From patchwork Thu May 29 14:47:56 2025 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Emily X-Patchwork-Id: 893651 Received: from fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-b2-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E42C533E4 for ; Thu, 29 May 2025 14:49:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748530160; cv=none; b=M9VpYzKO6gv6bZDLyVZnY0hXO5OPWYubyrixAnFtXRCZOFD2ICIa6HdqTocjd94mD2jKcDPSR+KbOfqAyzX1rs96BPpYjstHXBRQ356jjqvPLtTaZ9eK62y/67atfy9JM0fwkJc/axp2qHpCjdcWgbgFiDMt03K6zQPL4BlkcDo= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748530160; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Wp4vJGT0gG9WdCWfyMiNV23sf+IfXLWCXkbJEyVndco=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=snWveIKzHNNHmiaK0owXL8xcCAMEaUU6XI8TSOp+11ROJjHiNDk70Wtuw6TVsLLi9dm4PZVl06iLkj3WUng04vdqb7QKz2XddYm0FC0F8DSMVQrhzzZ+VVsYz4o6EpvLgfkBmYY6pwDLzK8OCM+uc2NkoDAk8QdVP5TZOpYU7HU= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=emily.moe; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=emily.moe; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=emily.moe header.i=@emily.moe header.b=LxOVsix1; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=B9sOwg5J; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=emily.moe Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=emily.moe Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=emily.moe header.i=@emily.moe header.b="LxOVsix1"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="B9sOwg5J" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfout.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD7461140122; Thu, 29 May 2025 10:49:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-imap-16 ([10.202.2.88]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 29 May 2025 10:49:16 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=emily.moe; h=cc :cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date :date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1748530156; x=1748616556; bh=+5XrwQcXjTJzUM2MFfvkIx9eS2VzpJsm+RPNfXTZeFM=; b= LxOVsix1UCiEECy1oFMxqGyX3OSUHipGIUqjcO9/MAyT6J574kF/78UhaAbSfM1v WC6Fl9YHPQt6aX/uh3403vR+Sm3Zs2MhQnTBS6X5AENHAFcyq+pN6wTRwBLEVZ2L 6Hz9IK+dY1MAVD1/sBOi9ZMosP6jsZwipbW8n94ys4pBcJUlLKAwtnqNsaaBHT1K JNc5TKSCmmaQ5YBZkQP3HgXFEYwSm8lkTyNttd2bPKZ55viFzWtH5++dZzNFX1Ao 7AKVWJOpLw32DIoWJ8Z0f89TW0rKkjb+rchDKqtWgWmPd+7goDPaEKmWiOLlX5sK EX1SCIzCGxUft7iQXIElMQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t=1748530156; x= 1748616556; bh=+5XrwQcXjTJzUM2MFfvkIx9eS2VzpJsm+RPNfXTZeFM=; b=B 9sOwg5J51+3tVqCol4NpQ+0BgLwr+FWbGqg8Gp0QvvgZkI4TSv5zrRe4UXeQnYVL I8nVLj2fiKV4mjoOjF4laTti72fN6wTqiG1y2/GZFT+EhsrOCxzE5Rg8tQCrPXsH lp4e+vzjbFaf+KTiJZdMAcwpwNgOhCO/j14tci6DYPsZWw8uzX1emNKnNywWHpAc 7vPdJXn3K91c5KoHv4d4h2lsPCDfaWAvl0AzPojKgQtF2u5RkTaLpGy2ARBaPuc8 vH6Im21bzE2EWQvn9ZNesxqC7RIXWjaGLfmLG1qpbE3yUdbMlgQS4zyug06igqP4 qEYA17A/D8qorsb+n3WsA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgddvieegudculddtuddrgeefvddrtd dtmdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpggft fghnshhusghstghrihgsvgdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftd dtnecunecujfgurhepoffhvfevufffkffojghfgggtgfesthekredtredtjeenucfhrhho mhepgfhmihhlhicuoehlihhnuhigsegvmhhilhihrdhmohgvqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrh hnpeejudduledvffeuteekveeffeetfeethfelieehjedviedthedvvdffgeeuieevvden ucffohhmrghinhepohhftghomhdrohhrghdruhhknecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd enucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheplhhinhhugiesvghmihhlhidrmhhovgdpnhgs pghrtghpthhtohepfedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugi esvghmihhlhidrmhhovgdprhgtphhtthhopeifihhrvghlvghsshdqrhgvghgusgeslhhi shhtshdrihhnfhhrrgguvggrugdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehlihhnuhigqdifihhrvg hlvghsshesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i3c8944dd:Fastmail Received: by mailuser.phl.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id 55A3D2CC0081; Thu, 29 May 2025 10:49:16 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface From: Emily To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: wireless-regdb@lists.infradead.org, Emily Subject: [PATCH v2] wireless-regdb: Permit 320 MHz bandwidth in 6 GHz band for GB Date: Thu, 29 May 2025 15:47:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20250529144854.31931-1-linux@emily.moe> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.49.0 In-Reply-To: <20250529135706.31269-1-linux@emily.moe> References: <20250529135706.31269-1-linux@emily.moe> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Emily Similarly to the changes in 6c7cbccaee121772a23fa0efdfefcdd8a2369985 (“wireless-regdb: Permit 320 MHz bandwidth in 6 GHz band in ETSI/CEPT”), the Ofcom regulations for the 5925–6425 MHz band [1] have no explicit limits on bandwidth: > Maximum mean EIRP of 250mW for Low Power indoor and 25mW for Very > Low Power indoor and mobile outdoor. > > Maximum mean EIRP density of 12.6mW/MHz in any 1 MHz band. > > Techniques to access spectrum and mitigate interference that provide > at least equivalent performance to the techniques described in > designated standards specified in the Notices of publication (See > Section 6) for the 5150 – 5250 MHz band must be used. I cannot find any material online suggesting that the use of 320 MHz bandwidth is restricted in any way. [1] https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/spectrum/interface-requirements/ir-2030.pdf?v=335258 Signed-off-by: Emily --- Sorry for the list spam; I didn’t notice the typo in the commit subject line until it was pointed out to me out of band… db.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/db.txt b/db.txt index e331d4f..c2ed384 100644 --- a/db.txt +++ b/db.txt @@ -722,7 +722,7 @@ country GB: DFS-ETSI (5470 - 5730 @ 160), (500 mW), DFS, wmmrule=ETSI # short range devices (ETSI EN 300 440-1) (5725 - 5850 @ 80), (200 mW), NO-OUTDOOR - (5925 - 6425 @ 160), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, wmmrule=ETSI + (5925 - 6425 @ 320), (250 mW), NO-OUTDOOR, wmmrule=ETSI # 60 GHz band channels 1-6 (57000 - 71000 @ 2160), (40)