From patchwork Fri Jun 10 07:26:09 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ping-Ke Shih X-Patchwork-Id: 581147 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD47C43334 for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 07:27:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1346504AbiFJH1a (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 03:27:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56896 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1343879AbiFJH1D (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 03:27:03 -0400 Received: from rtits2.realtek.com.tw (rtits2.realtek.com [211.75.126.72]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C8211455AF for ; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 00:27:00 -0700 (PDT) Authenticated-By: X-SpamFilter-By: ArmorX SpamTrap 5.73 with qID 25A7QufrE010184, This message is accepted by code: ctloc85258 Received: from mail.realtek.com (rtexh36505.realtek.com.tw[172.21.6.25]) by rtits2.realtek.com.tw (8.15.2/2.71/5.88) with ESMTPS id 25A7QufrE010184 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:56 +0800 Received: from RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) by RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.28; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:55 +0800 Received: from localhost (172.21.69.188) by RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:55 +0800 From: Ping-Ke Shih To: CC: , , Subject: [PATCH 10/11] rtw89: pci: fix PCI doesn't reclaim TX BD properly Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 15:26:09 +0800 Message-ID: <20220610072610.27095-11-pkshih@realtek.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20220610072610.27095-1-pkshih@realtek.com> References: <20220610072610.27095-1-pkshih@realtek.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [172.21.69.188] X-ClientProxiedBy: RTEXMBS02.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.95) To RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw (172.21.6.97) X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXMBS04.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: trusted connection X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 06/10/2022 07:06:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: =?big5_tw?b?Q2xlYW4sIGJhc2VzOiAyMDIyLzYvMTAgpFekyCAwNjow?= =?big5_tw?b?MDowMA==?= X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled X-KSE-ServerInfo: RTEXH36505.realtek.com.tw, 9 X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Rules: Clean X-KSE-Attachment-Filter-Triggered-Filters: Clean X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: protection disabled Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org TX BD (TX ring index) and TX WD (WiFi descriptor buffer) are freed asynchronously. With burst packets, we free TX WD, but the corresponding TX BD couldn't be freed yet. Then, TX can possibly get stuck due to no more TX BD. To avoid this, ignore reclaiming TX BD only if TX WD is no free space, because at this moment TX BD must have some spaces. Otherwise, we reclaim TX BD to resolve TX stuck issue. Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c index fd5d9bde01085..73b3b7e9fe6f5 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/pci.c @@ -952,9 +952,10 @@ static u32 __rtw89_pci_check_and_reclaim_tx_resource(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, if (wd_cnt == 0 || bd_cnt == 0) { cnt = rtw89_pci_rxbd_recalc(rtwdev, rx_ring); - if (!cnt) + if (cnt) + rtw89_pci_release_tx(rtwdev, rx_ring, cnt); + else if (wd_cnt == 0) goto out_unlock; - rtw89_pci_release_tx(rtwdev, rx_ring, cnt); bd_cnt = rtw89_pci_get_avail_txbd_num(tx_ring); if (bd_cnt == 0) @@ -965,7 +966,9 @@ static u32 __rtw89_pci_check_and_reclaim_tx_resource(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, wd_cnt = wd_ring->curr_num; min_cnt = min(bd_cnt, wd_cnt); if (min_cnt == 0) - rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "still no tx resource after reclaim\n"); + rtw89_debug(rtwdev, rtwpci->low_power ? RTW89_DBG_TXRX : RTW89_DBG_UNEXP, + "still no tx resource after reclaim: wd_cnt=%d bd_cnt=%d\n", + wd_cnt, bd_cnt); out_unlock: spin_unlock_bh(&rtwpci->trx_lock);