From patchwork Mon Nov 9 17:38:35 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Max Reitz X-Patchwork-Id: 322312 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.6 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58BCC2D0A3 for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 542842067D for ; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:53:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="cwlbEwBR" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 542842067D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:44930 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcBMK-0007UN-Al for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:53:40 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40996) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcB8O-0006mI-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:39:16 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:34984) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kcB8K-0000TE-7j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:39:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1604943551; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=q8g52wmoICf/sE92Ciwpuit7Bk1P+BBAtjZl2AdWs4g=; b=cwlbEwBR3v5MDRn0Yn44NidAE9TV/LpplKQ5iEetxp7s4i4PEMUXgdsBBLdh9ELioX3iqN cu7c4n4qGwu3NKemQymyprynUPytxDaUElfjxBojL07kGRikVNPXACUJ6Uy1C1QxRWAaRf zZuOw11CLdOVD1dHhP/9QYZg4NDtvFg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-195-Yzq2uD53Nt6zqZQHGFZeGg-1; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 12:39:08 -0500 X-MC-Unique: Yzq2uD53Nt6zqZQHGFZeGg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AFD41074646; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:39:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-113-179.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.113.179]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D4D5B4A9; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 17:39:06 +0000 (UTC) From: Max Reitz To: qemu-block@nongnu.org Subject: [PULL 11/15] block: Fix integer promotion error in bdrv_getlength() Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 18:38:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20201109173839.2135984-12-mreitz@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20201109173839.2135984-1-mreitz@redhat.com> References: <20201109173839.2135984-1-mreitz@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=mreitz@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=216.205.24.124; envelope-from=mreitz@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/11/09 00:04:29 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Peter Maydell , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Max Reitz Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" From: Eric Blake Back in 2015, we attempted to fix error reporting for images that claimed to have more than INT64_MAX/512 sectors, but due to the type promotions caused by BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE being unsigned, this inadvertently forces all negative ret values to be slammed into -EFBIG rather than the original error. While we're at it, we can avoid the confusing ?: by spelling the logic more directly. Fixes: 4a9c9ea0d3 Reported-by: Guoyi Tu Signed-off-by: Eric Blake Message-Id: <20201105155122.60943-1-eblake@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Alberto Garcia Signed-off-by: Max Reitz --- block.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/block.c b/block.c index 56bacc9e9f..2fd932154e 100644 --- a/block.c +++ b/block.c @@ -5091,8 +5091,13 @@ int64_t bdrv_getlength(BlockDriverState *bs) { int64_t ret = bdrv_nb_sectors(bs); - ret = ret > INT64_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE ? -EFBIG : ret; - return ret < 0 ? ret : ret * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE; + if (ret < 0) { + return ret; + } + if (ret > INT64_MAX / BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE) { + return -EFBIG; + } + return ret * BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE; } /* return 0 as number of sectors if no device present or error */