From patchwork Tue Jun 8 18:27:22 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Greg Kroah-Hartman X-Patchwork-Id: 456733 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-18.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D68C4743D for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4689261440 for ; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234581AbhFHSgu (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:36:50 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:57466 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234792AbhFHSfA (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jun 2021 14:35:00 -0400 Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 64AC6613BF; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 18:31:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1623177118; bh=ygpkw/oNghGuNKHJYkEMrbxfUB6NMifsDKHSlRKO6MI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=dD3Fg6HZ2VqgGCUYWOcgOR2QLazx1E470cs8981VzBdndE4Nt8ClIUbPk8/oMbuZa XltAfl4TQHB/2d+JGVy3aqxG7g1wMQDP4t1Q0dV9U28DJ83Qodvwqfu/NevNA+pyaK l6AQQPqm7RxOxl7GToCIr27Aqg/+GtpysCR+Y7Ys= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Frank van der Linden Subject: [PATCH 4.14 39/47] selftests/bpf: make dubious pointer arithmetic test useful Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:27:22 +0200 Message-Id: <20210608175931.760589513@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.32.0 In-Reply-To: <20210608175930.477274100@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20210608175930.477274100@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.66 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org From: Alexei Starovoitov commit 31e95b61e172144bb2b626a291db1bdc0769275b upstream. mostly revert the previous workaround and make 'dubious pointer arithmetic' test useful again. Use (ptr - ptr) << const instead of ptr << const to generate large scalar. The rest stays as before commit 2b36047e7889. Fixes: 2b36047e7889 ("selftests/bpf: fix test_align") Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann [fllinden@amazon.com: adjust for 4.14 (no liveness of regs in output)] Signed-off-by: Frank van der Linden Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_align.c @@ -446,11 +446,9 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .insns = { PREP_PKT_POINTERS, BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0), - /* ptr & const => unknown & const */ - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2), - BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_AND, BPF_REG_5, 0x40), - /* ptr << const => unknown << const */ - BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2), + /* (ptr - ptr) << 2 */ + BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_3), + BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_SUB, BPF_REG_5, BPF_REG_2), BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, BPF_REG_5, 2), /* We have a (4n) value. Let's make a packet offset * out of it. First add 14, to make it a (4n+2) @@ -473,8 +471,26 @@ static struct bpf_align_test tests[] = { .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS, .result = REJECT, .matches = { - {4, "R5=pkt(id=0,off=0,r=0,imm=0)"}, - /* R5 bitwise operator &= on pointer prohibited */ + {4, "R5=pkt_end(id=0,off=0,imm=0)"}, + /* (ptr - ptr) << 2 == unknown, (4n) */ + {6, "R5=inv(id=0,smax_value=9223372036854775804,umax_value=18446744073709551612,var_off=(0x0; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* (4n) + 14 == (4n+2). We blow our bounds, because + * the add could overflow. + */ + {7, "R5=inv(id=0,var_off=(0x2; 0xfffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* Checked s>=0 */ + {9, "R5=inv(id=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* packet pointer + nonnegative (4n+2) */ + {11, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + {13, "R4=pkt(id=1,off=4,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, + /* NET_IP_ALIGN + (4n+2) == (4n), alignment is fine. + * We checked the bounds, but it might have been able + * to overflow if the packet pointer started in the + * upper half of the address space. + * So we did not get a 'range' on R6, and the access + * attempt will fail. + */ + {15, "R6=pkt(id=1,off=0,r=0,umin_value=2,umax_value=9223372036854775806,var_off=(0x2; 0x7ffffffffffffffc))"}, } }, {