Message ID | 20181010142055.25271-1-dmurphy@ti.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | M_CAN Framework rework | expand |
Bump On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: > All > > This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register > to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that > is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions. > > This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x > device > Reference upstream post: > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/ > > For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to > determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well > as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must > be set by the device attached to the core. > > The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for > writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this. > > This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts > nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will > finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series. > > Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch > directives but none seemed to reduce the patch. > > Dan > > Dan Murphy (3): > can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code > dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver > can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel > > .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 + > drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 + > drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +- > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +---------------- > .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++-- > drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 + > drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++ > 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt > copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%) > create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h > create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy
Hi Dan, On Thursday 18 October 2018 01:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: > Bump > > On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> All >> >> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register >> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that >> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions. >> >> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x >> device >> Reference upstream post: >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/ >> >> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to >> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well >> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must >> be set by the device attached to the core. >> >> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for >> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this. >> >> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts >> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will >> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series. >> >> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch >> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch. >> >> Dan >> >> Dan Murphy (3): >> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code >> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver >> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +- >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +---------------- >> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++-- >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++ >> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt >> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%) >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c >> Patch 1/3 never arrived for me. Its not there on lkml either. https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/10/611 Can you resend the complete series? Thanks, Faiz
Hallo Dan, I will have a closer look later this week. Unfortunately you already renamed file names and structs making the patch almost unreadable. More soon.. Thanks for you patience, Wolfgang. Am 17.10.2018 um 22:21 schrieb Dan Murphy: > Bump > > On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> All >> >> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register >> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that >> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions. >> >> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x >> device >> Reference upstream post: >> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/ >> >> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to >> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well >> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must >> be set by the device attached to the core. >> >> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for >> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this. >> >> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts >> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will >> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series. >> >> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch >> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch. >> >> Dan >> >> Dan Murphy (3): >> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code >> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver >> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel >> >> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +- >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +---------------- >> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++-- >> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 + >> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++ >> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt >> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%) >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h >> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c >> > >
Wolfgang On 10/24/2018 02:43 AM, Wolfgang Grandegger wrote: > Hallo Dan, > > I will have a closer look later this week. Unfortunately you already > renamed file names and structs making the patch almost unreadable. More > soon.. > I tried to format the patch to eliminate the massive change but format patch kept giving me the same result. It is a massive change regardless not sure how else to make is smaller. I guess this is why I opt'd to just create the dedicated TCAN driver. Dan > Thanks for you patience, > > Wolfgang. > > Am 17.10.2018 um 22:21 schrieb Dan Murphy: >> Bump >> >> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> All >>> >>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register >>> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that >>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions. >>> >>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x >>> device >>> Reference upstream post: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/ >>> >>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to >>> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well >>> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must >>> be set by the device attached to the core. >>> >>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for >>> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this. >>> >>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts >>> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will >>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series. >>> >>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch >>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> Dan Murphy (3): >>> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code >>> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver >>> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +- >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +---------------- >>> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++-- >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++ >>> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt >>> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c >>> >> >> -- ------------------ Dan Murphy
On 10/24/2018 02:33 AM, Faiz Abbas wrote: > Hi Dan, > > On Thursday 18 October 2018 01:51 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >> Bump >> >> On 10/10/2018 09:20 AM, Dan Murphy wrote: >>> All >>> >>> This patch series creates a m_can core framework that devices can register >>> to. The m_can core manages the Bosch IP and CAN frames. Each device that >>> is registered is responsible for managing device specific functions. >>> >>> This rewrite was suggested in a device driver submission for the TCAN4x5x >>> device >>> Reference upstream post: >>> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/984163/ >>> >>> For instance the TCAN device is a SPI device that uses a specific data payload to >>> determine writes and reads. In addition the device has a reset input as well >>> as a wakeup pin. The register offset of the m_can registers differs and must >>> be set by the device attached to the core. >>> >>> The m_can core will use iomapped writes and reads as the default mechanism for >>> writing and reading. The device driver can provide over rides for this. >>> >>> This patch series is not complete as it does not handle the CAN interrupts >>> nor can perform a CAN write. If this patch series is deemed acceptable I will >>> finish debugging the driver and post a non RFC series. >>> >>> Finally I did attempt to reduce the first patch with various git format patch >>> directives but none seemed to reduce the patch. >>> >>> Dan >>> >>> Dan Murphy (3): >>> can: m_can: Create m_can core to leverage common code >>> dt-bindings: can: tcan4x5x: Add DT bindings for TCAN4x5X driver >>> can: tcan4x5x: Add tcan4x5x driver to the kernel >>> >>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt | 34 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Kconfig | 18 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/Makefile | 4 +- >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can.c | 1683 +---------------- >>> .../net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} | 479 +++-- >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h | 100 + >>> drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c | 321 ++++ >>> 7 files changed, 722 insertions(+), 1917 deletions(-) >>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/tcan4x5x.txt >>> copy drivers/net/can/m_can/{m_can.c => m_can_core.c} (83%) >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/m_can_core.h >>> create mode 100644 drivers/net/can/m_can/tcan4x5x.c >>> > > Patch 1/3 never arrived for me. Its not there on lkml either. > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/10/10/611 > LKML seems to have issue with 1/3. Here they were posted. Maybe the patch is to large but I received all 3 + the cover letter. https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998019/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998017/ https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/998020/ > Can you resend the complete series? > > Thanks, > Faiz > -- ------------------ Dan Murphy