Message ID | 20201023064347.206431-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | IPv6: reply ICMP error if fragment doesn't contain all headers | expand |
On 26.10.2020 08:29, Hangbin Liu wrote: > Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header: > > - If the first fragment does not include all headers through an > Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be discarded and > an ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 3, message should be sent to > the source of the fragment, with the Pointer field set to zero. > > As the packet may be any kind of L4 protocol, I only checked some common > protocols' header length and handle others by (offset + 1) > skb->len. > Checking each packet header in IPv6 fast path will have performance impact, > so I put the checking in ipv6_frag_rcv(). > > When send ICMP error message, if the 1st truncated fragment is ICMP message, > icmp6_send() will break as is_ineligible() return true. So I added a check > in is_ineligible() to let fragment packet with nexthdr ICMP but no ICMP header > return false. > > Signed-off-by: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com> > --- > v4: > remove unused variable > > v3: > a) use frag_off to check if this is a fragment packet > b) check some common protocols' header length > > v2: > a) Move header check to ipv6_frag_rcv(). Also check the ipv6_skip_exthdr() > return value > b) Fix ipv6_find_hdr() parameter type miss match in is_ineligible() > > --- > net/ipv6/icmp.c | 8 +++++++- > net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c > index ec448b71bf9a..8956144ea65e 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c > @@ -158,7 +158,13 @@ static bool is_ineligible(const struct sk_buff *skb) > tp = skb_header_pointer(skb, > ptr+offsetof(struct icmp6hdr, icmp6_type), > sizeof(_type), &_type); > - if (!tp || !(*tp & ICMPV6_INFOMSG_MASK)) > + > + /* Based on RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header, return > + * false if this is a fragment packet with no icmp header info. > + */ > + if (!tp && frag_off != 0) > + return false; > + else if (!tp || !(*tp & ICMPV6_INFOMSG_MASK)) > return true; > } > return false; > diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c > index 1f5d4d196dcc..bf042bcb5a47 100644 > --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c > +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c > @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ > #include <linux/skbuff.h> > #include <linux/slab.h> > #include <linux/export.h> > +#include <linux/tcp.h> > +#include <linux/udp.h> > > #include <net/sock.h> > #include <net/snmp.h> > @@ -322,7 +324,9 @@ static int ipv6_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) > struct frag_queue *fq; > const struct ipv6hdr *hdr = ipv6_hdr(skb); > struct net *net = dev_net(skb_dst(skb)->dev); > - int iif; > + __be16 frag_off; > + int iif, offset; > + u8 nexthdr; > > if (IP6CB(skb)->flags & IP6SKB_FRAGMENTED) > goto fail_hdr; > @@ -351,6 +355,33 @@ static int ipv6_frag_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) > return 1; > } > > + /* RFC 8200, Section 4.5 Fragment Header: > + * If the first fragment does not include all headers through an > + * Upper-Layer header, then that fragment should be discarded and > + * an ICMP Parameter Problem, Code 3, message should be sent to > + * the source of the fragment, with the Pointer field set to zero. > + */ > + nexthdr = hdr->nexthdr; > + offset = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb), &nexthdr, &frag_off); > + if (offset < 0) > + goto fail_hdr; > + > + /* Check some common protocols' header */ > + if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP) > + offset += sizeof(struct tcphdr); > + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) > + offset += sizeof(struct udphdr); > + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) > + offset += sizeof(struct icmp6hdr); > + else > + offset += 1; Maybe also check the special case IPPROTO_NONE? > + > + if (frag_off == htons(IP6_MF) && offset > skb->len) { > + __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS); > + icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_INCOMP, 0); > + return -1; > + } > + > iif = skb->dev ? skb->dev->ifindex : 0; > fq = fq_find(net, fhdr->identification, hdr, iif); > if (fq) { Are you planning to also add this fix for the fragmentation handling in the netfilter?
On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:09:21AM +0000, Georg Kohmann (geokohma) wrote: > > + nexthdr = hdr->nexthdr; > > + offset = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb), &nexthdr, &frag_off); > > + if (offset < 0) > > + goto fail_hdr; > > + > > + /* Check some common protocols' header */ > > + if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP) > > + offset += sizeof(struct tcphdr); > > + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) > > + offset += sizeof(struct udphdr); > > + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) > > + offset += sizeof(struct icmp6hdr); > > + else > > + offset += 1; > > Maybe also check the special case IPPROTO_NONE? IPPROTO_NONE defines the same with NEXTHDR_NONE. So ipv6_skip_exthdr() will return -1, and we will goto fail_hdr and send ICMP parameter error message. The question is if it's OK to reply a ICMP error for fragment + IPPROTO_NONE packet? For pure IPPROTO_NONE message, we should drop silently, but what about fragment message? > > + > > + if (frag_off == htons(IP6_MF) && offset > skb->len) { > > + __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS); > > + icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_INCOMP, 0); > > + return -1; > > + } > > + > > iif = skb->dev ? skb->dev->ifindex : 0; > > fq = fq_find(net, fhdr->identification, hdr, iif); > > if (fq) { > > Are you planning to also add this fix for the fragmentation handling in the netfilter? > I have no plan to fix this on netfilter as netfilter is a module. It may have different behavior during defragment. Thanks Hangbin
On 26.10.2020 13:55, Hangbin Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 08:09:21AM +0000, Georg Kohmann (geokohma) wrote: >>> + nexthdr = hdr->nexthdr; >>> + offset = ipv6_skip_exthdr(skb, skb_transport_offset(skb), &nexthdr, &frag_off); >>> + if (offset < 0) >>> + goto fail_hdr; >>> + >>> + /* Check some common protocols' header */ >>> + if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_TCP) >>> + offset += sizeof(struct tcphdr); >>> + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_UDP) >>> + offset += sizeof(struct udphdr); >>> + else if (nexthdr == IPPROTO_ICMPV6) >>> + offset += sizeof(struct icmp6hdr); >>> + else >>> + offset += 1; >> Maybe also check the special case IPPROTO_NONE? > IPPROTO_NONE defines the same with NEXTHDR_NONE. So ipv6_skip_exthdr() will > return -1, and we will goto fail_hdr and send ICMP parameter error message. > > The question is if it's OK to reply a ICMP error for fragment + IPPROTO_NONE > packet? For pure IPPROTO_NONE message, we should drop silently, but what about > fragment message? According to RFC8200 section 4.7: "If the Payload Length field of the IPv6 header indicates the presence of octets past the end of a header whose Next Header field contains 59, those octets must be ignored and passed on unchanged if the packet is forwarded." I have not found any RFC describing different behaviour for fragmented packets. > >>> + >>> + if (frag_off == htons(IP6_MF) && offset > skb->len) { >>> + __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get_safely(skb->dev), IPSTATS_MIB_INHDRERRORS); >>> + icmpv6_param_prob(skb, ICMPV6_HDR_INCOMP, 0); >>> + return -1; >>> + } >>> + >>> iif = skb->dev ? skb->dev->ifindex : 0; >>> fq = fq_find(net, fhdr->identification, hdr, iif); >>> if (fq) { >> Are you planning to also add this fix for the fragmentation handling in the netfilter? >> > I have no plan to fix this on netfilter as netfilter is a module. > It may have different behavior during defragment. > > Thanks > Hangbin I might have a look at the netfilter myself then. Thanks Georg