From patchwork Sun May 2 16:22:48 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Ido Schimmel X-Patchwork-Id: 430563 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92347C433B4 for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65BF86134F for ; Sun, 2 May 2021 16:24:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232166AbhEBQZg (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 12:25:36 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:34943 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230110AbhEBQZf (ORCPT ); Sun, 2 May 2021 12:25:35 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903215C011D; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:24:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 02 May 2021 12:24:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; bh=A3sH6QRmOFJww5oDye1PHFbjTLC1JchZ/MTPAnasEVE=; b=bRjsFvbA 8bS1vuijg6JhD/IYnvwDuYhX1pg2ogTZLaK3Z2lVYV4vEduFsQl658DiiLDTnoYi MLgQijBbVExbl9reZqmlHwck0/ZHVTLyAYZr66vNGczBPcO0lKp6ZhsPm45f5E4r E3l5yqlDDV/pGqqCjNvX0NXWgQhGOYFYiLA8Ouin5IjWK5HSAO81BSxbp6ZIEj2p He+UfsgKgTYJHqNSpYNpW2ZUaNQpvXFazojFuCBd54REmEmbS+Bg0hs3aPfRVxEq 6GE0E4SX6A43bZXrRety7HMs2fHdoo+4f9lVqZldsF9sH/4380j4tn08zzNzF57V OU0N9RPBH818tg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrvdefvddgtdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekre dtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudetieevffffveelkeeljeffkefhke ehgfdtffethfelvdejgffghefgveejkefhnecukfhppeduleefrdegjedrudeihedrvdeh udenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehiug hoshgthhesihguohhstghhrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Received: from shredder.mellanox.com (unknown [193.47.165.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sun, 2 May 2021 12:24:41 -0400 (EDT) From: Ido Schimmel To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com, petrm@nvidia.com, roopa@nvidia.com, nikolay@nvidia.com, ssuryaextr@gmail.com, mlxsw@nvidia.com, Ido Schimmel Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 01/10] ipv4: Calculate multipath hash inside switch statement Date: Sun, 2 May 2021 19:22:48 +0300 Message-Id: <20210502162257.3472453-2-idosch@idosch.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.2 In-Reply-To: <20210502162257.3472453-1-idosch@idosch.org> References: <20210502162257.3472453-1-idosch@idosch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Ido Schimmel A subsequent patch will add another multipath hash policy where the multipath hash is calculated directly by the policy specific code and not outside of the switch statement. Prepare for this change by moving the multipath hash calculation inside the switch statement. No functional changes intended. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel --- net/ipv4/route.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c index f6787c55f6ab..9d61e969446e 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/route.c +++ b/net/ipv4/route.c @@ -1912,7 +1912,7 @@ int fib_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi4 *fl4, { u32 multipath_hash = fl4 ? fl4->flowi4_multipath_hash : 0; struct flow_keys hash_keys; - u32 mhash; + u32 mhash = 0; switch (net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_policy) { case 0: @@ -1924,6 +1924,7 @@ int fib_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi4 *fl4, hash_keys.addrs.v4addrs.src = fl4->saddr; hash_keys.addrs.v4addrs.dst = fl4->daddr; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 1: /* skb is currently provided only when forwarding */ @@ -1957,6 +1958,7 @@ int fib_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi4 *fl4, hash_keys.ports.dst = fl4->fl4_dport; hash_keys.basic.ip_proto = fl4->flowi4_proto; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; case 2: memset(&hash_keys, 0, sizeof(hash_keys)); @@ -1987,9 +1989,9 @@ int fib_multipath_hash(const struct net *net, const struct flowi4 *fl4, hash_keys.addrs.v4addrs.src = fl4->saddr; hash_keys.addrs.v4addrs.dst = fl4->daddr; } + mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); break; } - mhash = flow_hash_from_keys(&hash_keys); if (multipath_hash) mhash = jhash_2words(mhash, multipath_hash, 0);