From patchwork Wed Aug 5 10:01:58 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Kashyap Chamarthy X-Patchwork-Id: 277111 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC59C433E0 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1139207FC for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="WLroXpcM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org C1139207FC Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56872 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3GJ6-0004kR-14 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:06:00 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:38234) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3GGX-0000Ra-UG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:03:21 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:22613 helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1k3GGW-0000g3-1N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:03:21 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1596621799; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding; bh=MJRWeHC3x8EoLCj1Ajq4OxdqrZrNkiz6n/EGwCnTICw=; b=WLroXpcMynLwn4z9uplzbkH7j+0RUL9yivKWcSpQFbbGd+y+29TRK1CUuIYGkmB5oMqdB3 r/8mbiddDiobqLsbH5BhW1PxZT3SoE5JU6k6/dtAP0zIuvZVg2LNRkwZuBlEyXwhYo4AWM hp0k/Q4uHxWdcEJezCx/KSyUU25LpFg= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-480-M-7W3XvVO2WHqo61SXs-pg-1; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:02:02 -0400 X-MC-Unique: M-7W3XvVO2WHqo61SXs-pg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF87479EC8 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:02:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from paraplu.localdomain (ovpn-114-75.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.114.75]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C415C67138; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 10:01:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Kashyap Chamarthy To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Subject: [PATCH v2] qapi/block-core.json: Remove stale description of 'blockdev-add' Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 12:01:58 +0200 Message-Id: <20200805100158.1239390-1-kchamart@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=205.139.110.120; envelope-from=kchamart@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-1.mimecast.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/08/05 00:45:55 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -30 X-Spam_score: -3.1 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Kevin Wolf , Markus Armbruster , Kashyap Chamarthy Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On a 'qemu-discuss' thread[1], Kevin identifies that the current doc blurb for @blockdev-add is stale: This is actually a documentation bug. @id doesn't exist, blockdev-add never creates a BlockBackend. This was different in the very first versions of the patches to add blockdev-add and we probably just forgot to update the documentation after removing it. So remove the stale bits. And the requirement for 'node-name' is already mentioned in the documentation of @BlockdevOptions: [...] # @node-name: the node name of the new node (Since 2.0). # This option is required on the top level of blockdev-add. # Valid node names start with an alphabetic character and may # contain only alphanumeric characters, '-', '.' and '_'. Their # maximum length is 31 characters. [...] [1] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-discuss/2020-07/msg00071.html -- equivalent to "-drive if=ide,id=disk0....." Fixes: be4b67bc7d ("blockdev: Allow creation of BDS trees without BB") Signed-off-by: Kashyap Chamarthy Suggested-by: Kevin Wolf --- v2: Address Eric Blake's feedback -- https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg08081.html --- qapi/block-core.json | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/qapi/block-core.json b/qapi/block-core.json index 463ffd83da..3575d73ebf 100644 --- a/qapi/block-core.json +++ b/qapi/block-core.json @@ -4049,9 +4049,7 @@ ## # @blockdev-add: # -# Creates a new block device. If the @id option is given at the top level, a -# BlockBackend will be created; otherwise, @node-name is mandatory at the top -# level and no BlockBackend will be created. +# Creates a new block device. # # Since: 2.9 #