| Message ID | 20220908080938.29199-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org |
|---|---|
| State | Accepted |
| Commit | 4bef4d519b01cf15818b81a3fbf62d9f51612ad3 |
| Headers | show |
| Series | None | expand |
On Thu, 08 Sep 2022 10:09:38 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
On Thu, 08 Sep 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) I guess I can't take this until the 2 arch/ patches are applied.
On 28/09/2022 11:41, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 08 Sep 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >> GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". >> >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> >> --- >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > I guess I can't take this until the 2 arch/ patches are applied. You can. It will warn when running dtbs_check, but that's not a big deal. Anyway DTS patches wait for quite a while, so there was enough of time for them to get to next. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Wed, 28 Sep 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 28/09/2022 11:41, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 08 Sep 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > >> GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > >> --- > >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- > >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > I guess I can't take this until the 2 arch/ patches are applied. > > You can. It will warn when running dtbs_check, but that's not a big > deal. Anyway DTS patches wait for quite a while, so there was enough of > time for them to get to next. I'll apply them after -rc1. :thumb
On Thu, 08 Sep 2022, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". > > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Applied, thanks.
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml index 9676a9e3d176..6afe8f03314d 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml @@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ patternProperties: type: object $ref: /schemas/extcon/qcom,pm8941-misc.yaml# - "gpio(s)?@[0-9a-f]+$": + "gpio@[0-9a-f]+$": type: object $ref: /schemas/pinctrl/qcom,pmic-gpio.yaml# @@ -197,7 +197,7 @@ examples: #address-cells = <1>; #size-cells = <0>; - pmi8998_gpio: gpios@c000 { + pmi8998_gpio: gpio@c000 { compatible = "qcom,pmi8998-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio"; reg = <0xc000>; gpio-controller; @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ examples: }; }; - pm6150_gpio: gpios@c000 { + pm6150_gpio: gpio@c000 { compatible = "qcom,pm6150-gpio", "qcom,spmi-gpio"; reg = <0xc000>; gpio-controller;
GPIO controller nodes are named by convention just "gpio", not "gpios". Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> --- Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)