diff mbox series

[3/3] hwmon: (coretemp) Use a model-specific bitmask to read registers

Message ID 20240406010416.4821-4-ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com
State New
Headers show
Series drivers: thermal/hwmon: intel: Use model-specific bitmasks for temperature registers | expand

Commit Message

Ricardo Neri April 6, 2024, 1:04 a.m. UTC
The Intel Software Development manual defines states the temperature
digital readout as the bits [22:16] of the IA32_[PACKAGE]_THERM_STATUS
registers. In recent processor, however, the range is [23:16]. Use a
model-specific bitmask to extract the temperature readout correctly.

Instead of re-implementing model checks, extract the correct bitmask
using the intel_tcc library. Add an 'imply' weak reverse dependency on
CONFIG_INTEL_TCC. This captures the dependency and lets user to unselect
them if they are so inclined. In such case, the bitmask used for the
digital readout is [22:16] as specified in the Intel Software Developer's
manual.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
---
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.7+
---
 drivers/hwmon/Kconfig    | 1 +
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 6 +++++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Guenter Roeck April 6, 2024, 1:17 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Apr 05, 2024 at 06:04:16PM -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> The Intel Software Development manual defines states the temperature
> digital readout as the bits [22:16] of the IA32_[PACKAGE]_THERM_STATUS
> registers. In recent processor, however, the range is [23:16]. Use a
> model-specific bitmask to extract the temperature readout correctly.
> 
> Instead of re-implementing model checks, extract the correct bitmask
> using the intel_tcc library. Add an 'imply' weak reverse dependency on
> CONFIG_INTEL_TCC. This captures the dependency and lets user to unselect
> them if they are so inclined. In such case, the bitmask used for the
> digital readout is [22:16] as specified in the Intel Software Developer's
> manual.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
> Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v6.7+
> ---
>  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig    | 1 +
>  drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> index 83945397b6eb..11d72b3009bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> @@ -847,6 +847,7 @@ config SENSORS_I5500
>  config SENSORS_CORETEMP
>  	tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor"
>  	depends on X86
> +	imply INTEL_TCC

I do not think it is appropriate to make a hardware monitoring driver
depend on the thermal subsystem.

NAK in the current form.

Guenter
Zhang Rui April 7, 2024, 8:24 a.m. UTC | #2
On Fri, 2024-04-05 at 18:04 -0700, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> The Intel Software Development manual defines states the temperature

I failed to parse this, is the above "states" redundant?

[...]

> digital readout as the bits [22:16] of the
> IA32_[PACKAGE]_THERM_STATUS
> registers. In recent processor, however, the range is [23:16]. Use a
> model-specific bitmask to extract the temperature readout correctly.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> index 616bd1a5b864..5632e1b1dfb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include <linux/sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
>  #include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/intel_tcc.h>
>  #include <linux/mutex.h>
>  #include <linux/list.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -404,6 +405,8 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
>         tjmax = get_tjmax(tdata, dev);
>         /* Check whether the time interval has elapsed */
>         if (time_after(jiffies, tdata->last_updated + HZ)) {
> +               u32 mask =
> intel_tcc_get_temp_mask(is_pkg_temp_data(tdata));
> +
>                 rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax,
> &edx);
>                 /*
>                  * Ignore the valid bit. In all observed cases the
> register
> @@ -411,7 +414,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
>                  * Return it instead of reporting an error which
> doesn't
>                  * really help at all.
>                  */
> -               tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & 0x7f) * 1000;
> +               tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & mask) * 1000;
>                 tdata->last_updated = jiffies;
>         }
> 
Besides this one, we can also convert to use intel_tcc_get_tjmax() in
get_tjmax().

thanks,
rui
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
index 83945397b6eb..11d72b3009bf 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
@@ -847,6 +847,7 @@  config SENSORS_I5500
 config SENSORS_CORETEMP
 	tristate "Intel Core/Core2/Atom temperature sensor"
 	depends on X86
+	imply INTEL_TCC
 	help
 	  If you say yes here you get support for the temperature
 	  sensor inside your CPU. Most of the family 6 CPUs
diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 616bd1a5b864..5632e1b1dfb1 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ 
 #include <linux/sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/hwmon-sysfs.h>
 #include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/intel_tcc.h>
 #include <linux/mutex.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -404,6 +405,8 @@  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
 	tjmax = get_tjmax(tdata, dev);
 	/* Check whether the time interval has elapsed */
 	if (time_after(jiffies, tdata->last_updated + HZ)) {
+		u32 mask = intel_tcc_get_temp_mask(is_pkg_temp_data(tdata));
+
 		rdmsr_on_cpu(tdata->cpu, tdata->status_reg, &eax, &edx);
 		/*
 		 * Ignore the valid bit. In all observed cases the register
@@ -411,7 +414,7 @@  static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
 		 * Return it instead of reporting an error which doesn't
 		 * really help at all.
 		 */
-		tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & 0x7f) * 1000;
+		tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & mask) * 1000;
 		tdata->last_updated = jiffies;
 	}
 
@@ -838,4 +841,5 @@  module_exit(coretemp_exit)
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel Core temperature monitor");
+MODULE_IMPORT_NS(INTEL_TCC);
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");