From patchwork Fri Jan 14 10:28:53 2022 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "libaokun \(A\)" X-Patchwork-Id: 532575 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A239BC433FE for ; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 10:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240288AbiANKRy (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:17:54 -0500 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]:30281 "EHLO szxga02-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240280AbiANKRx (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2022 05:17:53 -0500 Received: from dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.56]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JZy0649Wvzbk0t; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:17:10 +0800 (CST) Received: from huawei.com (10.175.127.227) by dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.88) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.20; Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:17:51 +0800 From: Baokun Li To: , , , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH -next v3 1/2] jffs2: fix memory leak in jffs2_do_mount_fs Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 18:28:53 +0800 Message-ID: <20220114102854.3399585-2-libaokun1@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.31.1 In-Reply-To: <20220114102854.3399585-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> References: <20220114102854.3399585-1-libaokun1@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.175.127.227] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems702-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.179) To dggpeml500020.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.88) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: stable@vger.kernel.org If jffs2_build_filesystem() in jffs2_do_mount_fs() returns an error, we can observe the following kmemleak report: -------------------------------------------- unreferenced object 0xffff88811b25a640 (size 64): comm "mount", pid 691, jiffies 4294957728 (age 71.952s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ backtrace: [] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x584/0x880 [] jffs2_sum_init+0x86/0x130 [] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x798/0xac0 [] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 [] jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] unreferenced object 0xffff88812c760000 (size 65536): comm "mount", pid 691, jiffies 4294957728 (age 71.952s) hex dump (first 32 bytes): bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb bb ................ backtrace: [] __kmalloc+0x6b9/0x910 [] jffs2_sum_init+0xd7/0x130 [] jffs2_do_mount_fs+0x798/0xac0 [] jffs2_do_fill_super+0x383/0xc30 [] jffs2_fill_super+0x2ea/0x4c0 [...] -------------------------------------------- This is because the resources allocated in jffs2_sum_init() are not released. Call jffs2_sum_exit() to release these resources to solve the problem. Fixes: e631ddba5887 ("[JFFS2] Add erase block summary support (mount time improvement)") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Baokun Li --- fs/jffs2/build.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/jffs2/build.c b/fs/jffs2/build.c index b288c8ae1236..837cd55fd4c5 100644 --- a/fs/jffs2/build.c +++ b/fs/jffs2/build.c @@ -415,13 +415,15 @@ int jffs2_do_mount_fs(struct jffs2_sb_info *c) jffs2_free_ino_caches(c); jffs2_free_raw_node_refs(c); ret = -EIO; - goto out_free; + goto out_sum_exit; } jffs2_calc_trigger_levels(c); return 0; + out_sum_exit: + jffs2_sum_exit(c); out_free: kvfree(c->blocks);