From patchwork Mon Jan 25 18:39:59 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg KH X-Patchwork-Id: 371307 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BE9C433DB for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFB022B51 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2021 21:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728813AbhAZEw3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 23:52:29 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33734 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730568AbhAYSrD (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Jan 2021 13:47:03 -0500 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6AD7C20719; Mon, 25 Jan 2021 18:46:46 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1611600406; bh=qZhxK+d7UQH5+ZPcnOmIHWbHYk5OBbGxHUvQJEVf61s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uRWTgvhcBQp2Ud6m9SciZbwyG2cmVY+JueWHoBTNkWwFBZeCqS68sKyIXLCr2ypO0 XDuFANKwIJfN3IcaJYINN3SCVzK+CX3ay1uT8o4HqxM6KMZloDbmjJEIiysW2/OAm1 cfmR8v83b1zDIKnDpn/u8IyqY1SGux79tA67CJvM= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Guillaume Nault , Jakub Kicinski Subject: [PATCH 5.4 77/86] udp: mask TOS bits in udp_v4_early_demux() Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2021 19:39:59 +0100 Message-Id: <20210125183204.310350361@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.30.0 In-Reply-To: <20210125183201.024962206@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210125183201.024962206@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Guillaume Nault commit 8d2b51b008c25240914984208b2ced57d1dd25a5 upstream. udp_v4_early_demux() is the only function that calls ip_mc_validate_source() with a TOS that hasn't been masked with IPTOS_RT_MASK. This results in different behaviours for incoming multicast UDPv4 packets, depending on if ip_mc_validate_source() is called from the early-demux path (udp_v4_early_demux) or from the regular input path (ip_route_input_noref). ECN would normally not be used with UDP multicast packets, so the practical consequences should be limited on that side. However, IPTOS_RT_MASK is used to also masks the TOS' high order bits, to align with the non-early-demux path behaviour. Reproducer: Setup two netns, connected with veth: $ ip netns add ns0 $ ip netns add ns1 $ ip -netns ns0 link set dev lo up $ ip -netns ns1 link set dev lo up $ ip link add name veth01 netns ns0 type veth peer name veth10 netns ns1 $ ip -netns ns0 link set dev veth01 up $ ip -netns ns1 link set dev veth10 up $ ip -netns ns0 address add 192.0.2.10 peer 192.0.2.11/32 dev veth01 $ ip -netns ns1 address add 192.0.2.11 peer 192.0.2.10/32 dev veth10 In ns0, add route to multicast address 224.0.2.0/24 using source address 198.51.100.10: $ ip -netns ns0 address add 198.51.100.10/32 dev lo $ ip -netns ns0 route add 224.0.2.0/24 dev veth01 src 198.51.100.10 In ns1, define route to 198.51.100.10, only for packets with TOS 4: $ ip -netns ns1 route add 198.51.100.10/32 tos 4 dev veth10 Also activate rp_filter in ns1, so that incoming packets not matching the above route get dropped: $ ip netns exec ns1 sysctl -wq net.ipv4.conf.veth10.rp_filter=1 Now try to receive packets on 224.0.2.11: $ ip netns exec ns1 socat UDP-RECVFROM:1111,ip-add-membership=224.0.2.11:veth10,ignoreeof - In ns0, send packet to 224.0.2.11 with TOS 4 and ECT(0) (that is, tos 6 for socat): $ echo test0 | ip netns exec ns0 socat - UDP-DATAGRAM:224.0.2.11:1111,bind=:1111,tos=6 The "test0" message is properly received by socat in ns1, because early-demux has no cached dst to use, so source address validation is done by ip_route_input_mc(), which receives a TOS that has the ECN bits masked. Now send another packet to 224.0.2.11, still with TOS 4 and ECT(0): $ echo test1 | ip netns exec ns0 socat - UDP-DATAGRAM:224.0.2.11:1111,bind=:1111,tos=6 The "test1" message isn't received by socat in ns1, because, now, early-demux has a cached dst to use and calls ip_mc_validate_source() immediately, without masking the ECN bits. Fixes: bc044e8db796 ("udp: perform source validation for mcast early demux") Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ipv4/udp.c | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/net/ipv4/udp.c +++ b/net/ipv4/udp.c @@ -2495,7 +2495,8 @@ int udp_v4_early_demux(struct sk_buff *s */ if (!inet_sk(sk)->inet_daddr && in_dev) return ip_mc_validate_source(skb, iph->daddr, - iph->saddr, iph->tos, + iph->saddr, + iph->tos & IPTOS_RT_MASK, skb->dev, in_dev, &itag); } return 0;