mbox series

[net-next,0/2] net/smc: updates 2020-10-02

Message ID 20201002150927.72261-1-kgraul@linux.ibm.com
Headers show
Series net/smc: updates 2020-10-02 | expand

Message

Karsten Graul Oct. 2, 2020, 3:09 p.m. UTC 
Please apply the following patch series for smc to netdev's net-next tree.

Patch 1 improves the ISM device payload of a CLC porposal message, patch 2
adds to use an array to access the system EID fields.

Karsten Graul (2):
  net/smc: send ISM devices with unique chid in CLC proposal
  net/smc: use an array to check fields in system EID

 net/smc/af_smc.c  | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
 net/smc/smc_ism.c |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

David Miller Oct. 4, 2020, 12:05 a.m. UTC | #1 
From: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Fri,  2 Oct 2020 17:09:26 +0200

> When building a CLC proposal message then the list of ISM devices does
> not need to contain multiple devices that have the same chid value,
> all these devices use the same function at the end.
> Improve smc_find_ism_v2_device_clnt() to collect only ISM devices that
> have unique chid values.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>

Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future
with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting?  It must explain what the
patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is
doing it that way.

Thank you.
Karsten Graul Oct. 4, 2020, 1:14 p.m. UTC | #2 
On Sat, 03 Oct 2020 17:05:38 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:

> Series applied, but could you send a proper patch series in the future
> with a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." header posting?  It must explain what the
> patch series does at a high level, how it is doing it, and why it is
> doing it that way.
> 
> Thank you.

Hi Dave, not sure what went wrong but I sent the header posting along with
the patches, see https://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2020/10/02/197