From patchwork Thu Sep 12 22:39:54 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Bart Van Assche X-Patchwork-Id: 828127 Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net (009.lax.mailroute.net [199.89.1.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ABD119F13D for ; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:40:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726180823; cv=none; b=KMvYS9JLVwT9S6DlHUonfptQjrmydnWoczKVSStUdb7FBGC5IsCOiIGdaBItR/inUiCjq1tY8mn0H5Ev05z+iBPbc4cprUrobzz+LQYRb2lCthg8OnsshwgIf+bMw4HA4JOkEqHSx0G0lM1+NDh9+9swFtJEpqlbkXWgGJCXeB8= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1726180823; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MzTIZgO8Pr01Ze9i2JkO5CNFqOMRNj4unFZQJXRzUDE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=cKMcvkW4x/CpDid0iyimptaHc9Bmzstv15ZXKPqrbRE4IEXZUI5368S3HPpO9/id+OLBVYDw1cYDEVZFz8CfIVwdrfUZt21lcV2rPOmC2xjjB2oxwb1zVHQi5de+8vl45br99w5kcuBsq10HLHik98gpiNEI+scdeL5O4QG+u9Y= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b=oblpu6NR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=199.89.1.12 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=acm.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=acm.org header.i=@acm.org header.b="oblpu6NR" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4X4XT13XGzzlgMVW; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:40:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=acm.org; h= content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :x-mailer:message-id:date:date:subject:subject:from:from :received:received; s=mr01; t=1726180818; x=1728772819; bh=PVwFA aSgprFDzebneQxEdDzHnbI9aOLw0GmSwc9jzo0=; b=oblpu6NRB1LEy7e7l69LA YOGeIk0JjEBmvtDgfAVeVnPoBT8lm059vuevulDE6SL8jMgAdQjeHnxK+DmPB/aO sUH/2HVK/auePC36vu5zh89T1Fx26orb2qR5JUzkDQJwGFFADJeBJH8n9s5GF//6 PPBPQn2V6JGqSSfZKppkQJ+hbyjm/VmmIC4Tqn0bAMkDOhsaKDgB+Imxl4NMBD8K c7x4UyPq7O+tKLECkC5sdun/uKchA67sdnqkop1+0r5HjHr8yokDMsYYs+12u4FM mm85FwiPBzPr3jwDCkr9vNhlw09jQhX4ZEtbkKXqmPlsgdJbQiEyZJYyEFFZFBNv g== X-Virus-Scanned: by MailRoute Received: from 009.lax.mailroute.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (009.lax [127.0.0.1]) (mroute_mailscanner, port 10029) with LMTP id jf7NGG2hHlQY; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bvanassche.mtv.corp.google.com (unknown [104.135.204.82]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bvanassche@acm.org) by 009.lax.mailroute.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4X4XSx4V2GzlgMVh; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:40:17 +0000 (UTC) From: Bart Van Assche To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Andy Shevchenko , Amit Sunil Dhamne , Bart Van Assche Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] locking/mutex: Define mutex_init() once Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 15:39:54 -0700 Message-ID: <20240912223956.3554086-2-bvanassche@acm.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0.662.g92d0881bb0-goog In-Reply-To: <20240912223956.3554086-1-bvanassche@acm.org> References: <20240912223956.3554086-1-bvanassche@acm.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 With CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT disabled __mutex_init() is a function. With CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT enabled, __mutex_init() is a macro. I assume this is why mutex_init() is defined twice as exactly the same macro. Prepare for introducing a new macro for mutex initialization by combining the two identical mutex_init() definitions into a single definition. This patch does not change any functionality because the C preprocessor expands macros when it encounters the macro name and not when a macro definition is encountered. See also commit bb630f9f7a7d ("locking/rtmutex: Add mutex variant for RT"). Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) Cc: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche --- include/linux/mutex.h | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/mutex.h b/include/linux/mutex.h index a561c629d89f..ef617089db19 100644 --- a/include/linux/mutex.h +++ b/include/linux/mutex.h @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static inline void mutex_destroy(struct mutex *lock) {} #endif -#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT /** * mutex_init - initialize the mutex * @mutex: the mutex to be initialized @@ -65,6 +64,7 @@ do { \ __mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \ } while (0) +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT #define __MUTEX_INITIALIZER(lockname) \ { .owner = ATOMIC_LONG_INIT(0) \ , .wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(lockname.wait_lock) \ @@ -111,12 +111,6 @@ do { \ __mutex_rt_init((mutex), name, key); \ } while (0) -#define mutex_init(mutex) \ -do { \ - static struct lock_class_key __key; \ - \ - __mutex_init((mutex), #mutex, &__key); \ -} while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT */ #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES