@@ -800,13 +800,17 @@ static irqreturn_t bam_dma_irq(int irq, void *data)
if (srcs & P_IRQ)
tasklet_schedule(&bdev->task);
- if (srcs & BAM_IRQ)
+ if (srcs & BAM_IRQ) {
clr_mask = readl_relaxed(bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_STTS));
- /* don't allow reorder of the various accesses to the BAM registers */
- mb();
+ /*
+ * don't allow reorder of the various accesses to the BAM
+ * registers
+ */
+ mb();
- writel_relaxed(clr_mask, bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_CLR));
+ writel_relaxed(clr_mask, bam_addr(bdev, 0, BAM_IRQ_CLR));
+ }
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
Currently we write BAM_IRQ_CLR register with zero even when no BAM_IRQ occured. This write has some bad side effects when the BAM instance is for the crypto engine. In case of crypto engine some of the BAM registers are xPU protected and they cannot be controlled by the driver. Signed-off-by: Stanimir Varbanov <stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org> --- drivers/dma/qcom_bam_dma.c | 12 ++++++++---- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) -- 1.7.9.5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/