From patchwork Thu Dec 3 18:32:00 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Wen Yang X-Patchwork-Id: 338401 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81198C18E57 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46FC9208A9 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 18:34:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731713AbgLCSeF (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:34:05 -0500 Received: from out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com ([115.124.30.57]:42292 "EHLO out30-57.freemail.mail.aliyun.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729312AbgLCSeF (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Dec 2020 13:34:05 -0500 X-Alimail-AntiSpam: AC=PASS; BC=-1|-1; BR=01201311R401e4; CH=green; DM=||false|; DS=||; FP=0|-1|-1|-1|0|-1|-1|-1; HT=alimailimapcm10staff010182156082; MF=wenyang@linux.alibaba.com; NM=1; PH=DS; RN=7; SR=0; TI=SMTPD_---0UHQtLoS_1607020391; Received: from localhost(mailfrom:wenyang@linux.alibaba.com fp:SMTPD_---0UHQtLoS_1607020391) by smtp.aliyun-inc.com(127.0.0.1); Fri, 04 Dec 2020 02:33:22 +0800 From: Wen Yang To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Sasha Levin Cc: Xunlei Pang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Eric W. Biederman" , stable@vger.kernel.org, Wen Yang Subject: [PATCH 06/10] proc: Rename in proc_inode rename sysctl_inodes sibling_inodes Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:32:00 +0800 Message-Id: <20201203183204.63759-7-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 In-Reply-To: <20201203183204.63759-1-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20201203183204.63759-1-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: "Eric W. Biederman" [ Upstream commit 0afa5ca82212247456f9de1468b595a111fee633 ] I about to need and use the same functionality for pid based inodes and there is no point in adding a second field when this field is already here and serving the same purporse. Just give the field a generic name so it is clear that it is no longer sysctl specific. Also for good measure initialize sibling_inodes when proc_inode is initialized. Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman Cc: # 4.9.x Signed-off-by: Wen Yang --- fs/proc/inode.c | 1 + fs/proc/internal.h | 2 +- fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/proc/inode.c b/fs/proc/inode.c index a289349..14d9c1d 100644 --- a/fs/proc/inode.c +++ b/fs/proc/inode.c @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb) ei->pde = NULL; ei->sysctl = NULL; ei->sysctl_entry = NULL; + INIT_HLIST_NODE(&ei->sibling_inodes); ei->ns_ops = NULL; inode = &ei->vfs_inode; return inode; diff --git a/fs/proc/internal.h b/fs/proc/internal.h index 103435f..409b5c5 100644 --- a/fs/proc/internal.h +++ b/fs/proc/internal.h @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ struct proc_inode { struct proc_dir_entry *pde; struct ctl_table_header *sysctl; struct ctl_table *sysctl_entry; - struct hlist_node sysctl_inodes; + struct hlist_node sibling_inodes; const struct proc_ns_operations *ns_ops; struct inode vfs_inode; }; diff --git a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c index 191573a..671490e 100644 --- a/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c +++ b/fs/proc/proc_sysctl.c @@ -272,9 +272,9 @@ static void proc_sys_prune_dcache(struct ctl_table_header *head) node = hlist_first_rcu(&head->inodes); if (!node) break; - ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sysctl_inodes); + ei = hlist_entry(node, struct proc_inode, sibling_inodes); spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes); spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); inode = &ei->vfs_inode; @@ -480,7 +480,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, } ei->sysctl = head; ei->sysctl_entry = table; - hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sysctl_inodes, &head->inodes); + hlist_add_head_rcu(&ei->sibling_inodes, &head->inodes); head->count++; spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock); @@ -511,7 +511,7 @@ static struct inode *proc_sys_make_inode(struct super_block *sb, void proc_sys_evict_inode(struct inode *inode, struct ctl_table_header *head) { spin_lock(&sysctl_lock); - hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sysctl_inodes); + hlist_del_init_rcu(&PROC_I(inode)->sibling_inodes); if (!--head->count) kfree_rcu(head, rcu); spin_unlock(&sysctl_lock);