From patchwork Sun Feb 7 15:15:05 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Arseny Krasnov X-Patchwork-Id: 379073 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-19.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 949C3C433E0 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5897664DE3 for ; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 15:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229835AbhBGPQ0 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:16:26 -0500 Received: from mx12.kaspersky-labs.com ([91.103.66.155]:12487 "EHLO mx12.kaspersky-labs.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229766AbhBGPQL (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2021 10:16:11 -0500 Received: from relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (unknown [127.0.0.10]) by relay12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A255A75FDC; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:15:15 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kaspersky.com; s=mail; t=1612710915; bh=13R8Wn2qM11ST7Naw+OjjFcv5i8UtT1KZpVfi7pHgvI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jzOysr2n6RCHND1So/MLMGMfZFC9ip1JWvOcdePh4rH+OdYTxMOJG1EHjs6dv4zRh z6MCw2xehNuCS6TDtp9rKJlClKlA3nqknJKVzcMOuJmV1kx7OhhGpMBXZ23vLUp9vO 819EAGxbiSwzrChZ4zS6BLyBUrlkbNwMUlWUJEfU= Received: from mail-hq2.kaspersky.com (unknown [91.103.66.206]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail-hq2.kaspersky.com", Issuer "Kaspersky MailRelays CA G3" (verified OK)) by mailhub12.kaspersky-labs.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6D81375FD4; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:15:15 +0300 (MSK) Received: from arseniy-pc.avp.ru (10.64.68.128) by hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2044.4; Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:15:14 +0300 From: Arseny Krasnov To: Stefan Hajnoczi , Stefano Garzarella , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jason Wang , "David S. Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Arseny Krasnov , Jorgen Hansen , Colin Ian King , Andra Paraschiv , Jeff Vander Stoep CC: , , , , , Subject: [RFC PATCH v4 03/17] af_vsock: separate receive data loop Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2021 18:15:05 +0300 Message-ID: <20210207151508.804615-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20210207151259.803917-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> References: <20210207151259.803917-1-arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.64.68.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: hqmailmbx2.avp.ru (10.64.67.242) To hqmailmbx3.avp.ru (10.64.67.243) X-KSE-ServerInfo: hqmailmbx3.avp.ru, 9 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-AntiSpam-Version: 5.9.16, Database issued on: 02/06/2021 23:52:08 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Status: KAS_STATUS_NOT_DETECTED X-KSE-AntiSpam-Method: none X-KSE-AntiSpam-Rate: 10 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Lua profiles 161679 [Feb 06 2021] X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: LuaCore: 422 422 763e61bea9fcfcd94e075081cb96e065bc0509b4 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Version: 5.9.16.0 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Envelope from: arseny.krasnov@kaspersky.com X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Prob_from_in_msgid} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_date, moscow} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: {Tracking_from_domain_doesnt_match_to} X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Rate: 10 X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Status: not_detected X-KSE-AntiSpam-Info: Method: none X-KSE-Antiphishing-Info: Clean X-KSE-Antiphishing-ScanningType: Deterministic X-KSE-Antiphishing-Method: None X-KSE-Antiphishing-Bases: 02/06/2021 23:55:00 X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-Antivirus-Interceptor-Info: scan successful X-KSE-Antivirus-Info: Clean, bases: 2/6/2021 9:17:00 PM X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KSE-AttachmentFiltering-Interceptor-Info: no applicable attachment filtering rules found X-KSE-BulkMessagesFiltering-Scan-Result: InTheLimit X-KLMS-Rule-ID: 52 X-KLMS-Message-Action: clean X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Status: not scanned, disabled by settings X-KLMS-AntiSpam-Interceptor-Info: not scanned X-KLMS-AntiPhishing: Clean, bases: 2021/02/07 14:21:00 X-KLMS-AntiVirus: Kaspersky Security for Linux Mail Server, version 8.0.3.30, bases: 2021/02/07 10:49:00 #16133380 X-KLMS-AntiVirus-Status: Clean, skipped Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org This moves STREAM specific data receive logic to dedicated function: '__vsock_stream_recvmsg()', while checks that will be same for both types of socket are in shared function: 'vsock_connectible_recvmsg()'. Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 117 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 68 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 38927695786f..66c8a932f49b 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -1898,65 +1898,22 @@ static int vsock_wait_data(struct sock *sk, struct wait_queue_entry *wait, return err; } -static int -vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, - int flags) +static int __vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct sock *sk, struct msghdr *msg, + size_t len, int flags) { - struct sock *sk; - struct vsock_sock *vsk; + struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data; const struct vsock_transport *transport; - int err; - size_t target; + struct vsock_sock *vsk; ssize_t copied; + size_t target; long timeout; - struct vsock_transport_recv_notify_data recv_data; + int err; DEFINE_WAIT(wait); - sk = sock->sk; vsk = vsock_sk(sk); - err = 0; - - lock_sock(sk); - transport = vsk->transport; - if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) { - /* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an - * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a - * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occured with the - * SOCK_DONE flag. - */ - if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) - err = 0; - else - err = -ENOTCONN; - - goto out; - } - - if (flags & MSG_OOB) { - err = -EOPNOTSUPP; - goto out; - } - - /* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut - * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can - * receive. - */ - if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) { - err = 0; - goto out; - } - - /* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer. This - * is not an error. We may as well bail out now. - */ - if (!len) { - err = 0; - goto out; - } - /* We must not copy less than target bytes into the user's buffer * before returning successfully, so we wait for the consume queue to * have that much data to consume before dequeueing. Note that this @@ -2020,6 +1977,68 @@ vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, return err; } +static int +vsock_connectible_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, + int flags) +{ + struct sock *sk; + struct vsock_sock *vsk; + const struct vsock_transport *transport; + int err; + + DEFINE_WAIT(wait); + + sk = sock->sk; + vsk = vsock_sk(sk); + err = 0; + + lock_sock(sk); + + transport = vsk->transport; + + if (!transport || sk->sk_state != TCP_ESTABLISHED) { + /* Recvmsg is supposed to return 0 if a peer performs an + * orderly shutdown. Differentiate between that case and when a + * peer has not connected or a local shutdown occurred with the + * SOCK_DONE flag. + */ + if (sock_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE)) + err = 0; + else + err = -ENOTCONN; + + goto out; + } + + if (flags & MSG_OOB) { + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; + goto out; + } + + /* We don't check peer_shutdown flag here since peer may actually shut + * down, but there can be data in the queue that a local socket can + * receive. + */ + if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) { + err = 0; + goto out; + } + + /* It is valid on Linux to pass in a zero-length receive buffer. This + * is not an error. We may as well bail out now. + */ + if (!len) { + err = 0; + goto out; + } + + err = __vsock_stream_recvmsg(sk, msg, len, flags); + +out: + release_sock(sk); + return err; +} + static const struct proto_ops vsock_stream_ops = { .family = PF_VSOCK, .owner = THIS_MODULE,