mbox series

[RESEND,0/2] usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines

Message ID 20240328-tps6598x_fix_event_handling-v1-0-502721ff705b@wolfvision.net
Headers show
Series usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking in interrupt service routines | expand

Message

Javier Carrasco March 28, 2024, 4:55 p.m. UTC
The ISRs of the tps25750 and tps6598x do not handle generated events
properly under all circumstances.

The tps6598x ISR does not read all bits of the INT_EVENTX registers,
leaving events signaled with bits above 64 unattended. Moreover, these
events are not cleared, leaving the interrupt enabled.

The tps25750 reads all bits of the INT_EVENT1 register, but the event
checking is not right because the same event is checked in two different
regions of the same register by means of an OR operation.

This series aims to fix both issues by reading all bits of the
INT_EVENTX registers, and limiting the event checking to the region
where the supported events are defined (currently they are limited to
the first 64 bits of the registers, as the are defined as BIT_ULL()).

If the need for events above the first 64 bits of the INT_EVENTX
registers arises, a different mechanism might be required. But for the
current needs, all definitions can be left as they are.

Note: resend to add the Cc tag for 'stable' (fixes in the series).

Signed-off-by: Javier Carrasco <javier.carrasco@wolfvision.net>
---
Javier Carrasco (2):
      usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps25750
      usb: typec: tipd: fix event checking for tps6598x

 drivers/usb/typec/tipd/core.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 4cece764965020c22cff7665b18a012006359095
change-id: 20240328-tps6598x_fix_event_handling-3398d3d82f85

Best regards,

Comments

Heikki Krogerus April 2, 2024, 10:21 a.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:55:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
> The ISRs of the tps25750 and tps6598x do not handle generated events
> properly under all circumstances.
> 
> The tps6598x ISR does not read all bits of the INT_EVENTX registers,
> leaving events signaled with bits above 64 unattended. Moreover, these
> events are not cleared, leaving the interrupt enabled.
> 
> The tps25750 reads all bits of the INT_EVENT1 register, but the event
> checking is not right because the same event is checked in two different
> regions of the same register by means of an OR operation.
> 
> This series aims to fix both issues by reading all bits of the
> INT_EVENTX registers, and limiting the event checking to the region
> where the supported events are defined (currently they are limited to
> the first 64 bits of the registers, as the are defined as BIT_ULL()).
> 
> If the need for events above the first 64 bits of the INT_EVENTX
> registers arises, a different mechanism might be required. But for the
> current needs, all definitions can be left as they are.
> 
> Note: resend to add the Cc tag for 'stable' (fixes in the series).

So this should be v3 (or v2?). Next time please follow the guide
when submitting patches:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format

thanks,
Javier Carrasco April 2, 2024, 5:39 p.m. UTC | #2
On 4/2/24 12:21, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 05:55:50PM +0100, Javier Carrasco wrote:
>> The ISRs of the tps25750 and tps6598x do not handle generated events
>> properly under all circumstances.
>>
>> The tps6598x ISR does not read all bits of the INT_EVENTX registers,
>> leaving events signaled with bits above 64 unattended. Moreover, these
>> events are not cleared, leaving the interrupt enabled.
>>
>> The tps25750 reads all bits of the INT_EVENT1 register, but the event
>> checking is not right because the same event is checked in two different
>> regions of the same register by means of an OR operation.
>>
>> This series aims to fix both issues by reading all bits of the
>> INT_EVENTX registers, and limiting the event checking to the region
>> where the supported events are defined (currently they are limited to
>> the first 64 bits of the registers, as the are defined as BIT_ULL()).
>>
>> If the need for events above the first 64 bits of the INT_EVENTX
>> registers arises, a different mechanism might be required. But for the
>> current needs, all definitions can be left as they are.
>>
>> Note: resend to add the Cc tag for 'stable' (fixes in the series).
> 
> So this should be v3 (or v2?). Next time please follow the guide
> when submitting patches:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#the-canonical-patch-format
> 
> thanks,
> 
The first resend only added 'stable' to Cc (which was wrong) with no
modifications at all, and the second resend (this one) actually modified
the commit description to include 'stable', which should have turned it
into a v2.

I will tag the next version as v3 to account for this, thanks for the
feedback.

Best regards,
Javier Carrasco