From patchwork Thu Sep 2 19:04:00 2021 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Pavel Skripkin X-Patchwork-Id: 506210 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847AAC433EF for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 19:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E183610E5 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 19:04:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1347218AbhIBTFG (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:05:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56262 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233011AbhIBTFC (ORCPT ); Thu, 2 Sep 2021 15:05:02 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-x12b.google.com (mail-lf1-x12b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::12b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB2ABC061575; Thu, 2 Sep 2021 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-lf1-x12b.google.com with SMTP id k13so6571451lfv.2; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:04:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NOyqDeyc/FwMKkG6ZTdjkTsk1ZboIqPE5R0kzD5kwqM=; b=Wwead7MONGzVYiH+1uLhcRMd7BwybKn1cdhzq4Pl34GASkjRKqV67XAex8C+WPOTMm zUdNdf1z0NpfpRlh15x2YkOocSs51EWV+GPxl1WU05lH9D+Diwxv109pRCOPWqEghrBx Fv+jjYQYUF/f2QMbE0syyyrDNZgfh1gfM7EHhZbFnOzFWlR2E0+wwcB73yPvPqnTQ+2J afAfOySZvRUBaKZDUs0M0v//Y2anWO38yaI829vAH6nlYI9c08aZLXRQpRYzKC31aflS yUkKkdxDA4Pk1OY+pKaIkeDUXEz0Wk0xInmhYBwlUxhkXr3PGmOX0fFdEe0rIrnouB8Y X09Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=NOyqDeyc/FwMKkG6ZTdjkTsk1ZboIqPE5R0kzD5kwqM=; b=KlsK0Gpc0MIDs3612YoLPh0Mfkll4KCKJrIoSl90klDLTr0tCbQiMKJy1j732kLbC9 /foPTJxW1epK6B1dH1FJIQ/abv+P+O/qOZotIZ0bStegLGzuoUY7Zjgt0AUtC3vTxoNf 1+aUiKHcLbaFr59bM5Vs1OviCyjxRLOyYfqiJVFnlGy1mTB3j4a+A1HYkS368Mex+CXi K+yAj4dihkeIHoRR7+kLPt/B2yut8TkAaPum3pEVPuaS5SUDUfGFq6WspeXhtpQeCjyE ro70mAf34o9tVWW445/F/GflYCGsp41zXnozXM6UqEbQFqainnRNrc9GM8W6+cmWZLBM yhPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531e9Wea5icF21Ce1+vaO7t2JVcZnFR8rt+XzyppP82yo9LYrfwn XTcl61vNJeVoNuiFRSnZ7Ls= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/YbLepWf9qyfLzSGXAvN/DAATPR8KdpZEpodx0YkdPgPh8kveLkNywl+dFVQa2WVBHp7b+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6512:39c6:: with SMTP id k6mr2058369lfu.379.1630609442112; Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:04:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([46.235.67.70]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f7sm336443ljp.90.2021.09.02.12.04.01 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 02 Sep 2021 12:04:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Skripkin To: steffen.klassert@secunet.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Skripkin , syzbot+b2be9dd8ca6f6c73ee2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Subject: [PATCH] net: xfrm: fix shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_get_default Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2021 22:04:00 +0300 Message-Id: <20210902190400.5257-1-paskripkin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.33.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Syzbot hit shift-out-of-bounds in xfrm_get_default. The problem was in missing validation check for user data. up->dirmask comes from user-space, so we need to check if this value is less than XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX to avoid shift-out-of-bounds bugs. Fixes: 2d151d39073a ("xfrm: Add possibility to set the default to block if we have no policy") Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+b2be9dd8ca6f6c73ee2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Signed-off-by: Pavel Skripkin --- net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c index b7b986520dc7..e4cf48c71315 100644 --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c @@ -2005,6 +2005,11 @@ static int xfrm_get_default(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, return -EMSGSIZE; } + if (up->dirmask >= XFRM_USERPOLICY_DIRMASK_MAX) { + kfree_skb(r_skb); + return -EINVAL; + } + r_up = nlmsg_data(r_nlh); r_up->action = ((net->xfrm.policy_default & (1 << up->dirmask)) >> up->dirmask);