| Message ID | 20201210203318.6914-1-semen.protsenko@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > If "port" node is missing in PHY controller node, dwc3_get_extcon() > isn't able to find extcon device. This is perfectly fine in case when > "usb-role-switch" or OTG is used, but next misleading error message is > printed in that case, from of_graph_get_remote_node(): > > OF: graph: no port node found in /phy@1234abcd > > Avoid printing that message by checking if port node exists in PHY node > before calling of_graph_get_remote_node(). By some reason you have two separate messages (missed --thread when run `git format-patch ...`?). In any case I think it should be dropped or reworked and resent since patch 1/2 got comments. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Hi Andy, On Fri, 11 Dec 2020 at 16:15, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:33:18PM +0200, Sam Protsenko wrote: > > If "port" node is missing in PHY controller node, dwc3_get_extcon() > > isn't able to find extcon device. This is perfectly fine in case when > > "usb-role-switch" or OTG is used, but next misleading error message is > > printed in that case, from of_graph_get_remote_node(): > > > > OF: graph: no port node found in /phy@1234abcd > > > > Avoid printing that message by checking if port node exists in PHY node > > before calling of_graph_get_remote_node(). > > By some reason you have two separate messages (missed --thread when run `git > format-patch ...`?). > > In any case I think it should be dropped or reworked and resent since patch 1/2 > got comments. > Yep, the patch version bit shouldn't be there, just forgot to remove it after `git format-patch'. So this is not a series, just two separate patches, and 2/2 was just dropped. Anyway, I'll resend this one soon, to remove the confusing versioning part. Thanks! > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >
diff --git a/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c b/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c index 3e1c1aacf002..eaf389d3f3c5 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c +++ b/drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c @@ -441,8 +441,8 @@ static int dwc3_drd_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb, static struct extcon_dev *dwc3_get_extcon(struct dwc3 *dwc) { struct device *dev = dwc->dev; - struct device_node *np_phy, *np_conn; - struct extcon_dev *edev; + struct device_node *np_phy; + struct extcon_dev *edev = NULL; const char *name; if (device_property_read_bool(dev, "extcon")) @@ -462,15 +462,22 @@ static struct extcon_dev *dwc3_get_extcon(struct dwc3 *dwc) return edev; } + /* + * Try to get extcon device from USB PHY controller's "port" node. + * Check if it has the "port" node first, to avoid printing the error + * message from underlying code, as it's a valid case: extcon device + * (and "port" node) may be missing in case of "usb-role-switch" or OTG + * mode. + */ np_phy = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "phys", 0); - np_conn = of_graph_get_remote_node(np_phy, -1, -1); + if (of_graph_is_present(np_phy)) { + struct device_node *np_conn; - if (np_conn) - edev = extcon_find_edev_by_node(np_conn); - else - edev = NULL; - - of_node_put(np_conn); + np_conn = of_graph_get_remote_node(np_phy, -1, -1); + if (np_conn) + edev = extcon_find_edev_by_node(np_conn); + of_node_put(np_conn); + } of_node_put(np_phy); return edev;
If "port" node is missing in PHY controller node, dwc3_get_extcon() isn't able to find extcon device. This is perfectly fine in case when "usb-role-switch" or OTG is used, but next misleading error message is printed in that case, from of_graph_get_remote_node(): OF: graph: no port node found in /phy@1234abcd Avoid printing that message by checking if port node exists in PHY node before calling of_graph_get_remote_node(). Signed-off-by: Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@linaro.org> --- drivers/usb/dwc3/drd.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) -- 2.27.0