| Message ID | 20241209042020.21290-1-pkshih@realtek.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/2] wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: refine target channel calculation in _rx_dck_channel_calc() | expand |
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote: > The channel is not possibly 0, so original code is fine. Still want to > avoid Coverity warning, so ensure -32 offset for the channel number which > is larger than 125 only. Actually, don't change logic at all. > > Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1628150 ("Overflowed constant") > > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> 2 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks. b6c10a193637 wifi: rtw89: 8852c: rfk: refine target channel calculation in _rx_dck_channel_calc() 5fdf5e557f06 wifi: rtw89: 8851b: rfk: remove unnecessary assignment of return value of _dpk_dgain_read() --- https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c index bd17c0a1c684..b92e2ce4f4ad 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c @@ -1769,10 +1769,10 @@ u8 _rx_dck_channel_calc(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, const struct rtw89_chan *chan) target_ch = chan->channel - 33; } } else if (chan->band_type == RTW89_BAND_6G) { - if (chan->channel >= 1 && chan->channel <= 125) - target_ch = chan->channel + 32; - else + if (chan->channel > 125) target_ch = chan->channel - 32; + else + target_ch = chan->channel + 32; } else { target_ch = chan->channel; }
The channel is not possibly 0, so original code is fine. Still want to avoid Coverity warning, so ensure -32 offset for the channel number which is larger than 125 only. Actually, don't change logic at all. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1628150 ("Overflowed constant") Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> --- drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/rtw8852c_rfk.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)