Message ID | 20230918081407.756858-1-li.meng@amd.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | amd-pstate preferred core | expand |
On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 04:14:00PM +0800, Meng, Li (Jassmine) wrote: > Hi all: > > The core frequency is subjected to the process variation in semiconductors. > Not all cores are able to reach the maximum frequency respecting the > infrastructure limits. Consequently, AMD has redefined the concept of > maximum frequency of a part. This means that a fraction of cores can reach > maximum frequency. To find the best process scheduling policy for a given > scenario, OS needs to know the core ordering informed by the platform through > highest performance capability register of the CPPC interface. > > Earlier implementations of amd-pstate preferred core only support a static > core ranking and targeted performance. Now it has the ability to dynamically > change the preferred core based on the workload and platform conditions and > accounting for thermals and aging. > > Amd-pstate driver utilizes the functions and data structures provided by > the ITMT architecture to enable the scheduler to favor scheduling on cores > which can be get a higher frequency with lower voltage. > We call it amd-pstate preferred core. > > Here sched_set_itmt_core_prio() is called to set priorities and > sched_set_itmt_support() is called to enable ITMT feature. > Amd-pstate driver uses the highest performance value to indicate > the priority of CPU. The higher value has a higher priority. > > Amd-pstate driver will provide an initial core ordering at boot time. > It relies on the CPPC interface to communicate the core ranking to the > operating system and scheduler to make sure that OS is choosing the cores > with highest performance firstly for scheduling the process. When amd-pstate > driver receives a message with the highest performance change, it will > update the core ranking. > > Changes form V6->V7: > - x86: > - - Modify kconfig about X86_AMD_PSTATE. > - cpufreq: amd-pstate: > - - modify incorrect comments about scheduler_work(). > - - convert highest_perf data type. > - - modify preferred core init when cpu init and online. > - acpi: cppc: > - - modify link of CPPC highest performance. > - cpufreq: > - - modify link of CPPC highest performance changed. > > Changes form V5->V6: > - cpufreq: amd-pstate: > - - modify the wrong tag order. > - - modify warning about hw_prefcore sysfs attribute. > - - delete duplicate comments. > - - modify the variable name cppc_highest_perf to prefcore_ranking. > - - modify judgment conditions for setting highest_perf. > - - modify sysfs attribute for CPPC highest perf to pr_debug message. > - Documentation: amd-pstate: > - - modify warning: title underline too short. Apart from the comment in patch 3, others look good for me. Please feel free to add my RB in other patches: Reviewed-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com> > > Changes form V4->V5: > - cpufreq: amd-pstate: > - - modify sysfs attribute for CPPC highest perf. > - - modify warning about comments > - - rebase linux-next > - cpufreq: > - - Moidfy warning about function declarations. > - Documentation: amd-pstate: > - - align with ``amd-pstat`` > > Changes form V3->V4: > - Documentation: amd-pstate: > - - Modify inappropriate descriptions. > > Changes form V2->V3: > - x86: > - - Modify kconfig and description. > - cpufreq: amd-pstate: > - - Add Co-developed-by tag in commit message. > - cpufreq: > - - Modify commit message. > - Documentation: amd-pstate: > - - Modify inappropriate descriptions. > > Changes form V1->V2: > - acpi: cppc: > - - Add reference link. > - cpufreq: > - - Moidfy link error. > - cpufreq: amd-pstate: > - - Init the priorities of all online CPUs > - - Use a single variable to represent the status of preferred core. > - Documentation: > - - Default enabled preferred core. > - Documentation: amd-pstate: > - - Modify inappropriate descriptions. > - - Default enabled preferred core. > - - Use a single variable to represent the status of preferred core. > > Meng Li (7): > x86: Drop CPU_SUP_INTEL from SCHED_MC_PRIO for the expansion. > acpi: cppc: Add get the highest performance cppc control > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core supporting. > cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed > cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate preferred core ranking > dynamically > Documentation: amd-pstate: introduce amd-pstate preferred core > Documentation: introduce amd-pstate preferrd core mode kernel command > line options > > .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 + > Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 58 +++++- > arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +- > drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 13 ++ > drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 6 + > drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++-- > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 ++ > include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 + > include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 6 + > include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 + > 10 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.34.1 >
On 9/19/2023 14:01, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: >> Meng Li (7): >> x86: Drop CPU_SUP_INTEL from SCHED_MC_PRIO for the expansion. >> acpi: cppc: Add get the highest performance cppc control >> cpufreq: amd-pstate: Enable amd-pstate preferred core supporting. >> cpufreq: Add a notification message that the highest perf has changed >> cpufreq: amd-pstate: Update amd-pstate preferred core ranking >> dynamically >> Documentation: amd-pstate: introduce amd-pstate preferred core >> Documentation: introduce amd-pstate preferrd core mode kernel command >> line options >> >> .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 5 + >> Documentation/admin-guide/pm/amd-pstate.rst | 58 +++++- >> arch/x86/Kconfig | 5 +- >> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 13 ++ >> drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c | 6 + >> drivers/cpufreq/amd-pstate.c | 197 ++++++++++++++++-- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 13 ++ >> include/acpi/cppc_acpi.h | 5 + >> include/linux/amd-pstate.h | 6 + >> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 5 + >> 10 files changed, 291 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below. > > If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbostat` reports ~4.9 GHz on core 0 where `taskset -c 0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null` is being run. > > After I suspend the machine and then resume it, and run `dd` again, `turbostat` reports the core to be capped to a stock frequency of ~3.4 GHz. Rebooting the machine fixes this, and the CPU can boost again. > > If this patchset is reverted, then the CPU can turbo after suspend/resume cycle just fine. > > I'm using `amd_pstate=guided`. > > Is this behaviour expected? To help confirm where the issue is, can I ask you to do three experiments with the patch series applied: 1) 'amd_pstate=active' on your kernel command line. 2) 'amd_pstate=active amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. 3) 'amd_pstate=guided amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. Looking through the code, I anticipate from your report that it reproduces on "1" but not "2" and "3". Meng, Can you try to repro? I think that it's probably a call to amd_pstate_init_prefcore() missing from amd_pstate_cpu_resume() and also amd_pstate_epp_resume().
Hello. On středa 20. září 2023 18:56:09 CEST Mario Limonciello wrote: > > When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below. > > > > If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbostat` reports ~4.9 GHz on core 0 where `taskset -c 0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null` is being run. > > > > After I suspend the machine and then resume it, and run `dd` again, `turbostat` reports the core to be capped to a stock frequency of ~3.4 GHz. Rebooting the machine fixes this, and the CPU can boost again. > > > > If this patchset is reverted, then the CPU can turbo after suspend/resume cycle just fine. > > > > I'm using `amd_pstate=guided`. > > > > Is this behaviour expected? > > To help confirm where the issue is, can I ask you to do three > experiments with the patch series applied: > > 1) 'amd_pstate=active' on your kernel command line. The issue is reproducible. If I toggle the governor in cpupower to `powersave` and back to `performance`, boost is restored. > 2) 'amd_pstate=active amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. The issue is not reproducible. > 3) 'amd_pstate=guided amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. The issue is not reproducible. I should also mention that in my initial configuration I use `amd_pstate=guided` and `schedutil`. If I switch to `performance` after suspend-resume cycle, the boost is restored. However, if I switch back to `schedutil`, the freq is capped. Does this info help? > Looking through the code, I anticipate from your report that it > reproduces on "1" but not "2" and "3". > > Meng, > > Can you try to repro? > > I think that it's probably a call to amd_pstate_init_prefcore() missing > from amd_pstate_cpu_resume() and also amd_pstate_epp_resume().
On 9/20/2023 14:34, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > Hello. > > On středa 20. září 2023 18:56:09 CEST Mario Limonciello wrote: >>> When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below. >>> >>> If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbostat` reports ~4.9 GHz on core 0 where `taskset -c 0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null` is being run. >>> >>> After I suspend the machine and then resume it, and run `dd` again, `turbostat` reports the core to be capped to a stock frequency of ~3.4 GHz. Rebooting the machine fixes this, and the CPU can boost again. >>> >>> If this patchset is reverted, then the CPU can turbo after suspend/resume cycle just fine. >>> >>> I'm using `amd_pstate=guided`. >>> >>> Is this behaviour expected? >> >> To help confirm where the issue is, can I ask you to do three >> experiments with the patch series applied: >> >> 1) 'amd_pstate=active' on your kernel command line. > > The issue is reproducible. If I toggle the governor in cpupower to `powersave` and back to `performance`, boost is restored. > >> 2) 'amd_pstate=active amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. > > The issue is not reproducible. > >> 3) 'amd_pstate=guided amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command line. > > The issue is not reproducible. > > I should also mention that in my initial configuration I use `amd_pstate=guided` and `schedutil`. If I switch to `performance` after suspend-resume cycle, the boost is restored. However, if I switch back to `schedutil`, the freq is capped. > > Does this info help? > Yeah, it matches my expectations for this issue you reported. Thanks! Jassmine can dig into a fix for another spin of this series. >> Looking through the code, I anticipate from your report that it >> reproduces on "1" but not "2" and "3". >> >> Meng, >> >> Can you try to repro? >> >> I think that it's probably a call to amd_pstate_init_prefcore() missing >> from amd_pstate_cpu_resume() and also amd_pstate_epp_resume(). >
[AMD Official Use Only - General] Hi Natalenko and Mario: > -----Original Message----- > From: Limonciello, Mario <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com> > Sent: Thursday, September 21, 2023 4:12 AM > To: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@natalenko.name>; Huang, Ray > <Ray.Huang@amd.com>; Meng, Li (Jassmine) <Li.Meng@amd.com> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; > x86@kernel.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org; Shuah Khan > <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>; linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org; Fontenot, > Nathan <Nathan.Fontenot@amd.com>; Sharma, Deepak > <Deepak.Sharma@amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander > <Alexander.Deucher@amd.com>; Huang, Shimmer > <Shimmer.Huang@amd.com>; Yuan, Perry <Perry.Yuan@amd.com>; Du, > Xiaojian <Xiaojian.Du@amd.com>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>; > Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>; Rafael J . Wysocki > <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 0/7] amd-pstate preferred core > > On 9/20/2023 14:34, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote: > > Hello. > > > > On středa 20. září 2023 18:56:09 CEST Mario Limonciello wrote: > >>> When applied on top of v6.5.3 this breaks turbo on my 5950X after > suspend/resume cycle. Please see the scenario description below. > >>> > >>> If I boot v6.5.3 + this patchset, then `turbostat` reports ~4.9 GHz on core > 0 where `taskset -c 0 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null` is being run. > >>> > >>> After I suspend the machine and then resume it, and run `dd` again, > `turbostat` reports the core to be capped to a stock frequency of ~3.4 GHz. > Rebooting the machine fixes this, and the CPU can boost again. > >>> > >>> If this patchset is reverted, then the CPU can turbo after > suspend/resume cycle just fine. > >>> > >>> I'm using `amd_pstate=guided`. > >>> > >>> Is this behaviour expected? > >> > >> To help confirm where the issue is, can I ask you to do three > >> experiments with the patch series applied: > >> > >> 1) 'amd_pstate=active' on your kernel command line. > > > > The issue is reproducible. If I toggle the governor in cpupower to > `powersave` and back to `performance`, boost is restored. > > > >> 2) 'amd_pstate=active amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command > line. > > > > The issue is not reproducible. > > > >> 3) 'amd_pstate=guided amd_prefcore=disable' on your kernel command > line. > > > > The issue is not reproducible. > > > > I should also mention that in my initial configuration I use > `amd_pstate=guided` and `schedutil`. If I switch to `performance` after > suspend-resume cycle, the boost is restored. However, if I switch back to > `schedutil`, the freq is capped. > > > > Does this info help? > > > > Yeah, it matches my expectations for this issue you reported. > Thanks! > > Jassmine can dig into a fix for another spin of this series. [Meng, Li (Jassmine)] Thank you very much! I will fix this issue in the next patches. > > >> Looking through the code, I anticipate from your report that it > >> reproduces on "1" but not "2" and "3". > >> > >> Meng, > >> > >> Can you try to repro? > >> > >> I think that it's probably a call to amd_pstate_init_prefcore() > >> missing from amd_pstate_cpu_resume() and also > amd_pstate_epp_resume(). > >