From patchwork Thu Jan 5 06:04:31 2017 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Viresh Kumar X-Patchwork-Id: 89951 Delivered-To: patch@linaro.org Received: by 10.140.20.101 with SMTP id 92csp8822974qgi; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:06:31 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.99.105.70 with SMTP id e67mr127787720pgc.99.1483596391339; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:06:31 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f86si74741929pfd.106.2017.01.04.22.06.31; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937918AbdAEGGK (ORCPT + 25 others); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 01:06:10 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f50.google.com ([74.125.83.50]:34563 "EHLO mail-pg0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1032409AbdAEGE5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 01:04:57 -0500 Received: by mail-pg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id y62so184195922pgy.1 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:04:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :in-reply-to:references; bh=JD2rHJrIFLmRpHVNnn/Z8U+SjKwNkAJEv8+wpmRTBVw=; b=HT2IVNAS7Kq9Pm8sR4szq5uqEHB+rdVvJ/oxvTSSCbYE0e1xRZKwq4yATQAX1nhAS0 kV32/BsHFxDjtzXidhsZ1pOyC/vsjT7h254A80MBJY8nVcIW/rTrGiYfU4gbJ7mfuMUn aQCeHTvQb8ZdtNMuGm/bAEcXhZTYJL4wK98HA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:in-reply-to:references; bh=JD2rHJrIFLmRpHVNnn/Z8U+SjKwNkAJEv8+wpmRTBVw=; b=ptsjpfu4Tg9J3B+3pdumCjMrWyv9zmJCssEN7XzZBCVDCkhJbS2SSa1S9jBYzy+lHo N2d7u92ILuhgY5fl8wHvYevsjzWkwjpeuShHlIzEsyC8iMzMYi1emoN+IRKbC1DBoKuo Cs5RUCXGMBV/jmXaAQ8HyJnrKd3u/PNYKACSDP+ONRwVB6VafIWpcSzEmELURqBHtajb PSORoWJBcE6vE0KMJDFCn0Tgkp5PCPKHOcn0vwgg6Z0now3FjL2iR1gC7UR79CCMyaYM B1wFqDwV6QsYuRKTwbbuOFQsnLIuVU+SwneKLb5ZWf64kURZgE1//UMvrnaSpl9bgtej I+pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJsjpLvef0nu2/i8jsfwuHcXXhb/bNYZX7Sp3EUXWF7IGDA/OchWFpWLCpVavd9XtLh X-Received: by 10.99.226.3 with SMTP id q3mr131852778pgh.37.1483596296950; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([122.171.77.55]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g82sm150646302pfb.43.2017.01.04.22.04.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:04:56 -0800 (PST) From: Viresh Kumar To: Rafael Wysocki , Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vincent Guittot Subject: [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Remove CPUFREQ_START notifier event Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:34:31 +0530 Message-Id: <2188a4e88d725062c400bcb50cc41477346e36c1.1483596168.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b In-Reply-To: References: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Its not used anymore, remove it. Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 3 --- drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c | 3 --- include/linux/cpufreq.h | 1 - 3 files changed, 7 deletions(-) -- 2.7.1.410.g6faf27b diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c index 53268bebdf1e..408479540566 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c @@ -1246,9 +1246,6 @@ static int cpufreq_online(unsigned int cpu) write_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags); } - blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list, - CPUFREQ_START, policy); - ret = cpufreq_init_policy(policy); if (ret) { pr_err("%s: Failed to initialize policy for cpu: %d (%d)\n", diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c index dc112481a408..eeaa92251512 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/ppc_cbe_cpufreq_pmi.c @@ -100,9 +100,6 @@ static int pmi_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, /* Should this really be called for CPUFREQ_ADJUST and CPUFREQ_NOTIFY * policy events?) */ - if (event == CPUFREQ_START) - return 0; - node = cbe_cpu_to_node(policy->cpu); pr_debug("got notified, event=%lu, node=%u\n", event, node); diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h index 0183986b3ba6..61009c0b82c8 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h @@ -415,7 +415,6 @@ static inline void cpufreq_resume(void) {} /* Policy Notifiers */ #define CPUFREQ_ADJUST (0) #define CPUFREQ_NOTIFY (1) -#define CPUFREQ_START (2) #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ int cpufreq_register_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned int list);