From patchwork Mon Sep 12 10:52:39 2016 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Baoyou Xie X-Patchwork-Id: 75985 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.106.72 with SMTP id d66csp786239qgf; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.98.46.199 with SMTP id u190mr31815522pfu.160.1473677577260; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lt14si20786833pab.179.2016.09.12.03.52.56; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:57 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757274AbcILKwy (ORCPT + 27 others); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:52:54 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:35005 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751955AbcILKwx (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 06:52:53 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f173.google.com with SMTP id i75so11252274pfa.2 for ; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=AvH4yIUf8mVaU9UeR30z/RGj8KmM6ZEIy/i+goL/vHY=; b=NvdHhH6oiPR86GuqnHT50ddSHirENou48VIuNVXNY4FapUJPWkxq6/L+J4D8s8y4es srFrpirEzbD0mlVIQeWf8XwK/jX0vNMaGRBsVCm6cp233dEsz5zFKCaZgRryfNszW6mD wOBVOQ/QDQW05zkszVguR0UiiDdw1KB64nOTc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=AvH4yIUf8mVaU9UeR30z/RGj8KmM6ZEIy/i+goL/vHY=; b=EaKfTkSDsUgr1vRL33xEtk+Hf93XKuVtj6eU6TTKWc1QOkhRMRaaxBDlo1KpGn8PtE I6hsc7ywImeUIREEObSfFd9qdTJUU0VIHtaEDT6xTg8hAdiGBJHnnLBEUvgkKa6PLc7k HYec5vZ4HF3uXDG7cSkL2jZP2D1ulQ4obO1AeJblydgk2HK4jxLm9bm6bcGOBCYxIlxB to56UF96u6bkzu1+tAdQrtbSfZu6cwMOk3Ib7CShnEYieq1BBYYbsx87mrsjZXNCTEdj OE9iX155ezX5j0ea4HsnHqK24M09piVLH3TdVJfQkEvn5SXXQOlqCy4CFGGAFzDKyHrA WT6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNrknhgyu4bCgWncqEJPmjsQKwFGpdXcHfnh/ueOwNdjVCDVq+1SOnzefoWaz44842y X-Received: by 10.98.109.66 with SMTP id i63mr32637218pfc.126.1473677572916; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([45.56.152.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ae7sm4491538pac.19.2016.09.12.03.52.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 12 Sep 2016 03:52:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Baoyou Xie To: will.deacon@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, olof@lixom.net, mark.rutland@arm.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de, a.hajda@samsung.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, baoyou.xie@linaro.org, xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn Subject: [PATCH v2] arm-cci: add cci_enable_port_for_self() declaration in arm-cci.h Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 18:52:39 +0800 Message-Id: <1473677559-15123-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: drivers/bus/arm-cci.c:2027:25: warning: no previous prototype for 'cci_enable_port_for_self' [-Wmissing-prototypes] In fact, this function is used in a few files, but should be declared in a header file. So this patch adds the declaration in arm-cci.h. Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie --- include/linux/arm-cci.h | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) -- 2.7.4 diff --git a/include/linux/arm-cci.h b/include/linux/arm-cci.h index 521ec1f..626083b 100644 --- a/include/linux/arm-cci.h +++ b/include/linux/arm-cci.h @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ extern int cci_ace_get_port(struct device_node *dn); extern int cci_disable_port_by_cpu(u64 mpidr); extern int __cci_control_port_by_device(struct device_node *dn, bool enable); extern int __cci_control_port_by_index(u32 port, bool enable); +extern asmlinkage void __naked cci_enable_port_for_self(void); #else static inline int cci_ace_get_port(struct device_node *dn) { @@ -54,6 +55,9 @@ static inline int __cci_control_port_by_index(u32 port, bool enable) { return -ENODEV; } +static inline void ci_enable_port_for_self(void) +{ +} #endif #define cci_disable_port_by_device(dev) \