diff mbox series

[117/141] rtl8xxxu: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Message ID d522f387b2d0dde774785c7169c1f25aa529989d.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org
State Superseded
Headers show
Series Fix fall-through warnings for Clang | expand

Commit Message

Gustavo A. R. Silva Nov. 20, 2020, 6:38 p.m. UTC
In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix
multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with
the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the
code fall through to the next case.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Gustavo A. R. Silva Nov. 24, 2020, 4:09 p.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:39:42PM -0500, Jes Sorensen wrote:
> On 11/20/20 1:38 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:

> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix

> > multiple warnings by replacing /* fall through */ comments with

> > the new pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the

> > code fall through to the next case.

> > 

> > Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as

> > implicit fall-through markings.

> > 

> > Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115

> > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

> > ---

> >  drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c | 8 ++++----

> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

> 

> While I wasn't CC'ed on the cover-letter I see Jakub also raised issues

> about this unnecessary patch noise.

> 

> Quite frankly, this seems to be patch churn for the sake of patch churn.

> If clang is broken, fix clang instead.


Just notice that the idea behind this and the following patch is exactly
the same:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kvalo/wireless-drivers-next.git/commit/?id=3f95e92c8a8516b745594049dfccc8c5f8895eea

I could resend this same patch with a different changelog text, but I
don't think such a thing is necessary. However, if people prefer that
approach, just let me know and I can do it.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

> > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c

> > index 5cd7ef3625c5..afc97958fa4d 100644

> > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c

> > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c

> > @@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen1_config_channel(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)

> >  	switch (hw->conf.chandef.width) {

> >  	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT:

> >  		ht = false;

> > -		/* fall through */

> > +		fallthrough;

> >  	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:

> >  		opmode |= BW_OPMODE_20MHZ;

> >  		rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_BW_OPMODE, opmode);

> > @@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@ void rtl8xxxu_gen2_config_channel(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)

> >  	switch (hw->conf.chandef.width) {

> >  	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT:

> >  		ht = false;

> > -		/* fall through */

> > +		fallthrough;

> >  	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:

> >  		rf_mode_bw |= WMAC_TRXPTCL_CTL_BW_20;

> >  		subchannel = 0;

> > @@ -1741,11 +1741,11 @@ static int rtl8xxxu_identify_chip(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)

> >  		case 3:

> >  			priv->ep_tx_low_queue = 1;

> >  			priv->ep_tx_count++;

> > -			/* fall through */

> > +			fallthrough;

> >  		case 2:

> >  			priv->ep_tx_normal_queue = 1;

> >  			priv->ep_tx_count++;

> > -			/* fall through */

> > +			fallthrough;

> >  		case 1:

> >  			priv->ep_tx_high_queue = 1;

> >  			priv->ep_tx_count++;

> > 

>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
index 5cd7ef3625c5..afc97958fa4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_core.c
@@ -1145,7 +1145,7 @@  void rtl8xxxu_gen1_config_channel(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	switch (hw->conf.chandef.width) {
 	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT:
 		ht = false;
-		/* fall through */
+		fallthrough;
 	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:
 		opmode |= BW_OPMODE_20MHZ;
 		rtl8xxxu_write8(priv, REG_BW_OPMODE, opmode);
@@ -1272,7 +1272,7 @@  void rtl8xxxu_gen2_config_channel(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
 	switch (hw->conf.chandef.width) {
 	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20_NOHT:
 		ht = false;
-		/* fall through */
+		fallthrough;
 	case NL80211_CHAN_WIDTH_20:
 		rf_mode_bw |= WMAC_TRXPTCL_CTL_BW_20;
 		subchannel = 0;
@@ -1741,11 +1741,11 @@  static int rtl8xxxu_identify_chip(struct rtl8xxxu_priv *priv)
 		case 3:
 			priv->ep_tx_low_queue = 1;
 			priv->ep_tx_count++;
-			/* fall through */
+			fallthrough;
 		case 2:
 			priv->ep_tx_normal_queue = 1;
 			priv->ep_tx_count++;
-			/* fall through */
+			fallthrough;
 		case 1:
 			priv->ep_tx_high_queue = 1;
 			priv->ep_tx_count++;