From patchwork Tue Jun 8 18:27:21 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 456734 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2605CC47082 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CF6C61380 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:34:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233302AbhFHSgh (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:36:37 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57090 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234546AbhFHSen (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:34:43 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 263F161376; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:31:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623177116; bh=GzbMRsUzb729PgDmzp73frCqNVg0mWy6WDCmh0rqdYQ=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=jukmADJ4o2/n4D+YoFrK11jc2Q9E77dmn8Aravoc5qX0UP6CN9wYPeVb4Hzvs73Dt I1XsJa1+f3eXaTdkqu/k3MoPMrkv5xWthyMpJBKTNge7py+sr4DRu51YTlPpw3lWfc qSXAYgxr4MemyLVYV6knmv+HuEFpr9ANN2eQY62w= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , kernel test robot , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann Subject: [PATCH 4.14 38/47] selftests/bpf: fix test_align Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:27:21 +0200 Message-Id: <20210608175931.727183559@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210608175930.477274100@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210608175930.477274100@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Alexei Starovoitov commit 2b36047e7889b7efee22c11e17f035f721855731 upstream. since commit 82abbf8d2fc4 the verifier rejects the bit-wise arithmetic on pointers earlier. The test 'dubious pointer arithmetic' now has less output to match on. Adjust it. Fixes: 82abbf8d2fc4 ("bpf: do not allow root to mangle valid pointers") Reported-by: kernel test robot Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 22 +--------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -474,27 +474,7 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .result = REJECT, .matches = { {4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - /* ptr & 0x40 == either 0 or 0x40 */ - {5, "R5=inv(id=0,umax_value=64,var_off=(0x0; 0x40))"}, - /* ptr << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ - {7, "R5=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because - * the add could overflow. - */ - {8, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* Checked s>=0 */ - {10, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ - {12, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - {14, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, - /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. - * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able - * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the - * upper half of the address space. - * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access - * attempt will fail. - */ - {16, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */ } }, {