivers/hv/hv_common.c index d50caf0d723d..8c44938cb084 100644 --- a/drivers/hv/hv_common.c +++ b/drivers/hv/hv_common.c @@ -345,14 +345,14 @@ int __init hv_common_init(void) BUG_ON(!hyperv_pcpu_output_arg); } - hv_vp_index = kmalloc_array(num_possible_cpus(), sizeof(*hv_vp_index), + hv_vp_index = kmalloc_array(nr_cpu_ids, sizeof(*hv_vp_index), GFP_KERNEL); if (!hv_vp_index) { hv_common_free(); return -ENOMEM; } - for (i = 0; i < num_possible_cpus(); i++) + for (i = 0; i < nr_cpu_ids; i++) hv_vp_index[i] = VP_INVAL; return 0;