From patchwork Wed Mar 13 11:21:20 2024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" X-Patchwork-Id: 780273 Received: from fanzine2.igalia.com (fanzine2.igalia.com [213.97.179.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6B8A3EA72; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 11:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710329430; cv=none; b=L591MWBMTZnk81D3gEn8KZ6AhEIXkigVmCaO+DpNU7DNhjbIidPk3LI1vtqIJriEITGqBLyvM6UsrC59hfeCAGfNq5q9st7Xys0gvRlltrtMpzk+LF1QZ0rS1li7WdusZC+q5p5PU3QuTBuPKFd4s7wB14FBqaMNm18Ds44Xnkc= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710329430; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rwEW4ySKbuvJZTu5EpEHtshEWyyGgcijixSrw4EKNwA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=nyZvgj2IWacyZfRc/oTrEwPyh/1nUvF4VmD5nNS/gL78uCicSk9j2f7oCNkl+/v8e3CqvLADCea58nYUnXdm3ROxzdA3vNXS6Bd6u5AELuGbCkc95nqpkCpt3qsW25DJlw5BotOa7ZqA4NBVpPxhZzGYOn0VTMWMM8bISdsU+h8= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b=JHTkQMP3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=213.97.179.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=igalia.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=igalia.com header.i=@igalia.com header.b="JHTkQMP3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=igalia.com; s=20170329; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:Subject: Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=kky/dRJyKBUx3h381cnSb+YhqF1W+SBQhMlIYZOCUjM=; b=JHTkQMP3eWxl1jUynSym40Wck1 g2mAz51Fn20s+96CmQHKcDABvD0U7X7MAh8NV7U2WODtevqXR+r8b54O4wETah2klzrZr0JSF9Klr JCO6EBtnGl4WIzUgTXbxYw8ATutMGifsELKriAZe14vi2xe3feV3COcNe8fh8P5QEBP8muiGfF5uh PIR55YxKP0+WQEuJZYhrb7gt9/hMS65JrRi+SAeubqb4sxzT5LY1sMc122Z2V+cPs9h0g7WbFc0W5 dTuICzDf03P8r0XenOZhJqn45vVLCoiFWmmaKunBfnN3Wn6DpGh/WHZ+7gzsYscYbvrM6z5xnQylM VGF4cc5w==; Received: from [177.62.247.190] (helo=localhost) by fanzine2.igalia.com with esmtpsa (Cipher TLS1.3:ECDHE_SECP256R1__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim) id 1rkMoN-009vIC-01; Wed, 13 Mar 2024 12:30:19 +0100 From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: jejb@linux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@oracle.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net, kernel-dev@igalia.com, kernel@gpiccoli.net, "Guilherme G. Piccoli" , syzbot+c645abf505ed21f931b5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , John Garry , Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Subject: [PATCH] scsi: core: Fix unremoved procfs host directory regression Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2024 08:21:20 -0300 Message-ID: <20240313113006.2834799-1-gpiccoli@igalia.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Commit fc663711b944 ("scsi: core: Remove the /proc/scsi/${proc_name} directory earlier") fixed a bug related to modules loading/unloading, by adding a call to scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on scsi_remove_host(). But that led to a potential duplicate call to the hostdir_rm() routine, since it's also called from scsi_host_dev_release(). That triggered a regression report, which was then fixed by commit be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression"). The fix just dropped the hostdir_rm() call from dev_release(). But happens that this proc directory is created on scsi_host_alloc(), and that function "pairs" with scsi_host_dev_release(), while scsi_remove_host() pairs with scsi_add_host(). In other words, it seems the reason for removing the proc directory on dev_release() was meant to cover cases in which a SCSI host structure was allocated, but the call to scsi_add_host() didn't happen. And that pattern happens to exist in some error paths, for example. Syzkaller causes that by using USB raw gadget device, error'ing on usb-storage driver, at usb_stor_probe2(). By checking that path, we can see that the BadDevice label leads to a scsi_host_put() after a SCSI host allocation, but there's no call to scsi_add_host() in such path. That leads to messages like this in dmesg (and a leak of the SCSI host proc structure): usb-storage 4-1:87.51: USB Mass Storage device detected proc_dir_entry 'scsi/usb-storage' already registered WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 3519 at fs/proc/generic.c:377 proc_register+0x347/0x4e0 fs/proc/generic.c:376 The proper fix seems to still call scsi_proc_hostdir_rm() on dev_release(), but guard that with the state check for SHOST_CREATED; there is even a comment in scsi_host_dev_release() detailing that: such conditional is meant for cases where the SCSI host was allocated but there was no calls to {add,remove}_host(), like the usb-storage case. This is what we propose here and with that, the error path of usb-storage does not trigger the warning anymore. Reported-by: syzbot+c645abf505ed21f931b5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com Fixes: be03df3d4bfe ("scsi: core: Fix a procfs host directory removal regression") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Bart Van Assche Cc: John Garry Cc: Shin'ichiro Kawasaki Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli --- Hi folks, thanks in advance for reviews. The issue with usb-storage happens upstream but despite we have a repro in the aforementioned Syzkaller report, it's only easy to reproduce the proc_dir_entry warning in a timely manner on stable right now. The reason for that is commit 036abd614007 ("scsi: core: Introduce a new list for SCSI proc directory entries") not being present on stable. This commit (indirectly) bumps the ->present field from unsigned char to uint, and the bug reproducer shows the warning whenever such field overflows, hence it's way easier/faster to see this problem in stable, though it's present in latest v6.8.0 too. Cheers, Guilherme drivers/scsi/hosts.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c index d7f51b84f3c7..445f4a220df3 100644 --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c @@ -353,12 +353,13 @@ static void scsi_host_dev_release(struct device *dev) if (shost->shost_state == SHOST_CREATED) { /* - * Free the shost_dev device name here if scsi_host_alloc() - * and scsi_host_put() have been called but neither + * Free the shost_dev device name and remove the proc host dir + * here if scsi_host_{alloc,put}() have been called but neither * scsi_host_add() nor scsi_remove_host() has been called. * This avoids that the memory allocated for the shost_dev - * name is leaked. + * name as well as the proc dir structure are leaked. */ + scsi_proc_hostdir_rm(shost->hostt); kfree(dev_name(&shost->shost_dev)); }