From patchwork Sun Apr 26 15:19:52 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Simon Glass X-Patchwork-Id: 238504 List-Id: U-Boot discussion From: sjg at chromium.org (Simon Glass) Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 09:19:52 -0600 Subject: [PATCH v8 8/9] acpi: Move the xsdt pointer to acpi_ctx In-Reply-To: <20200426151953.123850-1-sjg@chromium.org> References: <20200426151953.123850-1-sjg@chromium.org> Message-ID: <20200426091948.v8.8.Ib392027f44b50a6cfdad4ce529b8479958cb302d@changeid> Put this in the context along with the other important pointers. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass Reviewed-by: Wolfgang Wallner --- Changes in v8: None Changes in v7: None Changes in v5: None Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None include/dm/acpi.h | 2 ++ lib/acpi/acpi_table.c | 10 ++++------ test/dm/acpi.c | 5 +++++ 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/dm/acpi.h b/include/dm/acpi.h index c6c63b8183..7563a4c60a 100644 --- a/include/dm/acpi.h +++ b/include/dm/acpi.h @@ -33,11 +33,13 @@ * @rsdp: Pointer to the Root System Description Pointer, typically used when * adding a new table. The RSDP holds pointers to the RSDT and XSDT. * @rsdt: Pointer to the Root System Description Table + * @xsdt: Pointer to the Extended System Description Table */ struct acpi_ctx { void *current; struct acpi_rsdp *rsdp; struct acpi_rsdt *rsdt; + struct acpi_xsdt *xsdt; }; /** diff --git a/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c b/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c index 59980bc0e1..e86df76e2d 100644 --- a/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c +++ b/lib/acpi/acpi_table.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int acpi_add_table(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, void *table) * And now the same thing for the XSDT. We use the same index as for * now we want the XSDT and RSDT to always be in sync in U-Boot */ - xsdt = map_sysmem(ctx->rsdp->xsdt_address, sizeof(*xsdt)); + xsdt = ctx->xsdt; /* Add table to the XSDT */ xsdt->entry[i] = map_to_sysmem(table); @@ -236,8 +236,6 @@ static void acpi_write_xsdt(struct acpi_xsdt *xsdt) void acpi_setup_base_tables(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, void *start) { - struct acpi_xsdt *xsdt; - ctx->current = start; /* Align ACPI tables to 16 byte */ @@ -248,15 +246,15 @@ void acpi_setup_base_tables(struct acpi_ctx *ctx, void *start) acpi_inc_align(ctx, sizeof(struct acpi_rsdp)); ctx->rsdt = ctx->current; acpi_inc_align(ctx, sizeof(struct acpi_rsdt)); - xsdt = ctx->current; + ctx->xsdt = ctx->current; acpi_inc_align(ctx, sizeof(struct acpi_xsdt)); /* clear all table memory */ memset((void *)start, '\0', ctx->current - start); - acpi_write_rsdp(ctx->rsdp, ctx->rsdt, xsdt); + acpi_write_rsdp(ctx->rsdp, ctx->rsdt, ctx->xsdt); acpi_write_rsdt(ctx->rsdt); - acpi_write_xsdt(xsdt); + acpi_write_xsdt(ctx->xsdt); /* * Per ACPI spec, the FACS table address must be aligned to a 64 byte * boundary (Windows checks this, but Linux does not). diff --git a/test/dm/acpi.c b/test/dm/acpi.c index beb1b6da73..a29c3cab3e 100644 --- a/test/dm/acpi.c +++ b/test/dm/acpi.c @@ -160,6 +160,10 @@ static int dm_test_acpi_write_tables(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_asserteq(map_to_sysmem(dmar + 1), ctx.rsdt->entry[1]); ut_asserteq(0, ctx.rsdt->entry[2]); + ut_asserteq(map_to_sysmem(dmar), ctx.xsdt->entry[0]); + ut_asserteq(map_to_sysmem(dmar + 1), ctx.xsdt->entry[1]); + ut_asserteq(0, ctx.xsdt->entry[2]); + return 0; } DM_TEST(dm_test_acpi_write_tables, DM_TESTF_SCAN_PDATA | DM_TESTF_SCAN_FDT); @@ -223,6 +227,7 @@ static int dm_test_acpi_setup_base_tables(struct unit_test_state *uts) ut_assertok(table_compute_checksum(rsdt, sizeof(*rsdt))); xsdt = PTR_ALIGN((void *)rsdt + sizeof(*rsdt), 16); + ut_asserteq_ptr(xsdt, ctx.xsdt); ut_assertok(memcmp("XSDT", xsdt->header.signature, ACPI_NAME_LEN)); ut_asserteq(sizeof(*xsdt), xsdt->header.length); ut_assertok(table_compute_checksum(xsdt, sizeof(*xsdt)));