From patchwork Wed May 19 05:30:48 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Hui Tang X-Patchwork-Id: 443957 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828C3C433ED for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 05:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661ED611BF for ; Wed, 19 May 2021 05:37:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1344802AbhESFi0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 01:38:26 -0400 Received: from szxga06-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.32]:3032 "EHLO szxga06-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243243AbhESFgD (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 May 2021 01:36:03 -0400 Received: from dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.59]) by szxga06-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FlM2H0JzDzmX9s; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:32:23 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemi760-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.146) by dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:34:38 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.165.24) by dggemi760-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.146) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Wed, 19 May 2021 13:34:38 +0800 From: Hui Tang To: , CC: , , Hui Tang , Andrew Lunn Subject: [PATCH 15/20] net: smsc: remove leading spaces before tabs Date: Wed, 19 May 2021 13:30:48 +0800 Message-ID: <1621402253-27200-16-git-send-email-tanghui20@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1621402253-27200-1-git-send-email-tanghui20@huawei.com> References: <1621402253-27200-1-git-send-email-tanghui20@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.165.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems701-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.178) To dggemi760-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.146) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org There are a few leading spaces before tabs and remove it by running the following commard: $ find . -name '*.c' | xargs sed -r -i 's/^[ ]+\t/\t/' $ find . -name '*.h' | xargs sed -r -i 's/^[ ]+\t/\t/' Cc: Andrew Lunn Signed-off-by: Hui Tang --- drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++------------------- drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c | 14 ++++++------- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c index 4b2330d..bf7c8c8 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc9194.c @@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ struct smc_local { struct sk_buff * saved_skb; /* - . This keeps track of how many packets that I have - . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know + . This keeps track of how many packets that I have + . sent out. When an TX_EMPTY interrupt comes, I know . that all of these have been sent. */ int packets_waiting; @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void smc_reset( int ioaddr ) /* Note: It doesn't seem that waiting for the MMU busy is needed here, but this is a place where future chipsets _COULD_ break. Be wary - of issuing another MMU command right after this */ + of issuing another MMU command right after this */ outb( 0, ioaddr + INT_MASK ); } @@ -521,9 +521,9 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, SMC_SELECT_BANK( 2 ); outw( MC_ALLOC | numPages, ioaddr + MMU_CMD ); /* - . Performance Hack + . Performance Hack . - . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send + . wait a short amount of time.. if I can send a packet now, I send . it now. Otherwise, I enable an interrupt and wait for one to be . available. . @@ -540,17 +540,17 @@ static netdev_tx_t smc_wait_to_send_packet(struct sk_buff *skb, if ( status & IM_ALLOC_INT ) { /* acknowledge the interrupt */ outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INTERRUPT ); - break; + break; } - } while ( -- time_out ); + } while ( -- time_out ); - if ( !time_out ) { + if ( !time_out ) { /* oh well, wait until the chip finds memory later */ SMC_ENABLE_INT( IM_ALLOC_INT ); PRINTK2((CARDNAME": memory allocation deferred.\n")); /* it's deferred, but I'll handle it later */ return NETDEV_TX_OK; - } + } /* or YES! I can send the packet now.. */ smc_hardware_send_packet(dev); netif_wake_queue(dev); @@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev ) #endif /* send the packet length ( +6 for status, length and ctl byte ) - and the status word ( set to zeros ) */ + and the status word ( set to zeros ) */ #ifdef USE_32_BIT outl( (length +6 ) << 16 , ioaddr + DATA_1 ); #else @@ -629,8 +629,8 @@ static void smc_hardware_send_packet( struct net_device * dev ) /* send the actual data . I _think_ it's faster to send the longs first, and then . mop up by sending the last word. It depends heavily - . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be - . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take + . on alignment, at least on the 486. Maybe it would be + . a good idea to check which is optimal? But that could take . almost as much time as is saved? */ #ifdef USE_32_BIT @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ static int __init smc_findirq(int ioaddr) outb( IM_ALLOC_INT, ioaddr + INT_MASK ); /* - . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just + . Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just . reset so all the memory is available */ outw( MC_ALLOC | 1, ioaddr + MMU_CMD ); @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) goto err_out; } /* The above MIGHT indicate a device, but I need to write to further - test this. */ + test this. */ outw( 0x0, ioaddr + BANK_SELECT ); bank = inw( ioaddr + BANK_SELECT ); if ( (bank & 0xFF00 ) != 0x3300 ) { @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) goto err_out; } /* well, we've already written once, so hopefully another time won't - hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1, + hurt. This time, I need to switch the bank register to bank 1, so I can access the base address register */ SMC_SELECT_BANK(1); base_address_register = inw( ioaddr + BASE ); @@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) dev->base_addr = ioaddr; /* - . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 ) + . Get the MAC address ( bank 1, regs 4 - 9 ) */ SMC_SELECT_BANK( 1 ); for ( i = 0; i < 6; i += 2 ) { @@ -938,8 +938,8 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) /* Now, I want to find out more about the chip. This is sort of - redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having - one VERY long probe procedure. + redundant, but it's cleaner to have it in both, rather than having + one VERY long probe procedure. */ SMC_SELECT_BANK(3); revision_register = inw( ioaddr + REVISION ); @@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) /* . If dev->irq is 0, then the device has to be banged on to see . what the IRQ is. - . + . . This banging doesn't always detect the IRQ, for unknown reasons. . a workaround is to reset the chip and try again. . @@ -978,7 +978,7 @@ static int __init smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, int ioaddr) . . Specifying an IRQ is done with the assumption that the user knows . what (s)he is doing. No checking is done!!!! - . + . */ if ( dev->irq < 2 ) { int trials; @@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ static int smc_open(struct net_device *dev) } /* - According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address + According to Becker, I have to set the hardware address at this point, because the (l)user can set it with an ioctl. Easily done... */ diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c index cbde83f..813ea94 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/smsc/smc91x.c @@ -671,19 +671,19 @@ smc_hard_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) status = SMC_GET_INT(lp); if (status & IM_ALLOC_INT) { SMC_ACK_INT(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT); - break; + break; } - } while (--poll_count); + } while (--poll_count); smc_special_unlock(&lp->lock, flags); lp->pending_tx_skb = skb; - if (!poll_count) { + if (!poll_count) { /* oh well, wait until the chip finds memory later */ netif_stop_queue(dev); DBG(2, dev, "TX memory allocation deferred.\n"); SMC_ENABLE_INT(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT); - } else { + } else { /* * Allocation succeeded: push packet to the chip's own memory * immediately. @@ -1790,7 +1790,7 @@ static int smc_findirq(struct smc_local *lp) SMC_SET_INT_MASK(lp, IM_ALLOC_INT); /* - * Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just + * Allocate 512 bytes of memory. Note that the chip was just * reset so all the memory is available */ SMC_SET_MMU_CMD(lp, MC_ALLOC | 1); @@ -1998,8 +1998,8 @@ static int smc_probe(struct net_device *dev, void __iomem *ioaddr, /* Grab the IRQ */ retval = request_irq(dev->irq, smc_interrupt, irq_flags, dev->name, dev); - if (retval) - goto err_out; + if (retval) + goto err_out; #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_PXA # ifdef SMC_USE_PXA_DMA