From patchwork Thu Jan 18 02:51:35 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Dmitry Safonov X-Patchwork-Id: 764548 Received: from mail-wr1-f49.google.com (mail-wr1-f49.google.com [209.85.221.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F07E4749D for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705546310; cv=none; b=PyMTlDFQZ/oda5le8g3byWwQZrAni48i+uJFJ9sCgnee5yP0Erxbh0Bta0oA85pb+eK1cFOx6gVMIc3NlWFMximFFv2IPNdtbqILr59hQLxzLRJZi6SK7U1yMAwPEVjFqCDOeVJzyfh9Kf1gTflJVbrBVTf0tATWBx/qy+Q5t6Y= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705546310; c=relaxed/simple; bh=QZKaym8nFiRV9Re87RifRE/NGc2FIS+/ruqdmA8E/9Y=; h=Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Gm-Message-State:X-Google-Smtp-Source:X-Received:Received:From: To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:X-Developer-Signature: X-Developer-Key:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=o7bOr8yp2NVFq5arFQDd2k+J21kcjcq0zDxpvgmFybNF6A+fyANHUytRiR3ouQiYfaQpgPvTGT6NChCKK79Y/5WHmz5hf00FQwkUdmln/M3pprZaxZwgRaQsx2MbMogecx6vUkatJUXJGZ3Ib3XRvU64MPKF1WWyI8KC7OMoUp8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=arista.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arista.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com header.i=@arista.com header.b=RnaUryu9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=arista.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arista.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=arista.com header.i=@arista.com header.b="RnaUryu9" Received: by mail-wr1-f49.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-337c40fde20so1099575f8f.0 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=arista.com; s=google; t=1705546307; x=1706151107; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=QfduzUl6xeBtvtYJDyMTI1tDFj6QysY3Ss5eP9VLuq4=; b=RnaUryu9WJX+yexQ0bSf7o1a5cJbb3V+Ka1nrWiWSGu9to5m9tqaxoajm4yi/Hayzg uEKUUtd/WEOB3AyKTn6JL43sj6UY9yOgw6CGI6beTQPSMCIEZ0Kb+Tnn+DC4W1VYNxpg ULjYwcdo89pKQCzyxvtbv3dkV0/DgH6O684v/qNIc3swsqYe4gbaOiwfGKX5ITxmuY2V eJyKUjpRvP12EOXvzeABWNViAmFUHVFS9ETpq7SEQELuOlCznwHysZZ9IKWufhjuoEgp ippkf5jn4tITxqcFer/RRUvThMWHq4PzuyeUXFFN6VubjXtk2chJf0GaP0CV0UnMPstW mOdA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705546307; x=1706151107; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=QfduzUl6xeBtvtYJDyMTI1tDFj6QysY3Ss5eP9VLuq4=; b=VaxB9SUXAJ0cPD0w5JRJwI2/OyeN2CPnqTvb0pZAnv/3KJaWXlGB+judwdFPYhi/eb VCj4MRFoRXLaYGb3rgQ4lP+2IL7M8pz6Ca7AoG/pqZkl1koDgsGZGWE3XLaxpKYrPoPt J8jrT7+IAkRR/uErS5xCHeu19tXEDiED5o3zLN3mEcA8RANCQ/XdB/+Z2cyaf0Aa5FLT lSbDVhE3v5MZrZ1FtdhDPbqVQnLwYPnc8qfIuYHZLI3KL0ANMdnz4JT0kQck0wf2BnLm Fot3xAyxGOHaSsCil/Mg+DuMgey+lII6+YeP8X58uASFbE2A4Qkd4JW7vhsI3EFu2Vld RQ6A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyrpNN0K3Rzfsp8++oRF5kJOjS4P9RUuXstKXe1tQen4p2iK8EF oFo2536BCfxkeh1Br223rYqKoo7nVFhcEOBCM2DKU1/NUKet9tyrjuAnoq2qOg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGm/R0MFqUoxs0sZnObB5pC5VwXCcB30vH4BNIs+FZOGPs6Y6wipK+yotRTeskn8mg4aUbhtA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:cd85:0:b0:337:be02:b9a4 with SMTP id q5-20020adfcd85000000b00337be02b9a4mr74557wrj.106.1705546307343; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:51:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from Mindolluin.ire.aristanetworks.com ([217.173.96.166]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z15-20020a5d440f000000b0033664ffaf5dsm2868219wrq.37.2024.01.17.18.51.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 18:51:46 -0800 (PST) From: Dmitry Safonov To: "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Shuah Khan , Dmitry Safonov <0x7f454c46@gmail.com> Cc: Dmitry Safonov , Mohammad Nassiri , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 2/3] selftests/net: Rectify key counters checks Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 02:51:35 +0000 Message-ID: <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-2-3583ca147113@arista.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-0-3583ca147113@arista.com> References: <20240118-tcp-ao-test-key-mgmt-v1-0-3583ca147113@arista.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: b4 0.13-dev-b6b4b X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1705546294; l=5702; i=dima@arista.com; s=20231212; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=QZKaym8nFiRV9Re87RifRE/NGc2FIS+/ruqdmA8E/9Y=; b=/L7fiuJ8pvO/Z7wlLHp2COBc8azS99uMQ8onBu9cjtNPemIMx1K/wiGBQ+XXKz4wm4HJrkVUg gzvxJJ/nJ8kDBcItyklbYDH+MU/L4UN18UKMbWpKDv8q2AcgKvJwmOo X-Developer-Key: i=dima@arista.com; a=ed25519; pk=hXINUhX25b0D/zWBKvd6zkvH7W2rcwh/CH6cjEa3OTk= As the names of (struct test_key) members didn't reflect whether the key was used for TX or RX, the verification for the counters was done incorrectly for asymmetrical selftests. Rename these with _tx appendix and fix checks in verify_counters(). While at it, as the checks are now correct, introduce skip_counters_checks, which is intended for tests where it's expected that a key that was set with setsockopt(sk, IPPROTO_TCP, TCP_AO_INFO, ...) might had no chance of getting used on the wire. Fixes the following failures, exposed by the previous commit: > not ok 51 server: Check current != rnext keys set before connect(): Counter pkt_good was expected to increase 0 => 0 for key 132:5 > not ok 52 server: Check current != rnext keys set before connect(): Counter pkt_good was not expected to increase 0 => 21 for key 137:10 > > not ok 63 server: Check current flapping back on peer's RnextKey request: Counter pkt_good was expected to increase 0 => 0 for key 132:5 > not ok 64 server: Check current flapping back on peer's RnextKey request: Counter pkt_good was not expected to increase 0 => 40 for key 137:10 Cc: Mohammad Nassiri Fixes: 3c3ead555648 ("selftests/net: Add TCP-AO key-management test") Signed-off-by: Dmitry Safonov --- .../testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c | 44 ++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c index f6a9395e3cd7..24e62120b792 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tcp_ao/key-management.c @@ -417,9 +417,9 @@ struct test_key { matches_vrf : 1, is_current : 1, is_rnext : 1, - used_on_handshake : 1, - used_after_accept : 1, - used_on_client : 1; + used_on_server_tx : 1, + used_on_client_tx : 1, + skip_counters_checks : 1; }; struct key_collection { @@ -609,16 +609,14 @@ static int key_collection_socket(bool server, unsigned int port) addr = &this_ip_dest; sndid = key->client_keyid; rcvid = key->server_keyid; - set_current = key->is_current; - set_rnext = key->is_rnext; + key->used_on_client_tx = set_current = key->is_current; + key->used_on_server_tx = set_rnext = key->is_rnext; } if (test_add_key_cr(sk, key->password, key->len, *addr, vrf, sndid, rcvid, key->maclen, key->alg, set_current, set_rnext)) test_key_error("setsockopt(TCP_AO_ADD_KEY)", key); - if (set_current || set_rnext) - key->used_on_handshake = 1; #ifdef DEBUG test_print("%s [%u/%u] key: { %s, %u:%u, %u, %u:%u:%u:%u (%u)}", server ? "server" : "client", i, collection.nr_keys, @@ -640,22 +638,22 @@ static void verify_counters(const char *tst_name, bool is_listen_sk, bool server for (i = 0; i < collection.nr_keys; i++) { struct test_key *key = &collection.keys[i]; uint8_t sndid, rcvid; - bool was_used; + bool rx_cnt_expected; + if (key->skip_counters_checks) + continue; if (server) { sndid = key->server_keyid; rcvid = key->client_keyid; - if (is_listen_sk) - was_used = key->used_on_handshake; - else - was_used = key->used_after_accept; + rx_cnt_expected = key->used_on_client_tx; } else { sndid = key->client_keyid; rcvid = key->server_keyid; - was_used = key->used_on_client; + rx_cnt_expected = key->used_on_server_tx; } - test_tcp_ao_key_counters_cmp(tst_name, a, b, was_used, + test_tcp_ao_key_counters_cmp(tst_name, a, b, + rx_cnt_expected ? TEST_CNT_KEY_GOOD : 0, sndid, rcvid); } test_tcp_ao_counters_free(a); @@ -916,9 +914,8 @@ static int run_client(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, current_index = nr_keys - 1; if (rnext_index < 0) rnext_index = nr_keys - 1; - collection.keys[current_index].used_on_handshake = 1; - collection.keys[rnext_index].used_after_accept = 1; - collection.keys[rnext_index].used_on_client = 1; + collection.keys[current_index].used_on_client_tx = 1; + collection.keys[rnext_index].used_on_server_tx = 1; synchronize_threads(); /* 3: accepted => send data */ if (test_client_verify(sk, msg_sz, msg_nr, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC)) { @@ -1059,7 +1056,16 @@ static void check_current_back(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, test_error("Can't change the current key"); if (test_client_verify(sk, msg_len, nr_packets, TEST_TIMEOUT_SEC)) test_fail("verify failed"); - collection.keys[rotate_to_index].used_after_accept = 1; + /* There is a race here: between setting the current_key with + * setsockopt(TCP_AO_INFO) and starting to send some data - there + * might have been a segment received with the desired + * RNext_key set. In turn that would mean that the first outgoing + * segment will have the desired current_key (flipped back). + * Which is what the user/test wants. As it's racy, skip checking + * the counters, yet check what are the resulting current/rnext + * keys on both sides. + */ + collection.keys[rotate_to_index].skip_counters_checks = 1; end_client(tst_name, sk, nr_keys, current_index, rnext_index, &tmp); } @@ -1089,7 +1095,7 @@ static void roll_over_keys(const char *tst_name, unsigned int port, } verify_current_rnext(tst_name, sk, -1, collection.keys[i].server_keyid); - collection.keys[i].used_on_client = 1; + collection.keys[i].used_on_server_tx = 1; synchronize_threads(); /* verify current/rnext */ } end_client(tst_name, sk, nr_keys, current_index, rnext_index, &tmp);