From patchwork Sat Jun 19 09:56:29 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "huangguangbin \(A\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 464238 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDD3C48BE5 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32BC61168 for ; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 09:59:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233158AbhFSKCD (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2021 06:02:03 -0400 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.187]:5051 "EHLO szxga01-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231810AbhFSKB5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 19 Jun 2021 06:01:57 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4G6WNb6bYlzXh8G; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:54:39 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:59:45 +0800 Received: from localhost.localdomain (10.67.165.24) by dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:59:44 +0800 From: Guangbin Huang To: , , , CC: , , , , Subject: [PATCH net-next 8/8] net: at91_can: fix the comments style issue Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2021 17:56:29 +0800 Message-ID: <1624096589-13452-9-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.8.1 In-Reply-To: <1624096589-13452-1-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> References: <1624096589-13452-1-git-send-email-huangguangbin2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.67.165.24] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggemi759-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.145) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Peng Li Networking block comments don't use an empty /* line, use /* Comment... Block comments use * on subsequent lines. Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line. This patch fixes the comments style issues. Signed-off-by: Peng Li Signed-off-by: Guangbin Huang --- drivers/net/can/at91_can.c | 42 ++++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c index 0e6ed59a763d..566891312eda 100644 --- a/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c +++ b/drivers/net/can/at91_can.c @@ -317,8 +317,7 @@ static void at91_setup_mailboxes(struct net_device *dev) unsigned int i; u32 reg_mid; - /* - * Due to a chip bug (errata 50.2.6.3 & 50.3.5.3) the first + /* Due to a chip bug (errata 50.2.6.3 & 50.3.5.3) the first * mailbox is disabled. The next 11 mailboxes are used as a * reception FIFO. The last mailbox is configured with * overwrite option. The overwrite flag indicates a FIFO @@ -424,8 +423,7 @@ static void at91_chip_stop(struct net_device *dev, enum can_state state) priv->can.state = state; } -/* - * theory of operation: +/* theory of operation: * * According to the datasheet priority 0 is the highest priority, 15 * is the lowest. If two mailboxes have the same priority level the @@ -487,8 +485,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t at91_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev) /* _NOTE_: subtract AT91_MB_TX_FIRST offset from mb! */ can_put_echo_skb(skb, dev, mb - get_mb_tx_first(priv), 0); - /* - * we have to stop the queue and deliver all messages in case + /* we have to stop the queue and deliver all messages in case * of a prio+mb counter wrap around. This is the case if * tx_next buffer prio and mailbox equals 0. * @@ -799,8 +796,7 @@ static int at91_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota) if (reg_sr & get_irq_mb_rx(priv)) work_done += at91_poll_rx(dev, quota - work_done); - /* - * The error bits are clear on read, + /* The error bits are clear on read, * so use saved value from irq handler. */ reg_sr |= priv->reg_sr; @@ -820,8 +816,7 @@ static int at91_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota) return work_done; } -/* - * theory of operation: +/* theory of operation: * * priv->tx_echo holds the number of the oldest can_frame put for * transmission into the hardware, but not yet ACKed by the CAN tx @@ -850,8 +845,7 @@ static void at91_irq_tx(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_sr) /* Disable irq for this TX mailbox */ at91_write(priv, AT91_IDR, 1 << mb); - /* - * only echo if mailbox signals us a transfer + /* only echo if mailbox signals us a transfer * complete (MSR_MRDY). Otherwise it's a tansfer * abort. "can_bus_off()" takes care about the skbs * parked in the echo queue. @@ -866,8 +860,7 @@ static void at91_irq_tx(struct net_device *dev, u32 reg_sr) } } - /* - * restart queue if we don't have a wrap around but restart if + /* restart queue if we don't have a wrap around but restart if * we get a TX int for the last can frame directly before a * wrap around. */ @@ -887,8 +880,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, switch (priv->can.state) { case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE: - /* - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE + /* from: ERROR_ACTIVE * to : ERROR_WARNING, ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF * => : there was a warning int */ @@ -904,8 +896,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, } fallthrough; case CAN_STATE_ERROR_WARNING: - /* - * from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING + /* from: ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING * to : ERROR_PASSIVE, BUS_OFF * => : error passive int */ @@ -921,8 +912,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, } break; case CAN_STATE_BUS_OFF: - /* - * from: BUS_OFF + /* from: BUS_OFF * to : ERROR_ACTIVE, ERROR_WARNING, ERROR_PASSIVE */ if (new_state <= CAN_STATE_ERROR_PASSIVE) { @@ -942,8 +932,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err_state(struct net_device *dev, /* process state changes depending on the new state */ switch (new_state) { case CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE: - /* - * actually we want to enable AT91_IRQ_WARN here, but + /* actually we want to enable AT91_IRQ_WARN here, but * it screws up the system under certain * circumstances. so just enable AT91_IRQ_ERRP, thus * the "fallthrough" @@ -1055,8 +1044,7 @@ static void at91_irq_err(struct net_device *dev) priv->can.state = new_state; } -/* - * interrupt handler +/* interrupt handler */ static irqreturn_t at91_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) { @@ -1077,8 +1065,7 @@ static irqreturn_t at91_irq(int irq, void *dev_id) /* Receive or error interrupt? -> napi */ if (reg_sr & (get_irq_mb_rx(priv) | AT91_IRQ_ERR_FRAME)) { - /* - * The error bits are clear on read, + /* The error bits are clear on read, * save for later use. */ priv->reg_sr = reg_sr; @@ -1135,8 +1122,7 @@ static int at91_open(struct net_device *dev) return err; } -/* - * stop CAN bus activity +/* stop CAN bus activity */ static int at91_close(struct net_device *dev) {