From patchwork Tue May 26 18:19:49 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Andy Shevchenko X-Patchwork-Id: 246616 List-Id: U-Boot discussion From: andriy.shevchenko at linux.intel.com (Andy Shevchenko) Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 21:19:49 +0300 Subject: [PATCH v1] x86: acpi: Drop _HID() where enumerated by _ADR() Message-ID: <20200526181949.48060-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> ACPICA complains that either _HID() or _ADR() should be used. For General Purpose DMA we may not drop the _ADR() because the device is enumerated by PCI. Thus, simple drop _HID(). Reported-by: Bin Meng Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl index eaf75c8c673d..01077293bb91 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/arch-tangier/acpi/southcluster.asl @@ -531,7 +531,6 @@ Device (PCI0) Device (GDMA) { Name (_ADR, 0x00150000) - Name (_HID, "808611A2") Name (_UID, Zero) Method (_STA, 0, NotSerialized)