From patchwork Thu Feb 27 13:37:07 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 230122 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86089C35677 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C96F24691 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:47:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582814827; bh=Zqa2Lb07ENrV+14mEoLnG9RRpmguim7blZ99C4OTWqM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=BWjOZ+NSpwnpXCVF2zAnAPoOYZHfvE5K1tHE1dffgKmdYuVx+5WEvONHWxJs3tVHN gdOtOKmdsTfpUqhIqdNzMx3c24eBD2uJLFqvBq0nWOwZKO9+V2zNLTae+GtwTPAbpl 9IOuyCSiqKj7iyNonJPCXk7ZNhwaH8D+qGox7pcA= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730264AbgB0Nos (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:44:48 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:40338 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730254AbgB0Noo (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 08:44:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D60F420578; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 13:44:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1582811084; bh=Zqa2Lb07ENrV+14mEoLnG9RRpmguim7blZ99C4OTWqM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=aMMreT4GlsvxINut1CshsbYSudXjb9gfuzNBlCTbkQxAjo2l2qk7aIrgEt0npYH+3 hQnTrsfkmWWeXXOE/5D6gc0Kp1gVPd5/krOy0WTAxfK+0MydIQKmV9GOSIyWTg7Ln9 tzx6TUaXl08I3vns9UATpGhH1fPjFu7QlZ4BnNoQ= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, syzbot+65c6c92d04304d0a8efc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, syzbot+e60ddfa48717579799dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, Takashi Iwai Subject: [PATCH 4.4 111/113] ALSA: seq: Avoid concurrent access to queue flags Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 14:37:07 +0100 Message-Id: <20200227132229.592257081@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20200227132211.791484803@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20200227132211.791484803@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Takashi Iwai commit bb51e669fa49feb5904f452b2991b240ef31bc97 upstream. The queue flags are represented in bit fields and the concurrent access may result in unexpected results. Although the current code should be mostly OK as it's only reading a field while writing other fields as KCSAN reported, it's safer to cover both with a proper spinlock protection. This patch fixes the possible concurrent read by protecting with q->owner_lock. Also the queue owner field is protected as well since it's the field to be protected by the lock itself. Reported-by: syzbot+65c6c92d04304d0a8efc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Reported-by: syzbot+e60ddfa48717579799dd@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214111316.26939-2-tiwai@suse.de Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c @@ -415,6 +415,7 @@ int snd_seq_queue_check_access(int queue int snd_seq_queue_set_owner(int queueid, int client, int locked) { struct snd_seq_queue *q = queueptr(queueid); + unsigned long flags; if (q == NULL) return -EINVAL; @@ -424,8 +425,10 @@ int snd_seq_queue_set_owner(int queueid, return -EPERM; } + spin_lock_irqsave(&q->owner_lock, flags); q->locked = locked ? 1 : 0; q->owner = client; + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->owner_lock, flags); queue_access_unlock(q); queuefree(q); @@ -564,15 +567,17 @@ void snd_seq_queue_client_termination(in unsigned long flags; int i; struct snd_seq_queue *q; + bool matched; for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_SEQ_MAX_QUEUES; i++) { if ((q = queueptr(i)) == NULL) continue; spin_lock_irqsave(&q->owner_lock, flags); - if (q->owner == client) + matched = (q->owner == client); + if (matched) q->klocked = 1; spin_unlock_irqrestore(&q->owner_lock, flags); - if (q->owner == client) { + if (matched) { if (q->timer->running) snd_seq_timer_stop(q->timer); snd_seq_timer_reset(q->timer); @@ -764,6 +769,8 @@ void snd_seq_info_queues_read(struct snd int i, bpm; struct snd_seq_queue *q; struct snd_seq_timer *tmr; + bool locked; + int owner; for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_SEQ_MAX_QUEUES; i++) { if ((q = queueptr(i)) == NULL) @@ -775,9 +782,14 @@ void snd_seq_info_queues_read(struct snd else bpm = 0; + spin_lock_irq(&q->owner_lock); + locked = q->locked; + owner = q->owner; + spin_unlock_irq(&q->owner_lock); + snd_iprintf(buffer, "queue %d: [%s]\n", q->queue, q->name); - snd_iprintf(buffer, "owned by client : %d\n", q->owner); - snd_iprintf(buffer, "lock status : %s\n", q->locked ? "Locked" : "Free"); + snd_iprintf(buffer, "owned by client : %d\n", owner); + snd_iprintf(buffer, "lock status : %s\n", locked ? "Locked" : "Free"); snd_iprintf(buffer, "queued time events : %d\n", snd_seq_prioq_avail(q->timeq)); snd_iprintf(buffer, "queued tick events : %d\n", snd_seq_prioq_avail(q->tickq)); snd_iprintf(buffer, "timer state : %s\n", tmr->running ? "Running" : "Stopped");