Message ID | 1616684215-4701-1-git-send-email-moshe@nvidia.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ethtool: Extend module EEPROM dump API | expand |
> From: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> > > In case netlink get_module_eeprom_by_page() callback is not implemented > by the driver, try to call old get_module_info() and get_module_eeprom() > pair. Recalculate parameters to get_module_eeprom() offset and len using > page number and their sizes. Return error if this can't be done. > > Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> > --- > net/ethtool/eeprom.c | 66 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c index > 10d5f6b34f2f..9f773b778bbe 100644 > --- a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c > +++ b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c > @@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct eeprom_reply_data { #define > MODULE_EEPROM_REPDATA(__reply_base) \ > container_of(__reply_base, struct eeprom_reply_data, base) > > +static int fallback_set_params(struct eeprom_req_info *request, > + struct ethtool_modinfo *modinfo, > + struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom) { > + u32 offset = request->offset; > + u32 length = request->length; > + > + if (request->page) > + offset = request->page * > ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN + offset; The test 'if (request->page)' is not necessary, the math works with page 0 as well. Keep it if you like the style. > + > + if (modinfo->type == ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079 && > + request->i2c_address == 0x51) > + offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN; offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN * 2; Now that PAGE_LEN is 128, you need two of them to account for both low memory and high memory at 0x50. > + > + if (offset >= modinfo->eeprom_len) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + eeprom->cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEEEPROM; > + eeprom->len = length; > + eeprom->offset = offset; > + > + return 0; > +} > + > +static int eeprom_fallback(struct eeprom_req_info *request, > + struct eeprom_reply_data *reply, > + struct genl_info *info) > +{ > + struct net_device *dev = reply->base.dev; > + struct ethtool_modinfo modinfo = {0}; > + struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom = {0}; > + u8 *data; > + int err; > + > + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info || > + !dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom || request->bank) { > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + } > + modinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEINFO; > + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info(dev, &modinfo); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + err = fallback_set_params(request, &modinfo, &eeprom); > + if (err < 0) > + return err; > + > + data = kmalloc(eeprom.len, GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!data) > + return -ENOMEM; > + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom(dev, &eeprom, > data); > + if (err < 0) > + goto err_out; > + > + reply->data = data; > + reply->length = eeprom.len; > + > + return 0; > + > +err_out: > + kfree(data); > + return err; > +} > + > static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base, > struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base, > struct genl_info *info) > @@ -36,7 +100,7 @@ static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct > ethnl_req_info *req_base, > int ret; > > if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom_by_page) > - return -EOPNOTSUPP; > + return eeprom_fallback(request, reply, info); > > page_data.offset = request->offset; > page_data.length = request->length; > -- > 2.18.2
On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:56:50PM +0200, Moshe Shemesh wrote: > Ethtool supports module EEPROM dumps via the `ethtool -m <dev>` command. > But in current state its functionality is limited - offset and length > parameters, which are used to specify a linear desired region of EEPROM > data to dump, is not enough, considering emergence of complex module > EEPROM layouts such as CMIS 4.0. > Moreover, CMIS 4.0 extends the amount of pages that may be accessible by > introducing another parameter for page addressing - banks. This is looking much better. Do you have a version of ethtool using this new API? WIP code is O.K. I will add basic support to sfp.c and test it out on the devices i have. Andrew
On 3/25/2021 8:13 PM, Don Bollinger wrote: >> From: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> >> >> In case netlink get_module_eeprom_by_page() callback is not implemented >> by the driver, try to call old get_module_info() and get_module_eeprom() >> pair. Recalculate parameters to get_module_eeprom() offset and len using >> page number and their sizes. Return error if this can't be done. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vladyslav Tarasiuk <vladyslavt@nvidia.com> >> --- >> net/ethtool/eeprom.c | 66 >> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c index >> 10d5f6b34f2f..9f773b778bbe 100644 >> --- a/net/ethtool/eeprom.c >> +++ b/net/ethtool/eeprom.c >> @@ -25,6 +25,70 @@ struct eeprom_reply_data { #define >> MODULE_EEPROM_REPDATA(__reply_base) \ >> container_of(__reply_base, struct eeprom_reply_data, base) >> >> +static int fallback_set_params(struct eeprom_req_info *request, >> + struct ethtool_modinfo *modinfo, >> + struct ethtool_eeprom *eeprom) { >> + u32 offset = request->offset; >> + u32 length = request->length; >> + >> + if (request->page) >> + offset = request->page * >> ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN + offset; > The test 'if (request->page)' is not necessary, the math works with page 0 > as well. Keep it if you like the style. OK. >> + >> + if (modinfo->type == ETH_MODULE_SFF_8079 && >> + request->i2c_address == 0x51) >> + offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN; > offset += ETH_MODULE_EEPROM_PAGE_LEN * 2; > > Now that PAGE_LEN is 128, you need two of them to account for both low > memory and high memory at 0x50. Right, thanks. >> + >> + if (offset >= modinfo->eeprom_len) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + eeprom->cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEEEPROM; >> + eeprom->len = length; >> + eeprom->offset = offset; >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int eeprom_fallback(struct eeprom_req_info *request, >> + struct eeprom_reply_data *reply, >> + struct genl_info *info) >> +{ >> + struct net_device *dev = reply->base.dev; >> + struct ethtool_modinfo modinfo = {0}; >> + struct ethtool_eeprom eeprom = {0}; >> + u8 *data; >> + int err; >> + >> + if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info || >> + !dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom || request->bank) { >> + return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> + } >> + modinfo.cmd = ETHTOOL_GMODULEINFO; >> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_info(dev, &modinfo); >> + if (err < 0) >> + return err; >> + >> + err = fallback_set_params(request, &modinfo, &eeprom); >> + if (err < 0) >> + return err; >> + >> + data = kmalloc(eeprom.len, GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!data) >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + err = dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom(dev, &eeprom, >> data); >> + if (err < 0) >> + goto err_out; >> + >> + reply->data = data; >> + reply->length = eeprom.len; >> + >> + return 0; >> + >> +err_out: >> + kfree(data); >> + return err; >> +} >> + >> static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct ethnl_req_info *req_base, >> struct ethnl_reply_data *reply_base, >> struct genl_info *info) >> @@ -36,7 +100,7 @@ static int eeprom_prepare_data(const struct >> ethnl_req_info *req_base, >> int ret; >> >> if (!dev->ethtool_ops->get_module_eeprom_by_page) >> - return -EOPNOTSUPP; >> + return eeprom_fallback(request, reply, info); >> >> page_data.offset = request->offset; >> page_data.length = request->length; >> -- >> 2.18.2
On 3/26/2021 1:41 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote: > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments > > > On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 04:56:50PM +0200, Moshe Shemesh wrote: >> Ethtool supports module EEPROM dumps via the `ethtool -m <dev>` command. >> But in current state its functionality is limited - offset and length >> parameters, which are used to specify a linear desired region of EEPROM >> data to dump, is not enough, considering emergence of complex module >> EEPROM layouts such as CMIS 4.0. >> Moreover, CMIS 4.0 extends the amount of pages that may be accessible by >> introducing another parameter for page addressing - banks. > This is looking much better. > > Do you have a version of ethtool using this new API? WIP code is > O.K. I will add basic support to sfp.c and test it out on the devices > i have. Sure. > Andrew