| Message ID | 1325213769-11752-3-git-send-email-richard.zhao@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
Hi Sascha & Shawn, Could you look and ack the patch? Thanks Richard
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 08:56:50AM +0800, Richard Zhao wrote: > Hi Sascha & Shawn, > > Could you look and ack the patch? > The patch looks good to me. But it really depends on how the patch #1 looks to Russell.
diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c index c937e75..364793a 100644 --- a/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c +++ b/arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c @@ -99,16 +99,6 @@ static int mxc_set_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, ret = set_cpu_freq(freq_Hz); -#ifdef CONFIG_SMP - /* loops_per_jiffy is not updated by the cpufreq core for SMP systems. - * So update it for all CPUs. - */ - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) - per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).loops_per_jiffy = - cpufreq_scale(per_cpu(cpu_data, cpu).loops_per_jiffy, - freqs.old, freqs.new); -#endif - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { freqs.cpu = cpu; cpufreq_notify_transition(&freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
arm registered cpufreq transition notifier to recalculate it. Signed-off-by: Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@linaro.org> --- arch/arm/plat-mxc/cpufreq.c | 10 ---------- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)