From patchwork Thu Feb 27 22:21:18 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: "Rafael J. Wysocki" X-Patchwork-Id: 194397 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F026BC3F2C2 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C751424697 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730203AbgB0WZW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:25:22 -0500 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.pl ([79.96.170.134]:44163 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729735AbgB0WZW (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:25:22 -0500 Received: from 79.184.237.30.ipv4.supernova.orange.pl (79.184.237.30) (HELO kreacher.localnet) by serwer1319399.home.pl (79.96.170.134) with SMTP (IdeaSmtpServer 0.83.341) id c5af9dd566d2263a; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:25:20 +0100 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Linux ACPI Cc: LKML , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Daniel Drake Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ACPI: EC: Avoid printing confusing messages in acpi_ec_setup() Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 23:21:18 +0100 Message-ID: <2905294.VeAyQmVl7x@kreacher> In-Reply-To: <2094703.CetWLLyMuz@kreacher> References: <2094703.CetWLLyMuz@kreacher> MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-acpi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" It doesn't really make sense to pass ec->handle of the ECDT EC to acpi_handle_info(), because it is set to ACPI_ROOT_OBJECT in acpi_ec_ecdt_probe(), so rework acpi_ec_setup() to avoid using acpi_handle_info() for printing messages. First, notice that the "Used as first EC" message is not really useful, because it is immediately followed by a more meaningful one from either acpi_ec_ecdt_probe() or acpi_ec_dsdt_probe() (the latter also includes the EC object path), so drop it altogether. Second, use pr_info() for printing the EC configuration information. While at it, make the code in question avoid printing invalid GPE or IRQ numbers and make it print the GPE/IRQ information only when the driver is ready to handle events. Fixes: 72c77b7ea9ce ("ACPI / EC: Cleanup first_ec/boot_ec code") Fixes: 406857f773b0 ("ACPI: EC: add support for hardware-reduced systems") Cc: 5.5+ # 5.5+ Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/ec.c | 15 ++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c index d1f1cf5d4bf0..2dc7cf2aeb21 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c @@ -1584,14 +1584,19 @@ static int acpi_ec_setup(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct acpi_device *device, return ret; /* First EC capable of handling transactions */ - if (!first_ec) { + if (!first_ec) first_ec = ec; - acpi_handle_info(first_ec->handle, "Used as first EC\n"); + + pr_info("EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x%lx, EC_DATA=0x%lx\n", ec->command_addr, + ec->data_addr); + + if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_EVENT_HANDLER_INSTALLED, &ec->flags)) { + if (ec->gpe >= 0) + pr_info("GPE=0x%x\n", ec->gpe); + else + pr_info("IRQ=%d\n", ec->irq); } - acpi_handle_info(ec->handle, - "GPE=0x%x, IRQ=%d, EC_CMD/EC_SC=0x%lx, EC_DATA=0x%lx\n", - ec->gpe, ec->irq, ec->command_addr, ec->data_addr); return ret; }